Minimizing the process time for ultrafiltration/diafiltration under gel polarization conditions

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 380, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 148-154

  Paulen, R ^a   Foley, G ^b   Fikar, M ^a   Kovacs Z ^c   Czermak, P ^c,d  

^a SLOVAK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Slovakia)

^b DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

^c TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE MITTELHESSEN   (Germany)

^d Kansas State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Diafiltration; Dynamic optimization; Gel polarization; Pontryagin's minimum principle; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL RESULTS; DECISION MAKERS; DIAFILTRATION; DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION; GEL POLARIZATION; GEL-POLARIZATION MODEL; NORMALIZED MODEL; NUMERICAL COMPUTATIONS; OPTIMAL CONTROL PROBLEM; OPTIMAL CONTROL STRATEGY; OPTIMAL CONTROL THEORY; OPTIMAL CONTROLS; PERMEATE FLUX; PONTRYAGIN'S MINIMUM PRINCIPLES; PROCESS TIME; THEORETICAL INVESTIGATIONS; TIME VARYING; TREATMENT TIME; UTILIZATION STRATEGY;

CONTROL; GELS; NUMERICAL METHODS; OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; POLARIZATION; ULTRAFILTRATION;

OPTIMIZATION;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); DIAFILTRATION; DILUTION; GEL; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PERMEABILITY; POLARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THEORETICAL STUDY; TIME; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 80051473505     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.06.044     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Schu P., Mitra G. Ultrafiltration membranes in the vaccine industry. Membrane Separations in Biotechnology 2001, 225-243. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. 2nd edition. W.K. Wang (Ed.).
2. Cheang B., Zydney A.L. A two-stage ultrafiltration process for fractionation of whey protein isolate. Journal of Membrane Science 2004, 231(1-2):159-167.
3. Jaffrin M., Charrier J. Optimization of ultrafiltration and diafiltration processes for albumin production. Journal of Membrane Science 1994, 97:71-81.
4. Belhocine D., Grib H., Abdessmed D., Comeau Y., Mameri N. Optimization of plasma proteins concentration by ultrafiltration. Journal of Membrane Science 1998, 142(2):159-171.
5. Li Z., Youravong W., H-Kittikun A. Separation of proteases from yellowfin tuna spleen by ultrafiltration. Bioresource Technology 2006, 97(18):2364-2370.
6. Veide A., Lindbäck T., Enfors S.-O. Recovery of β-galactosidase from a poly (ethylene glycol) solution by diafiltration. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 1989, 11(11):744-751.
7. wall ultrafiltration process control. Journal of Membrane Science 1997, 130(1-2):123-140.
8. R. Luo, R. Waghmare, M. Krishnan, C. Adams, E. Poon, D. Kahn, Process optimization for the ultrafiltration/diafiltration of abthrax antibody to very high final concentrations, Tech. Rep. PS1240EN00, Millipore Technical Publications, Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA 01821, USA, 2004.
9. Basso R.C., Gonçalves L.A.G., Grimaldi R., Viotto L.A. Degumming and production of soy lecithin, and the cleaning of a ceramic membrane used in the ultrafiltration and diafiltration of crude soybean oil. Journal of Membrane Science 2009, 330(1-2):127-134.
10. Dutré B., Trägårdh G., et al. Macrosolute-microsolute separation by ultrafiltration: a review of diafiltration processes and applications. Desalination 1994, 95(3):227-267.
11. Simon A., Vandanjon L., Levesque G., Bourseau P. Concentration and desalination of fish gelatin by ultrafiltration and continuous diafiltration processes. Desalination 2002, 144(1-3):313-318.
12. A.L. Zydney, R. van Reis, High-performance tangential-flow filtration, in: Membrane Separations in Biotechnology, 2nd edition, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 2001, pp. 277-299.
13. Millipore, Co., Protein concentration and diafiltration by tangential flow filtration-an overview, Tech. Rep. TB032 Rev. C 06/03 03-117, Millipore Technical Publications, Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA 01821, USA, 2003.
14. Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook 1998, CRC Press, FL, USA.
15. Foley G. Ultrafiltration with variable volume diafiltration: a novel approach to water saving in diafiltration processes. Desalination 2006, 199(1-3):220-221.
16. Foley G. Water usage in variable volume diafiltration: comparison with ultrafiltration and constant volume diafiltration. Desalination 2006, 196:160-163.
