Protecting food safety: More needs to be done to keep pace with scientific advances and the changing food supply

Health Affairs

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 915-923

  Olson, Erik D ^a  

^a PEW CHARITABLE TRUSTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

4,4' ISOPROPYLIDENEDIPHENOL; AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL; ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; COAL; ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL; FOOD ADDITIVE; MERCURY; PESTICIDE;

ACT; AIR POLLUTANT; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ARTICLE; CAMPYLOBACTER; CHILD HEALTH; DRUG USE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; FOOD HANDLING; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD INTAKE; FOOD POISONING; FOOD PROCESSING; FOOD QUALITY; FOOD QUALITY PROTECTION ACT; FOOD SAFETY; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH HAZARD; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; LAW; MEAT; NONHUMAN; ORGANIZATION; POPULATION RISK; POULTRY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PRODUCT SAFETY; SALMONELLA; UNITED STATES; WATER CONTAMINATION; WATER POLLUTANT;

DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; FOOD ADDITIVES; FOOD CONTAMINATION; FOOD INSPECTION; FOOD SAFETY; FOOD SUPPLY; FOOD-PROCESSING INDUSTRY; FOODBORNE DISEASES; HUMANS; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 80051520511     PISSN: 02782715     EISSN: 15445208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.1265     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson MA, Roy SL, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States-major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(1):7-15.
2. Scallan E, Griffin PM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Hoekstra RM. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States-unspecified agents. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(1):16-22.
3. Lindsay JA. Chronic sequelae of foodborne disease. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;3(4):443-52.
4. Danaei G, Ding EL, Mozaffarian D, Taylor B, Rehm J, Murray CJ, et al. The preventable causes of death in the United States: comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors. PLoS Med. 2009;6(4):e1000058.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sodium fact sheet [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): CDC; [cited 2011 Feb 13] Available from: http:// www.cdc.gov/dhdsp/data_ statistics/fact_sheets/fs_sodium .htm
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Americans consume too much sodium (salt) [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): CDC; [cited 2011 Feb 13]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ Features/dsSodium/
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trans fat [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): CDC; [cited 2011 Feb 13]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ nutrition/everyone/basics/fat/ transfat.html
8. Food and Drug Administration.What you need to know about mercury in fish and shellfish [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): FDA; 2004 [last updated 2009 Sep 17; cited 2011 Feb 13]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/productspecificinformation/ seafood/food bornepathogenscontaminants/ methylmercury/ucm115662.htm
9. National Research Council. Pesticides in the diets of infants and children.Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 1993.
10. Payne-Sturges D, Cohen J, Castorina R, Axelrad DA, Woodruff TJ. Evaluating cumulative organophosphorus pesticide body burden of children: a national case study. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(20):7924-30.
11. Braun JM, Hauser R. Bisphenol A and children's health. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011;23(2):233-9.
12. Groff T. Bisphenol A: invisible pollution. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010; 22(4):524-9.
13. Golub MS, Wu KL, Kaufman FL, Li LH, Moran-Messen F, Zeise L, et al. Bisphenol A: developmental toxicity from early prenatal exposure. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2010;89(6):441-66.
14. National Toxicology Program, Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction. NTP-CERHR monograph on the potential human reproductive and developmental effects of bisphenol A [Internet]. Research Triangle Park (NC): NTP; 2008 Sep [cited 2010 Dec 10]. Available from http://cerhr.niehs .nih.gov/evals/bisphenol/bisphenol .pdf
15. Arnich N, Canivenc-Lavier MC, Kolf-Clauw M, Coffigny H, Cravedi JP, Grob K, et al. Conclusions of the French Food Safety Agency on the toxicity of bisphenol A. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2011 Jan 7. [Epub ahead of print].
16. Robinson RA. Food safety and security: fundamental changes needed to ensure safe food; testimony before the Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, Restructuring, and the District of Columbia, Committee on Governmental Affairs, US Senate [Internet]. Washington (DC): Government Accountability Office; 2001 Oct 10 [cited 2011 Mar 23]. Available from: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0247t.pdf
