Expression of myriapod pair rule gene orthologs

EvoDevo

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Janssen, Ralf ^a   Budd, Graham E ^a   Prpic, Nikola Michael ^b   Damen, Wim G M ^c  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^c FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPODA; CHILOPODA; DIPLOPODA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GLOMERIS; GLOMERIS MARGINATA; HEXAPODA; MYRIAPODA; STRIGAMIA MARITIMA;

EID: 80051468707     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20419139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2041-9139-2-5     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Pankratz MJ, Jäckle H. Blastoderm segmentation. The development of Drosophila melanogaster 1993, 467-516. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Bate M, Martinez Arias A.
2. Davis GK, Patel NH. Playing by pair rules?. BioEssays 2003, 25:425-429.
3. Nüsslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature 1980, 287:795-801.
4. Ingham PW, Baker NE, Martinez-Arias A. Regulation of segment polarity genes in the Drosophila blastoderm by fushi tarazu and even skipped. Nature 1988, 331:73-75.
5. Cadigan KM, Grossniklaus U, Gehring WJ. Localized expression of sloppy paired protein maintains the polarity of Drosophila parasegments. Genes Dev 1994, 8:899-913.
6. Sanson B. Generating patterns from fields of cells. EMBO reports 2001, 2:1083-1088.
7. Davis GK, Patel NH. Short, long, and beyond: molecular and embryological approaches to insect segmentation. Annu Rev Entomol 2002, 47:669-699.
8. Janssen R, Le Gouar M, Pechmann M, Poulin F, Bolognesi R, Schwager EE, Hopfen C, Colbourne JK, Budd GE, Brown SJ, Prpic NM, Kosiol C, Vervoort M, Damen WGM, Balavoine G, McGregor AP. Conservation, loss, and redeployment of Wnt ligands in protostomes: implications for understanding the evolution of segment formation. BMC Evol Biol 10:374.
9. Choe CP, Miller SC, Brown SJ. A pair rule gene circuit defines segments sequentially in the short-germ insect Tribolium castaneum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:6560-6564.
10. Choe CP, Brown SJ. Evolutionary flexibility of pair rule patterning revealed by functional analysis of secondary pair rule genes, paired and sloppy-paired in the short-germ insect, Tribolium castaneum. Dev Biol 2007, 302:281-94.
11. Liu PZ, Kaufman TC. even-skipped is not a pair rule gene but has segmental and gap-like functions in Oncopeltus fasciatus, an intermediate germband insect. Development 2005, 132:2081-2092.
12. Mito T, Kobayashi C, Sarashima I, Zhang H, Shinahara W, Miyawaki K, Shinmyo Y, Ohuchi, Noji S. even-skipped has gap-like, pair rule-like, and segmental functions in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus, a basal, intermediate germ insect (Orthoptera). Dev Biol 2007, 303:202-213.
13. Damen WGM, Janssen R, Prpic NM. Pair rule gene orthologs in spider segmentation. Evol Dev 2005, 7:618-628.
14. Copf T, Rabet N, Celniker SE, Averof M. Posterior patterning genes and the identification of a unique body region in the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana. Development 2003, 130:5915-5927.
15. Davis GK, D'Alessio JA, Patel NH. Pax3/7 genes reveal conservation and divergence in the arthropod segmentation hierarchy. Dev Biol 2005, 285:169-184.
16. Hughes CL, Kaufman TC. Exploring myriapod segmentation: the expression patterns of even-skipped, engrailed, and wingless in a centipede. Dev Biol 2002, 247:47-61.
17. Chipman AD, Arthur W, Akam M. A double segment periodicity underlies segment generation in centipede development. Curr Biol 2004, 14:1250-1255.
18. Chipman AD, Akam M. The segmentation cascade in the centipede Strigamia maritima: involvement of the Notch pathway and pair rule gene homologues. Dev Biol 2008, 319:160-169.
19. Janssen R, Prpic NM, Damen WGM. Gene expression suggests decoupled dorsal and ventral segmentation in the millipede Glomeris marginata (Myriapoda: Diplopoda). Dev Biol 2004, 268:89-104.
20. Janssen R, Damen WGM. The ten Hox genes of the millipede Glomeris marginata. Dev Genes Evol 2006, 216:451-465.
21. Damen WGM, Weller M, Tautz D. The expression patterns of hairy, even-skipped, and runt in the spider Cupiennius salei imply that these genes were segmentation genes in a basal arthropod. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97:4515-4519.
