The circe principle explains how resource-rich land can waylay pollinators in fragmented landscapes

Current Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 15, 2011, Pages 1302-1307

  Lander, Tonya A ^a,c   Bebber, Daniel P ^b   Choy, Chris T L ^a   Harris, Stephen A ^a   Boshier, David H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b EARTHWATCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c French National Institute for Agriculture   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM; POLLINATION; THEORETICAL MODEL; TREE;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POLLINATION; TREES;

GOMORTEGA KEULE; GOMORTEGACEAE;

EID: 80051469611     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.045     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. C. Kremen, N.M. Williams, M.A. Aizen, B. Gemmill-Herren, G. LeBuhn, R. Minckley, L. Packer, S.G. Potts, T. Roulston, and I. Steffan-Dewenter Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: A conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change Ecol. Lett. 10 2007 299 314 (Pubitemid 46426872)
2. K.A. Baum, K.J. Haynes, F.P. Dillemuth, and J.T. Cronin The matrix enhances the effectiveness of corridors and stepping stones Ecology 85 2004 2671 2676 (Pubitemid 39448239)
3. F. Adriaensen, J.P. Chardon, G. De Blust, E. Swinnen, S. Villalba, H. Gulinck, and E. Matthysen The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model Landsc. Urban Plan. 64 2003 233 247 (Pubitemid 36796884)
4. T.H. Ricketts The matrix matters: Effective isolation in fragmented landscapes Am. Nat. 158 2001 87 99 (Pubitemid 32550582)
5. I. Steffan-Dewenter, U. Münzenberg, and T. Tscharntke Pollination, seed set and seed predation on a landscape scale Proc. Biol. Sci. 268 2001 1685 1690 (Pubitemid 32758605)
6. L. Tischendorf, and L. Fahrig How should we measure landscape connectivity? Landsc. Ecol. 15 2000 633 641
7. C.G. Eckert, S. Kalisz, M.A. Geber, R. Sargent, E. Elle, P.O. Cheptou, C. Goodwillie, M.O. Johnston, J.K. Kelly, and D.A. Moeller Plant mating systems in a changing world Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 25 2010 35 43
8. R. Hassan, R. Scholes, and N. Ash Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends, Volume 1, The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series 2005 Island Press Washington, DC
9. S. Lavergne, W. Thuiller, J. Molina, and M. Debussche Environmental and human factors influencing rare plant local occurrence, extinction and persistence: a 115-year study in the Mediterranean region J. Biogeogr. 32 2005 799 811 (Pubitemid 40764317)
10. R. Frankham Conservation genetics Annu. Rev. Genet. 29 1995 305 327 (Pubitemid 26005345)
11. J.C. Biesmeijer, S.P.M. Roberts, M. Reemer, R. Ohlemüller, M. Edwards, T. Peeters, A.P. Schaffers, S.G. Potts, R. Kleukers, and C.D. Thomas Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands Science 313 2006 351 354 (Pubitemid 44480959)
12. S. Oldfield, C. Lusty, and A. MacKinven The World List of Threatened Trees 1998 World Conservation Press Cambridge
13. N. Myers, R.A. Mittermeier, C.G. Mittermeier, G.A. da Fonseca, and J. Kent Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities Nature 403 2000 853 858 (Pubitemid 30130979)
14. T.A. Lander, D.H. Boshier, and S.A. Harris Fragmented but not isolated: Contribution of single trees, small patches and long-distance pollen flow to genetic connectivity for Gomortega keule, an endangered Chilean tree Biol. Conserv. 143 2010 2583 2590
15. T.A. Lander, S.A. Harris, and D.H. Boshier Flower and fruit production and insect pollination of the endangered Chilean tree Gomortega keule in native forest, exotic pine plantation and agricultural environments Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 82 2009 403 412
16. D.H. Janzen The future of tropical ecology Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17 1986 305 324