17. Government Accountability Office. Federal food safety oversight: food safety working group is a positive first step but governmentwide planning is needed to address fragmentation [Internet]. Washington (DC): GAO; 2011 Mar [cited 2011 April 5]. Available from: http://www.gao .gov/new.items/d11289.pdf
18. Food Additives Amendment to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, Pub. L. No. 85-929; 1958. Secs. 201(s) and 409.
19. It should be noted that the studies in this and Note 20 were based on earlier, higher estimates from the CDC of the number of people affected by foodborne disease. Scharff RL. Health-related costs from foodborne illness in the United States [Internet]. Washington (DC): Produce Safety Project, Georgetown University; 2010 [cited 2011 Feb 20]. Available from: http://www.produce safetyproject.org/admin/assets/ files/Health-Related-Foodborne-Illness-Costs-Report.pdf-1.pdf
20. Roberts T. WTP estimates of the societal costs of food-borne illness. Amer. J Agr Econ. 2007;89(5): 1183-8.
21. Tauxe RV. Emerging foodborne diseases: an evolving public health challenge. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997; 3(4):425-34.
22. Steele M, Odumeru J. Irrigation water as source of foodborne pathogens on fruit and vegetables. J Food Prot. 2004;67(12):2839-49.
23. Erickson M, Critzer F, Doyle M. Composting criteria for animal manure [Internet]. Washington (DC): Produce Safety Project, Georgetown University; 2010 [cited 2010 Dec 15]. (Issue Brief). Available from: http://www.producesafety project.org/admin/assets/files/ PEW-PSP-Composting-Manure-Narrative-v4-2.pdf
24. Sheridan JJ. Sources of contamination during slaughter and measures for control. J Food Safety. 1998; 18(4):321-39.
25. Dirty birds: even "premium" chickens harbor dangerous bacteria. Consum Rep. 2007;72(1):20-3.
26. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service. Nationwide federal plant raw ground beef microbiological survey: August 1993-March 1994 [Internet]. Washington (DC): USDA; 1996 Apr [cited 2010 Nov 29]. Available from: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/OPHS/ baseline/rwgrbeef.pdf
27. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service. Nationwide raw ground turkey microbiological survey [Internet]. Washington (DC): USDA; 1996 May [cited 2010 Nov 29]. Available from: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/OPHS/ baseline/rwgrturk.pdf
28. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service. Foodborne illness: what consumers need to know [Internet]. Washington (DC): USDA; [last modified 2006 Apr 3; cited 2010 Dec 8]. (Fact Sheet). Available from: http:// www.fsis.usda.gov/factsheets/Food borne_Illness_What_Consumers_ Need_to_Know/index.asp
29. Shea KM, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Environmental Health, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases. Nontherapeutic use of antimicrobial agents in animal agriculture: implications for pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2004;114(3):862-8.
30. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Veterinary Medicine. 2009 summary report on antimicrobials sold or distributed for use in food-producing animals [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): FDA; 2010 [cited 2010 Dec 15]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ ForIndustry/UserFees/Animal DrugUserFeeActADUFA/ UCM231851.pdf
31. Mellon M, Benbrook C, Lutz Benbrook K. Hogging it: estimates of antimicrobial abuse in livestock [Internet]. Cambridge (MA): Union of Concerned Scientists; 2001 Jan; [cited 2011 Apr 7]. Available from: http://www.ucsusa .org/assets/documents/food_and_ agriculture/hog_front.pdf
32. Institute of Medicine. Human health risks with the subtherapeutic use of penicillin or tetracyclines in animal feed. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 1989.
33. Khan A. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Health, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, hearing on antibiotic resistance and the use of antibiotics in animal agriculture [Internet]. Washington (DC): The Subcommittee; 2010 Jul 14 [cited 2011 Mar 24]. Available from: http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/documents/20100714/Khan.Testim ony.07.14.2010.pdf
34. Sharfstein JM. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Health, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, hearing on antibiotic resistance and the use of antibiotics in animal agriculture [Internet]. Washington (DC): The Subcommittee; 2010 Jul 14 [cited 2011 Mar 24]. Available from: http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/documents/20100714/Sharfstein. Testimony.07.14.2010.pdf