17. Ng P., Lundblad J., Mitra G. Optimization of solute separation by diafiltration. Separation Science and Technology 1976, 11(5):499-502.
18. Foley G. Evaluation of variable volume diafiltration using the logarithmic integral. Desalination and Water Treatment 2011, 25:286-290.
19. H. Lutz, Membrane filtration with optimized performance, Patent WO/1996/034679, proprietor: Millipore Investment Holdings Limited, Wilmington, DE, US, November 1996.
20. H. Lutz, Membrane filtration with optimized addition of second liquid to maximize flux, United States Patent 5597486, assignee: Millipore Investment Holdings Limited, Wilmington, DE, US, January 1997.
21. Fikar M., Kovács Z., Czermak P. Dynamic optimization of batch diafiltration processes. Journal of Membrane Science 2010, 355(1-2):168-174.
22. Paulen R., Fikar M., Kovács Z., Czermak P. Process optimization of diafiltration with time-dependent water adding for albumin production. Chemical Engineering and Processing 2011.
23. Michaelis A.S. New separation technique for the CPI. Chemical Engineering Progress 1968, 64(12):31-43.
24. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology 1996, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
25. Élysée-Collen B., Lencki R.W. Protein ultrafiltration concentration polarization layer flux resistance: I. Importance of protein layer morphology on flux decline with gelatin. Journal of Membrane Science 1997, 129(1):101-113.
26. Ma S., Kassinos S.C., Kassinos D. Direct simulation of the limiting flux: I. Interpretation of the experimental results. Journal of Membrane Science 2009, 337(1-2):81-91.
27. Yazdanshenas M., Tabatabaeenezhad A., Roostaazad R., Khoshfetrat A. Full scale analysis of apple juice ultrafiltration and optimization of diafiltration. Separation and Purification Technology 2005, 47(1-2):52-57.
28. L. Schwartz, Diafiltration: a fast, efficient method for desalting, or buffer exchange of biological samples, Tech. Rep. PN 33289, Pall Corporation, Pall Life Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI 48103-9019, USA, 2003.
29. Meireles M., Aimar P., Sanchez V. Albumin denaturation during ultrafiltration: effects of operating conditions and consequences on membrane fouling. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 1991, 38(5):528-534.
30. Bacchin P., Aimar P., Field R.W. Critical and sustainable fluxes: theory, experiments and applications. Journal of Membrane Science 2006, 281(1-2):42-69.
31. Shao J., Zydney A.L. Optimization of ultrafiltration/diafiltration processes for partially bound impurities. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2004, 87(3):286-292.
32. Pinto S.I.S., Miranda J.M., Campos J. Use of hybrid membrane cells to improve the apparent selectivity in the fractionation of two components: computational fluid dynamics study. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2010, 49(20):9978-9987.
33. Srinivasan B., Palanki S., Bonvin D. Dynamic optimization of batch processes: I. Characterization of the nominal solution. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2003, 27(1):1-26.
34. Fleming W.H., Rishel R.W. Deterministic and Stochastic Optimal Control 1975, Springer Verlag.
35. Pontryagin L.S., Boltyanskii V.G., Gamkrelidze R.V., Mishchenko E.F. The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes 1962, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
36. Bryson A.E., Ho Y.C. Applied Optimal Control 1975, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
37. Goh C.J., Teo K.L. Control parameterization: a unified approach to optimal control problems with general constraints. Automatica 1988, 24(1):3-18.
38. Vassiliadis V.S., Sargent R.W.H., Pantelides C.C. Solution of a class of multistage dynamic optimization problems. 1. Problems without path constraints, 2. problems with path constraints. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 1994, 33:2111-2122. 2123-2133.
39. Balsa-Canto E., Banga J.R., Alonso A.A., Vassiliadis V.S. Dynamic optimization of chemical and biochemical processes using restricted second-order information. Computers and Chemical Engineering 2001, 25(4-6):539-546.
40. M. Fikar, M.A. Latifi, User's guide for FORTRAN dynamic optimisation code DYNO, Tech. Rep. mf0201, LSGC CNRS, Nancy, France; STU Bratislava, Slovak Republic, 2002.
41. Hirmajer T., Fikar M. Optimal control of a two-stage reactor system. Chemical Papers 2006, 60(5):381-387.
42. Souza R.R., Bergamasco R., da Costa S.C., Feng X., Faria S.H.B., Gimenes M.L. Recovery and purification of lactose from whey. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification 2010, 49(11):1137-1143.