The state of research on technological uncertainties, social uncertainties and emerging markets: A multidisciplinary literature review

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 78, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1158-1163

  Pillania, Rajesh K ^a,b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Bibliometric analysis; Emerging markets; Literature review; Social uncertainties; Technological uncertainties

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMMERCE; PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; EMERGING MARKETS; LITERATURE REVIEWS; SOCIAL UNCERTAINTIES; TECHNOLOGICAL UNCERTAINTY;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

LITERATURE REVIEW; MARKET DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 80051598630     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Pillania R.K. Multinationals and emerging markets. Business Strategy Series 2009, 10(2):100-103.
2. Pillania R.K. Multinationals and emerging markets guest editorial. Multinational Business Review 2009, 17(2):i-v.
3. Kim J., McMillan S. Evaluation of internet advertising research - a bibliometric analysis of citations from key sources. Journal of Advertising 2008, 37(1):99-112.
4. Borgman C.L. Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics Revisited. The Web of Knowledge 2000, 143-162. Medford, NJ. B. Cronin, H.B. Atkins (Eds.).
5. Price D.J.D. General theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantages processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1976, 27(5-5):292-306.
6. White H.D., McCain K.W. Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 1989, 24:119-186.
7. Wiberley S.E. A methodological approach to developing bibliometric models of types of humanities scholarship. Library Quarterly 2003, 73(2):121-159.
8. Glanzel W. A bibliometric approach to social sciences, national research performances in 6 selected social science areas, 1990-1992. Scientometrics 1996, 35(3):291-307.
9. Pasadeos Y., Renfro R.B., Hanily M.L. Influential authors and works of the public relations scholarly literature: a network of recent research. Journal of Public Relations Research 1999, 11(1):29-52.
10. Kim J., McMillan S. Evaluation of internet advertising research - a bibliometric analysis of citations from key sources. Journal of Advertising 2008, 37(1):99-112.
11. Arnott D.C. Research on trust: a bibliography and brief bibliometric analysis of the special issue submissions. European Journal of Marketing 2007, 41(9-10):1203-1240.
12. Pillania R.K., Fetscherin M. Multinationals and emerging markets guest editorial. Multinational Business Review 2009, 17(2):1-9.
13. Acedo J., Casillas C. Current paradigms in the international management field: an author co-citation analysis. International Business Review 2005, 14(5):619-639.
14. Van Raan A.F.J. The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. Technikfolgenabschätzung, Theorie und Praxis 2003, 12(1):20-29.
15. Reeves B., Borgman C.L. A bibliometric evaluation of core journals in communication research. Human Communication Research 1983, 10(1):119-136.
16. Schubert A., Glanzel W., Braun T. Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981-1985. Scientometrics 1989, 16(1-6):463-478.
17. Karmarkar U. Will you survive the services revolution?. Harvard Business Review 2004, 82(6):100-109.
18. Mythen G. Employment, individualization and insecurity: rethinking the risk society perspective. Sociological Review 2005, 53(1):129-149.
19. Monda K.L., Gordon-Larsen P., Stevens J., et al. China's transition: the effect of rapid urbanization on adult occupational physical activity. Social Science & Medicine 2007, 64(4):858-870.
20. Menendez M., Benach J., Muntaner C., et al. Is precarious employment more damaging to women's health than men's?. Social Science & Medicine 2007, 64(4):776-781.
21. D'Costa A.P. Uneven and combined development: understanding India's software exports. World Development 2003, 31(1):211-226.
22. Torres C.A., Schugurensky D. The political economy of higher education in the era of neoliberal globalization: Latin America in comparative perspective. Higher Education 2002, 43(4):429-455.
23. Cheung K.C., Leung H.M., Wong M.H. Metal concentrations of common freshwater and marine fish from the Pearl River Delta, south China. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 2008, 4:705-715.
24. Renkow M. Differential technology adoption and income-distribution in Pakistan - implications for research resource-allocation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1993, 75(1):33-43.
25. Alam G.M. The role of science and technology education at network age population for sustainable development of Bangladesh through human resource advancement. Scientific Research and Essays 2009, 4(11):1260-1270.
26. Debruyne M., Reibstein D.J. Competitor see, competitor do: incumbent entry in new market niches. Marketing Science 2005, 24(1):55-66.
27. Van Raan A.F.J. The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. Technikfolgenabschätzung, Theorie und Praxis 2003, 12(1):20-29.
28. Pillania R.K., Fetscherin M. Multinationals and emerging markets guest editorial. Multinational Business Review 2009, 17(2):1-9.
29. Thorleuchter D., Van den Poel D., Prinzie A. A compared R&D-based and patent-based cross impact analysis for identifying relationships between technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2010, 77(7):1037-1050.