22. Schoppmeier M, Damen WGM. Expression of Pax group III genes suggests a single-segmental periodicity for opisthosomal segment patterning in the spider Cupiennius salei. Evol Dev 2005, 7:160-167.
23. Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Wheeler DL. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:23-27.
24. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PsiBLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25:3389-3402.
25. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25:4876-4882.
26. Strimmer K, von Haeseler A. Quartet puzzling: a quartet maximum likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol Biol Evol 1996, 13:964-969.
27. Swofford DL. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). 2002, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, Version 4.
28. Prpic NM, Tautz D. The expression of the proximodistal axis patterning genes Distal-less and dachshund in the appendages of Glomeris marginata (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) suggests a special role of these genes in patterning the head appendages. Dev Biol 2003, 260:97-112.
29. Janssen R, Budd GE, Damen WG, Prpic NM. Evidence for Wg-independent tergite boundary formation in the millipede Glomeris marginata. Dev Genes Evol 2008, 218:361-370.
30. Ogawa E, Maruyama M, Kagoshima H, Inuzuka M, Lu J, Sakate M, Shigesada K, Ito Y. PEBP2/PEA2 represents a family of transcription factors homologous to the products of the Drosophila runt gene and the human AML1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993, 90:6859-6863.
31. Aranda M, Marques-Souza H, Bayer T, Tautz D. The role of the segmentation gene hairy in Tribolium. Dev Genes Evol 2008, 218:465-477.
32. Sommer RJ, Tautz D. Involvement of an orthologue of the Drosophila pair rule gene hairy in segment formation of the short germ-band embryo of Tribolium (Coleoptera). Nature 1993, 361:448-450.
33. Eckert C, Aranda M, Wolff C, Tautz D. Separable stripe enhancer elements for the pair rule gene hairy in the beetle Tribolium. EMBO Rep 2004, 5:638-642.
34. Brown SJ, Hilgenfeld RD, Denell RE. The beetle Tribolium castaneum has a fushi tarazu homolog expressed in stripes during segmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:12922-12926.
35. Maderspacher F, Bucher G, Klingler M. Pair rule and gap gene mutants in the flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Dev Genes Evol 1998, 208:558-568.
36. Davis GK, Jaramillo CA, Patel NH. Pax Group III genes and the evolution of insect pair rule patterning. Development 2001, 128:3445-3458.
37. Dearden PK, Donly C, Grbic M. Expression of pair rule gene homologues: early patterning of the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Development 2002, 129:5461-5472.
38. Minelli A. A three-phase model of arthropod segmentation. Dev Genes Evol 2001, 211:509-521.
39. Peel A, Akam M. Evolution of segmentation: Rolling back the clock. Curr Biol 2003, 13:R708-R710.
40. Peel A. The evolution of arthropod segmentation mechanisms. BioEssays 2004, 26:1108-111.
41. Damen WGM. Arthropod segmentation: Why centipedes are odd. Curr Biol 2004, 14:R557-R559.
42. Chipman AD. Parallel evolution of segmentation by co-option of ancestral gene regulatory networks. BioEssays 2010, 32:60-70.
43. Harding K, Rushlow C, Doyle HJ, Hoey T, Levine M. Cross-regulatory interactions among pair rule genes in Drosophila. Science 1986, 233:953-959.
44. Howard K, Ingham P. Regulatory interactions between the segmentation genes fushi tarazu, hairy, and engrailed in the Drosophila blastoderm. Cell 1986, 44:949-957.
45. Gutjahr T, Frei E, Noll M. Complex regulation of early paired expression: initial activation by gap genes and pattern modulation by pair rule genes. Development 1993, 117:609-623.
46. Fujioka M, Jaynes JB, Goto T. Early even-skipped stripes act as morphogenetic gradients at the single cell level to establish engrailed expression. Development 1995, 121:4371-4382.
47. Schroeder MD, Pearce M, Fak J, Fan H, Unnerstall U, Emberly E, Rajewsky N, Siggia ED, Gaul U. Transcriptional control in the segmentation gene network of Drosophila. PLoS Biol 2004, 2:E271.
48. Hidalgo A. Interactions between segment polarity genes and the generation of the segmental pattern in Drosophila. Mech Dev 1991, 35:77-87.
49. Oppenheimer DI, MacNicol AM, Patel NH. Functional conservation of the wingless-engrailed interaction as shown by a widely applicable baculovirus misexpression system. Curr Biol 1999, 9:1288-1296.
50. Damen WG. Parasegmental organization of the spider embryo implies that the parasegment is an evolutionary conserved entity in arthropod embryogenesis. Development 2002, 129:1239-1250.
