Use of hybrid membrane cells to improve the apparent selectivity in the fractionation of two components: Computational fluid dynamics study

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 49, Issue 20, 2010, Pages 9978-9987

  Pinto, S I S ^a   Miranda, J M ^a   Campos, J B L M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS; BOVINE SERUM ALBUMINS; CONCENTRATION FIELDS; DEPOLARIZATION EFFECTS; FEED STREAMS; HYBRID MEMBRANE; MASS TRANSPORT EQUATION; MEMBRANE CELLS; NAVIER STOKES; OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY; PERMEABLE MEMBRANES; RETENTATE; SEPARATION PROCESS; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES; TWO-COMPONENT;

BODY FLUIDS; CELLS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CYTOLOGY; DEXTRAN; GLUCOSE; HYDRAULICS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL METHODS; SOLUTIONS;

MEMBRANES;

EID: 77958014680     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: 15205045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie100152y     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Gosh, R. Protein bioseparation using ultrafiltration-Theory, applications and new developments; Imperial College Press: London, 2003.
2. Brans, G.; Schroen, C. G. P. H.; van der Sman, R. G. M.; Boom, R. M. Membrane fractionation of milk: state of the art and challenges J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 243, 263
3. Saksena, S.; Zydney, A. L. Effect of solution pH and ionic strength on the separation of albumin from immunoglobulins (IgG) by selective filtration Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1993, 43, 960
4. Ghosh, R.; Cui, Z. F. Fractionation of BSA and lysozyme using ultrafiltration: effect of pH and membrane pretreatment J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 139, 17
5. Frank, B. P.; Belfort, G. Polysaccharides and sticky membrane surfaces: critical ionic effects J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 212, 205
6. Müller, C. H.; Agarwal, G. P.; Melin, Th.; Wintgens, Th. Study of ultrafiltration of a single and binary protein solution in a thin spiral channel module J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 227, 51
7. Li, Q. Y.; Cui, Z. F.; Pepper, D. S. Fractionation of HSA and IgG by gas sparged ultrafiltration J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 136, 181
8. Ghosh, R.; Li, Q.; Cui, Z. Fractionation of BSA and lysozyme using ultrafiltration: Effect of gas sparging AIChE J. 1998, 44, 61
9. van Reis, R.; Gadam, S.; Frautschy, L. N.; Orlando, S.; Goodrich, E. M.; Saksena, S.; Kuriyel, R.; Simpson, C. M.; Pearl, S.; Zydney, A. L. High-performance tangential flow filtration using charged membranes Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1997, 56, 71
10. Wan, Y.; Ghosh, R.; Cui, Z. High-resolution plasma protein fractionation using ultrafiltration Desalination 2002, 144, 301
11. Christy, C.; Adams, G.; Kuriyel, R.; Bolton, G.; Seilly, A. High-performance tangential flow filtration: a highly selective membrane separation process Desalination 2002, 144, 133
12. Agarwal, G. R. Analysis of proteins transmission in vortex flow ultrafilter for mass transfer coefficient J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 136, 141
13. Kaur, J.; Agarwal, G. P. Studies on protein transmission in thin channel flow module: the role of Dean vortices for improving mass transfer J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 196, 1
14. Balakrishnan, M.; Agarwal, G. P. Protein fractionation in a vortex flow filter. I: Effect of system hydrodynamics and solution environment on single protein transmission J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 112, 47
15. Al-Bastaki, N.; Abbas, A. Use of fluid instabilities to enhance membrane performance: a review Desalination 2001, 136, 255
16. Chung, K. Y.; Belfort, G.; Edelstein, W. A.; Li, X. Dean vortices in curved tube flow: 5. 3-d MRI and numerical analysis in the velocity field AIChE J. 1993, 39, 1592
17. Kennedy, T. J.; Merson, R. L.; McCoy, B. J. Improving permeation flux by pulsed reverse osmosis Chem. Eng. Sci. 1974, 29, 1927
18. Wang, W.; Bertram, C. D.; Wiley, D. E. Effects of collapsible-tube- induced pulsation vigour on membrane filtration performance J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 288, 298
19. Hadzismajlovic, D. E.; Bertram, C. D. Flux enhancement in laminar crossflow microfiltration using a collapsible-tube pulsation generator J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 142, 173