35. Clifford J. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Health, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, hearing on antibiotic resistance and the use of antibiotics in animal agriculture [Internet]. Washington (DC): The Subcommittee; 2010 [cited 2011 Mar 24]. Available from: http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/documents/20100714/Clifford Testimony.07.14.2010.pdf
36. World Health Organization. Use of antimicrobials outside human medicine and resultant antimicrobial resistance in humans. Geneva: WHO; 2002. (Fact Sheet 268).
37. American Meat Institute. Antibiotic use in livestock production: ensuring meat safety [Internet]. Washington (DC): AMI; 2010 Feb [cited 2010 Dec 8]. (AMI Fact Sheet). Available from: http://www.meatami.com/ht/a/GetDocument Action/i/56994
38. Euromonitor International Outlook of US Food Products Consumption And Export Trends. 2010 Food Export Marketing Forum [Internet]. Chicago (IL): Euromonitor; [cited 2011 April 28]. Available from: http://fea.files.cms-plus.com/ Presentations/Outlook%20for% 20Global%20Food%20Trade.pdf
39. National Toxicology Program, Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction. NTP-CERHR monograph on the potential human reproductive and developmental effects of di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) [Internet]. Research Triangle Park (NC): NTP; [cited 2010 Dec 8]. Available from: http://cerhr.niehs .nih.gov/evals/phthalates/dbp/ DBP_Monograph_Final.pdf
40. Food and Drug Administration. Update on bisphenol A for use in food contact applications: January 2010 [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): FDA; 2010 [cited 2011 Feb 21]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/News Events/PublicHealthFocus/ucm 197739.htm#studies
41. Polycarbonate/BPA Global Group. About bisphenol [Internet]. Washington (DC): BPA Global Group; [cited 2011 Feb 12]. Available from: http://www.bisphenol-a.org/about/index.html
42. European Food Safety Authority [Internet]. Parma (Italy): EFSA; c2010. Press release, EFSA updates advice on bisphenol A; 2010 Sep 30 [cited 2011 Feb 15]. Available from: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/cef100930.htm
43. American Chemistry Council. Phthalates information center [Internet]. Washington (DC): The Council; [cited 2011 Feb 12]. Available from: http://www.americanchemistry.com/s_phthalate/index .asp
44. Environmental Protection Agency. Mercury: controlling power plant emissions: overview [Internet]. Washington (DC): EPA; [last updated 2010 Oct 1; cited 2011 Apr 5]. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/hg/control_emissions/index.htm
45. Mahan S, Warner K. Hidden costs: reduced IQ from chlor-alkali plant mercury emissions harms the economy [Internet]. Washington (DC): Oceana; 2009 May [cited 2011 Apr 5]. Available from: http://na.oceana.org/sites/default/files/reports/Hidden_Costs.pdf
46. European Commission. An economic and environmental analysis of the chlor-alkali production process: mercury cells and alternative technologies [Internet]. Brussels: EC; 1997 Jun 30 [cited 2011 Apr 5]. Available from: http://www.chem.unep.ch/mercury/2001-ngo-sub/eurochlor/sub1ngoatt6.pdf
47. US Geological Survey. Mercury in the environment [Internet]. Reston (VA): USGS; 2000 Oct [cited 2010 Dec 8]. (Fact Sheet No. 146-00). Available from: http://www.usgs .gov/themes/factsheet/146-00/
48. Selin NE, Sunderland EM, Knightes CD, Mason RP. Sources of mercury exposure for US seafood consumers: implications for policy. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118:137-43.
49. Hintelmann H. Organomercurials: their formation and pathways in the environment. Met Ions Life Sci. 2010;7:365-401.
50. Environmental Protection Agency. Fish consumption advisories [Internet]. Washington (DC): EPA; [cited 2010 Dec 10]. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/hg/advisories.htm
51. Department of Agriculture. Pesticide Data Program: annual summary, calendar year 2008 [Internet]. Washington (DC): USDA; 2009 Dec [cited 3011 Mar 24]. Available from: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5081750
52. Baker BP, Benbrook CM, Groth E 3rd, Lutz Benbrook K. Pesticide residues in conventional, integrated pest management (IPM)-grown and organic foods: insights from three US data sets. Food Addit Contam. 2002;19(5):427-46.
53. Waxman H. Fact sheet: weaknesses in FDA's food safety system [Internet]. Washington (DC): House of Representatives; 2006 [cited 2010 Dec 12]. Available from: http:// www.henrywaxman.house.gov/ UploadedFiles/FDA_Food_Safety_ Fact_Sheet.pdf
54. Government Accountability Office. Food safety: improvements needed in FDA oversight of fresh produce [Internet]. Washington (DC): GAO; [cited 2011 Mar 24]. Available from: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d081047.pdf
55. Cohen R. Lacking resources, FDA inspects less than 1 percent of imports. San Diego Union Tribune. 2007 Jun 13.
56. Food and Drug Administration. Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): FDA; [last updated 2009 Jul 20; cited 2010 Dec 8]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/ food/foodsafety/hazardanalysis criticalcontrolpointshaccp/ default.htm