17. J. San Martin, and A. Sanchez Las Comunidades Relictas de Gomortega keule (Gomortegaceae, Magnoliopsia) en Chile Central An. Jardin Botanico Madr. 1979 57 1999 317 326
18. R Development Core Team (2010). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing) (http://www.r-project.org/).
19. G.M. White, D.H. Boshier, and W. Powell Increased pollen flow counteracts fragmentation in a tropical dry forest: An example from Swietenia humilis Zuccarini Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 2002 2038 2042 (Pubitemid 34169010)
20. B.H. McRae, and P. Beier Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 2007 19885 19890
21. Y. Richard, and D.P. Armstrong Cost distance modelling of landscape connectivity and gap-crossing ability using radio-tracking data J. Appl. Ecol. 47 2010 603 610
22. Hankin, R.K.S. (2011). Package 'ResistorArray' (http://cran.r-project. org/web/packages/ResistorArray/).
23. E.S. Jules, and P. Shahani A broader ecological context to habitat fragmentation: Why matrix habitat is more important than we thought J. Veg. Sci. 14 2003 459 464 (Pubitemid 37096361)
24. J. Vandermeer, and R. Carvajal Metapopulation dynamics and the quality of the matrix Am. Nat. 158 2001 211 220 (Pubitemid 32739510)
25. R.H. MacArthur, and E.O. Wilson The Theory of Island Biogeography 1967 Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
26. V.L. Sork, and L. Waits Contributions of landscape genetics - approaches, insights, and future potential Mol. Ecol. 19 2010 3489 3495
27. S.F. Spear, N. Balkenhol, M.J. Fortin, B.H. McRae, and K. Scribner Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: Considerations for parameterization and analysis Mol. Ecol. 19 2010 3576 3591
28. I. Hanski Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes Oikos 87 1999 209 219
29. E.J. Gustafson, and R.H. Gardner The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization Ecology 77 1996 94 107
30. A. Storfer, M.A. Murphy, S.F. Spear, R. Holderegger, and L.P. Waits Landscape genetics: Where are we now? Mol. Ecol. 19 2010 3496 3514
31. J.F. Ponge Emergent properties from organisms to ecosystems: Towards a realistic approach Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 80 2005 403 411
32. M. Loreau Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: A mechanistic model Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 1998 5632 5636 (Pubitemid 28224147)
33. J.P. Grime Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: Immediate, filter and founder effects J. Ecol. 86 1998 902 910 (Pubitemid 29014857)
34. F. Dziock Life-history data in bioindication procedures, using the example of hoverflies (Diptera, syrphidae) in the Elbe floodplain Int. Rev. Hydrobiology 91 2006 341 363 (Pubitemid 44334971)
35. S. Haenke, B. Scheid, M. Schaefer, T. Tscharntke, and C. Thies Increasing syrphid fly diversity and density in sown flower strips within simple vs. complex landscapes J. Appl. Ecol. 46 2009 1106 1114
36. R.H. MacArthur, and E.R. Pianka On the optimal use of a patchy environment Am. Nat. 100 1966 603 609
37. T.A. Lander, D.H. Boshier, and S.A. Harris Isolation and characterization of eight polymorphic microsatellite loci for the endangered, endemic Chilean tree Gomortega keule (Gomortegaceae) Mol. Ecol. Notes 7 2007 1332 1334 (Pubitemid 350059265)
38. S.T. Kalinowski, M.L. Taper, and T.C. Marshall Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment Mol. Ecol. 16 2007 1099 1106
39. M.H. Meeuwig, C.S. Guy, S.T. Kalinowski, and W.A. Fredenberg Landscape influences on genetic differentiation among bull trout populations in a stream-lake network Mol. Ecol. 19 2010 3620 3633
40. R. Rodriguez, O. Matthei, and M. Quezada Flora Arborea de Chile 1983 Universidad de Concepción Concepción, Chile
41. P.V. Hechenleitner, M.F. Gardner, P.I. Thomas, C. Echeverría, B. Escobar, P. Brownless, and C.A. Martínez Plantas Amenazadas del Centro-Sur de Chile: Distribución, Conservación y Propagación 2005 Universidad Austral de Chile y Real Jardín Botánico de Edimburgo Valdivia, Chile