20. Li, H.; Bertram, C. D.; Wiley, D. E. Mechanisms by which pulsatile flow affects cross-flow microfiltration AIChE J. 1998, 44, 1951
21. Blanpain-Avet, P.; Doubrovine, N.; Lafforgue, C.; Lalande, M. The effect of oscillatory flow on crossflow microfiltration of beer in a tubular mineral membrane system-Membrane fouling resistance decrease and energetic considerations J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 152, 151
22. Poyen, S.; Quemeneur, F.; Baroiu, B.; Desille, M. Improvement of the flux of permeate in ultrafiltration by turbulence promoters Int. Chem. Eng. 1987, 27, 441
23. Miranda, J. M.; Campos, J. B. L. M. Numerical study of a hybrid membrane cell with semi and fully permeable membrane sub-sections Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007, 62, 1215
24. Pinto, S. I. S.; Rocha, T. M. G. T.; Miranda, J. M.; Campos, J. B. L. M. A new membrane fractionation process based on the combination of hybrid membrane cells and differential diffusion of two solutes Desalination 2009, 241, 372
25. Kuberkar, V. T.; Davis, R. H. Microfiltration of protein-cell mixtures with crossflushing or backflushing J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 183, 1
26. Levesley, J.; Hoare, M. The effect of high frequency backflushing on the microfiltration of yeast homogenate suspensions for the recovery of soluble proteins J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 158, 29
27. Wilharm, C.; Rodgers, V. G. J. Significance of duration and amplitude in transmembrane pressure pulsed ultrafiltration of binary protein mixtures J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 121, 217
28. Mores, W. D.; Bowman, C. N.; Davis, R. H. Theoretical and experimental flux maximization by optimization of backpulsing J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 165, 225
29. Opong, W. S.; Zydney, A. L. Diffusive and Convective Protein Transport through Asymmetric Membranes AIChE J. 1991, 37, 1497
30. Afonso, A.; Miranda, J. M.; Campos, J. B. L. M. Numerical study of BSA ultrafiltration in the limiting flux regime effect of variable physical properties Desalination 2009, 249, 1139
31. Miranda, J. M.; Campos, J. B. L. M. An improved scheme to study mass transfer over a separation membrane J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 188, 49
32. Laurent, T. C.; Sundelof, L.-O.; Wik, K. O.; Warmegard, B. Diffusion of Dextran in concentrated solutions Eur. J. Biochem. 1976, 68, 95
33. De, S.; Bhattacharya, P. K. Mass transfer coefficient with suction including property variations in applications of cross-flow ultrafiltration Sep. Purif. Technol. 1999, 16, 61
34. Jonsson, G. Boundary layer phenomena during ultrafiltration of dextran and whey protein solutions Desalination 1984, 51, 61
35. Leung, W.; Probstein, R. F. Low polarization in laminar ultrafiltration of macromolecular solutions Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1979, 18, 274
36. Gill, W. N.; Wiley, D. E.; Fell, C. J. D.; Fane, A. C. Effects of viscosity on concentration polarization in ultrafiltration AIChE J. 1988, 34, 1563
37. Field, R.; Aimar, P. Ideal limiting fluxes in ultrafiltration: comparison of various theoretical relationships J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 80, 107
38. Deen, W. M. Hindered Transport of Large Molecules in Liquid-Filled Pores AIChE J. 1987, 33, 1409
39. Tencer, M.; Charbonneau, R.; Lahoud, N.; Berini, P. AFM study of BSA adlayers on Au stripes Appl. Surf. Sci. 2007, 253, 9209
40. Granath, K. A.; Kvist, B. E. Molecular weight distribution analysis by gel chromatography on Sephadex J. Chromatogr. 1967, 28, 69
41. Miranda, J. M.; Campos, J. B. L. M. Concentration polarisation in a membrane placed under an impinging jet confined by a conical wall-a numerical approach J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 182, 257
42. Belfort, G.; Nagata, N. Fluid mechanics and cross-flow filtration: Some thoughts Desalination 1985, 53, 57
43. Lonsdale, H.; Merten, U.; Riley, R. Transport properties of cellulose acetate osmotic membranes J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1965, 9, 1341
44. Yoshioka, Y.; Jabbour, G. E. Desktop inkjet printer as a tool to print conducting polymers Synth. Met. 2006, 156, 779
45. Cui, X.; Boland, T. Human microvasculature fabrication using thermal inkjet printing technology Biomaterials 2009, 30, 6221
46. de Gans, B.; Ulrich, S.; Schubert, U. S. Inkjet Printing of Polymer Micro-Arrays and Libraries: Instrumentation, Requirements, and Perspectives Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2003, 24, 659