57. Vogt DU. Food additive regulations: a chronology [Internet].Washington (DC): Congressional Research Service; 1995 Sep 13 [cited 2010 Dec 8]. Available from: http://ncseonline .org/nle/crsreports/pesticides/ pest-5.cfm
58. House of Representatives, Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. Committee report, H.R. Rep. No. 85-2284 (1958 Jul 28).
59. Fortin ND. Food regulation: law, science, policy, and practice. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2009.
60. Government Accountability Office. Food safety: FDA should strengthen its oversight of food ingredients determined to be generally recognized as safe (GRAS) [Internet]. Washington (DC): GAO; 2010 Feb [cited 2011 Mar 24]. Available from: http:// www.gao.gov/new.items/d10246 .pdf
61. Borrell B. Toxicology: the big test for bisphenol A. Nature. 2010;464: 1122-4.
62. Environmental Protection Agency. Accomplishments under the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) [Internet]. Washington (DC): EPA; 2006 Aug 3 [cited 2010 Dec 10]. Available from: http://www.epa .gov/pesticides/regulating/laws/ fqpa/fqpa_accomplishments.htm
63. Schierow L-J. Pesticide residue regulation: analysis of Food Quality Protection Act implementation [Internet]. Washington (DC): Congressional Research Service; 1999 Aug 3 [cited 2010 Dec 14]. Available from: http://ncseonlineorg/NLE/CRS/abstract.cfm? NLEid=1530
64. Consumers Union. A report card for the EPA: successes and failures in implementing the Food Quality Protection Act [Internet]. Yonkers (NY): Consumers Union; 2001 Feb [cited 2010 Dec 14]. Available from: http://www.consumersunion.org/ pdf/fqpa/ReportCard_final.pdf
65. Codex Alimentarius [home page on the Internet]. Rome: Codex; [cited 2011 Feb 12]. Available from: http:// www.codexalimentarius.net/web/ index_en.jsp
66. Codex Alimentarius. JECFA: The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives [home page on the Internet]. Rome: Codex; [cited 2011 Apr 11]. Available from: http:// www.codexalimentarius.net/web/ jecfa.jsp
67. Food Safety Enhancement Act, H.R. 2749, 111th Cong., 1st Sess. (2009).
68. Sundlof SF. Statement before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives. Washington (DC): The Subcommittee; 2009 Feb 11 [cited 2011 Mar 24]. Available from: http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/Press_111/20090211/ testimony_sundlof.pdf
69. Supreme Beef Processors, Inc. v. USDA, 275 F.3d 432 (5th Cir. 2001).
70. Single Food Safety Agency Act of 2010, H.R. 6552, 111th Cong., 2nd Sess. (2010).
71. FDA Science Board, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, Subcommittee on Science and Technology. FDA science and mission at risk: report of the Subcommittee on Science and Technology [Internet]. Washington (DC): FDA; 2007 Nov [cited 2011 Apr 5]. Available from http://www.fda.gov/ ohrms/dockets/ac/07/briefing/ 2007-4329b_02_01_ FDA%20Report%20on%20Science %20and%20Technology.pdf
72. Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act, H.R. 1549, 111th Cong., 1st Sess. (2009).
73. Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act, S. 619, 111th Cong., 1st Sess. (2009).
74. Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act, H.R. 965, 112th Cong., 1st Sess. (2011).
75. Food and Drug Administration. Draft guidance: the judicious use of medically important antimicrobial drugs in food-producing animals. Fed Regist. 2010;75(124):37450-1.
76. Water Infrastructure Financing Act, S. 1005, 111th Cong., 1st Session (2009).
77. Environmental Protection Agency. CAFO rule history [Internet]. Washington (DC): EPA; [last updated 2008 Dec 29; cited 2011 Feb 20]. Available from: http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/afo/aforule.cfm
78. Environmental Protection Agency. Controlling power plant emissions: chronology [Internet]. Washington (DC): EPA; [last updated 2010 Oct 1; cited 2011 Feb 21]. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/hg/control_ emissions/decision.htm
79. US Senate, Committee on Environment and Public Works. Full committee and Subcommittee on Clean Air and Nuclear Safety joint hearing entitled, "Legislative Hearing: S. 2995, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 2010" [Internet]. Washington (DC): The Committee; 2010 Mar 4 [cited 2011 Mar 25]. Available from: http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings .Hearing&Hearing_ID=0780a976-802a-23ad-42f3-03e35b75a30a
80. Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production. Putting meat on the table: industrial farm animal production in America [Internet]. Washington (DC): Pew Charitable Trusts; 2008. [cited 2011 Feb 21]. Available from: http://www.ncifap.org/index.html
81. Clean Water Network. Legislative and administrative H20 priorities [Internet]. Washington (DC): The Network; 2009 Jan [cited 2011 Feb 21]. Available from: http://www.cleanwaternetwork.org/sites/default/files/CWN_Priorities.pdf