A royalty negotiation model for BOT (build-operate-transfer) projects: The operational revenue-based model

Mathematical and Computer Modelling

Volumn 54, Issue 9-10, 2011, Pages 2338-2347

  Kang, Chao Chung ^a   Feng, Cheng Min ^b   Kuo, Chiu Yen ^b  

^a PROVIDENCE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Bi level programming; BOT project; Negotiation; Royalty

Indexed keywords

BI-LEVEL PROGRAMMING; BOT PROJECT; BUILD , OPERATE AND TRANSFERS; BUILD OPERATE TRANSFERS; CONCESSION CONTRACTS; CONTAINER LOGISTICS; DISCOUNT RATES; ITERATIVE ALGORITHM; LEARNING RATES; MATLAB PROGRAMMING; NEGOTIATION; NEGOTIATION MODELS; NEGOTIATION PROCESS; OBJECTIVE FUNCTION VALUES; OPERATING REVENUES; PRIVATE SECTORS; RECOVERY RATE; ROYALTY; TIME VALUES;

ALGORITHMS; ITERATIVE METHODS;

COMMERCE;

EID: 80051593457     PISSN: 08957177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.05.042     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Walker C., Smith A.J. Privatized Infrastructure: The Build Operate Transfer Approach 1996, Thomas Telford Publication.
2. Kang C.C., Feng C.M., Haider A.Khan. Risk assessment for build-operate-transfer projects: a dynamic multi-objective programming approach. Computers and Operations Research 2005, 32(6):1633-1654.
3. Tiong L.K., Alum J. Final negotiation in competitive BOT tender. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 1997, 123(1):6-10.
4. Chiou Y.C., Lan W.L. The royalty models for transport infrastructure BOT projects. Transpormetrica 2006, 2(3):175-197.
5. Public Construction Commission, Report of Financial Planning of the Private Participation in Infrastructure, Department of Public Construction Commission, 2001.
6. Shen L.Y., Bao H.J., Lu W.S. Using bargaining-game theory for negotiating concession period for BOT-type contract. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2007, 133(5):385-392.
7. Xing W., Wu F.F. A game-theoretical model of private power production. Electric Power and Energy Systems 2001, 23:213-218.
8. Yang H., Meng Q. Highway pricing and capacity in a road network under a build-operate-transfer scheme. Transportation Research Part A 2000, 34:207-222.
9. Kang C.C., Feng C.M., Huang S.C. The new finance model of BOT projects. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 2003, 5:2920-2931.
10. C.C. Kang, C.M. Feng, S.C. Huang, A new financial engineering model for analyzing the royalty of BOT projects: the Taiwan case. CD-ROMP, in: IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Singapore, 2007, pp. 277-281.
11. Ranasinghe M. Private sector participation in infrastructure projects: a methodology to analyze viability of BOT. Construction Management and Economics 1999, 17:613-623.
12. Chang L.M., Chen P.H. BOT financial model: Taiwan high speed rail case. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2001, 127(3):214-222.
13. Farrell M. Financial engineering in project management. Project Management Journal 2001, 33(1):27-36.
14. Chen A., Subprasom K., Chootinan P. Assessing financial feasibility of build-operate-transfer project under uncertain demand. Transportation Research Record 2001, 1771:124-131.
15. Lin Y.S., Chang Y.H. A study of nonlinear negotiation model for build-operate-transfer infrastructure projects: the case of negative utility resource distribution. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Transportation 2005, 17(1):27-64. (in Chinese).
16. Cross J.G. A theory of the bargaining process. American Economic Review 1965, 55(1):67-94.
17. Chen A., Subprasom K. Analysis of regulation and policy of private toll roads in a build-operate-transfer scheme under demand uncertainty. Transportation Research Part A 2007, 41:537-558.
18. Houba H. The policy bargaining model. Journal of Mathematical Economics 1997, 28:1-27.
19. Bard J.F. Practical Bilevel Optimization Algorithms and Application 2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. Wen U.P., Hsu S.T. Linear bi-level programming problem: a review. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1991, 42(2):125-135.
21. Liu Y.H., Stephen M.H. Characterizing an optimal solution to the linear bi-level programming problem. European Journal of Operational Research 1994, 73(1):164-166.
22. Calvete H.I., Gale C., Mateo P.M. A new approach for solving linear bi-level problems using genetic algorithm. European Journal of Operation Research 2008, 188:14-28.
23. Terms of Reference (TOR) of Concessions of the Container Terminal in Taipei Port issued by Keelung Harbor Bureau in 2000, MOTC, Taipei, 2000.