51. Prpic NM. Parasegmental appendage allocation in annelids and arthropods and the homology of parapodia and arthropodia. Front Zool 2008, 5:17.
52. Benedyk MJ, Mullen JR, DiNardo S. odd-paired: a zinc finger pair rule protein required for the timely activation of engrailed and wingless in Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev 1994, 8:105-117.
53. Pourquie O. Notch around the clock. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1999, 9:599-565.
54. Pourquie O. The segmentation clock: converting embryonic time into spatial pattern. Science 2003, 301:328-330.
55. Stollewerk A, Schoppmeier M, Damen WGM. Involvement of Notch and Delta genes in spider segmentation. Nature 2003, 423:863-865.
56. Pueyo JI, Lanfear R, Couso JP. Ancestral Notch-mediated segmentation revealed in the cockroach Periplaneta americana. PNAS 2008, 105:16614-16619.
57. McGregor AP, Pechmann M, Schwager EE, Feitosa NM, Kruck S, Aranda M, Damen WG. Wnt8 is required for growth-zone establishment and development of opisthosomal segments in a spider. Curr Biol 2008, 18:1619-1623.
58. McGregor AP, Pechmann M, Schwager EE, Damen WG. An ancestral regulatory network for posterior development in arthropods. Commun Integr Biol 2009, 2:174-176.
59. Murat S, Hopfen C, McGregor AP. The function and evolution of Wnt genes in arthropods. Arthropod Struct Dev 2010, 39:446-452.
60. Lekven AC, Thorpe CJ, Waxman JS, Moon RT. Zebrafish wnt8 encodes two wnt8 proteins on a bicistronic transcript and is required for mesoderm and neuroectoderm patterning. Dev Cell 2001, 1:103-114.
61. Li HY, Bourdelas A, Carron C, Gomez C, Boucaut JC, Shi DL. FGF8, Wnt8 and Myf5 are target genes of Tbx6 during anteroposterior specification in Xenopus embryo. Dev Biol 2006, 290:470-481.
62. Takke C, Campos-Ortega JA. her1, a zebrafish pair rule like gene, acts downstream of notch signalling to control somite development. Development 1999, 126:3005-3014.
63. Sieger D, Tautz D, Gajewski M. her11 is involved in the somitogenesis clock in zebrafish. Dev Genes Evol 2004, 214:393-406.
64. Schoppmeier M, Damen WGM. Suppressor of Hairless and Presenilin phenotypes imply involvement of canonical Notch-signalling in segmentation of the spider Cupiennius salei. Dev Biol 2005, 280:211-224.
65. Rauskolb C, Irvine KD. Notch-mediated segmentation and growth control of the Drosophila leg. Dev Biol 1999, 210:339-350.
66. Dove H, Stollewerk A. Comparative analysis of neurogenesis in the myriapod Glomeris marginata (Diplopoda) suggests more similarities to chelicerates than to insects. Development 2003, 130:2161-2171.
67. Kadner D, Stollewerk A. Neurogenesis in the chilopod Lithobius forficatus suggests more similarities to chelicerates than to insects. Dev Genes Evol 2004, 214:367-379.
68. Damen WGM. Evolutionary conservation and divergence of the segmentation process in arthropods. Dev Dyn 2007, 236:1379-1391.
69. Anderson D. Embryology and Phylogeny in Annelids and Arthropods 1973, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
70. Choe CP, Brown SJ. Genetic regulation of engrailed and wingless in Tribolium segmentation and the evolution of pair-rule segmentation. Dev Biol 2009, 325:482-491.
71. Hughes CL, Kaufman TC. Hox genes and the evolution of the arthropod body plan. Evol Dev 2002, 4:459-499.
72. Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DO, Pang K, Browne WE, Smith SA, Seaver E, Rouse GW, Obst M, Edgecombe GD, Sörensen MV, Haddock SHD, Schmidt-Rhaesa A, Okusu A, Kristensen RM, Wheeler WC, Martindale MQ, Giribet G. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 2008, 452:745-749.
73. Telford MJ, Budd GE. The place of phylogeny and cladistics in Evo-Devo research. Int J Dev Biol 2003, 47:479-490.
74. Budd GE, Telford MJ. The origin and evolution of arthropods. Nature 2009, 457:812-817.
75. Rota-Stabelli O, Campbell L, Brinkmann H, Edgecombe GD, Longhorn SJ, Peterson KJ, Pisani D, Phillipe H, Telford MJ. A congruent solution to arthropod phylogeny: phylogenomics, microRNAs and morphology support monophyletic Mandibulata. Proc Biol Sci 2011, 278:298-306.