Literacy in the Curriculum: Integrating Text Structure and Content Area Instruction

Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 199-219

  Williams, Joanna P ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961216099     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Allington, R., Guice, S., Michelson, N., Baker, K., and Li, S. (1996).Literature-based curricula in high poverty schools. In M. F. Graves, P. van den Broek, and B. M. Taylor (Eds.), The first R: Every child’s right to read New York: Teachers College Press.
2. Al Otaiba, S., and Fuchs, D. (2002).Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention. Remedial and Special Education 23 300-316.
3. Armbuster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., and Ostertag, J. (1987).Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text? Reading Research Quarterly 22 331-346.
4. Bernhardt, E., Destino, T., Kamil, M., and Rodriguez-Muñoz, M. (1995).Assessing science knowledge in an English/Spanish bilingual elementary school. Cognosos 4 4-6.
5. Bos, C. S., and Anders, P. L. (1990).Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly 12 31-42.
6. Carey, S. (1990). Cognitive development. In D. N. Osherson and E. E. Smith (Eds.), Thinking:An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 3, pp. 147-172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., and Baldwin, L. E. (1990).The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Chambliss, M. J., and Calfee, R. C. (1998).Textbooks for learning Malden, MA: Blackwell.
9. Dickson, S. (1999).Integrating reading and writing to teach compare-contrast text structure:A research-based methodology. Reading and Writing Quarterly 14 49-79.
10. Dickson, S. V., Simmons, D. C., and Kameenui, E. J. (1998).Text organization: Research bases. In D. C. Simmons and E. J. Kameenui (Eds.), What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs 239-277 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
11. Dreher, M. J., and Baker, L. (2005June)Balancing learning to read and reading for learning:Infusing information books into primary-grade classrooms Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
12. Duke, N. K. (2000).3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly 35 202-224.
13. Duke, N. K., and Kays, J. (1998).“Can I say ‘once upon a time?'" Kindergarten children developing knowledge of information book language. Early Language Research Quarterly 13 295-318.
14. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C. L., Owen, R., and Schroeder, K. (2003).Enhancing third-grade students’ mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology 95 306-315.
15. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Hamlett, C. L., Finelli, R., and Courey, S. J. (2004).Enhancing mathematical problem-solving among third-grade students with schemabased instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 96 635-647.
16. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., and Baker, S. (2001).Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research 71 279-230.
17. Harris, K. R., and Graham, S. (1999).Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development. Learning Disability Quarterly 22 251-262.
18. Hoffman, J. V., McCarthy, S. J., Abbott, J., Christian, C., Corman, L., Curry, C., et al. (1994).So what’s new in the new basals? A focus on first grade. Journal of Reading Behavior 26 47-73.
19. Jitendra, A. K., Hoppes, M. K., and Xin, Y. P. (2000).Enhancing main idea comprehension for students with learning problems: The role of summarization strategy and selfmonitoring instruction. Journal of Special Education 34 127-139.
20. Krashen, S. (1976).Formal and informal linguistic environments in language acquisition and language learning. TESOL Quarterly 10 157-168.
21. Kucan, L., and Beck, I. L., (1997).Thinking aloud and reading comprehension research:Inquiry, instruction, and social interaction. Review of Educational Research 67 271-299.
22. Lyon, G. R., Fletcher, J., Fuchs, L. and Chhabra, V. (in press).Treatment of learning disabilities In E
23. Mandler, J. M., and Johnson, N. S. (1977).Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology 9 111-151.
24. Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., and Bluth, G. J. (1980).Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly 16 72-103.
25. Meyer, B. J. F, and Poon, L. W. (2001).Effects of the structure strategy and signaling on recall of the text. Journal of Educational Psychology 93 141-159.
26. Palincsar, A. S., and Brown, A. L. (1984).Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1 117-175.
27. Pappas, C. C. (1993).Is narrative “primary”? Some insights from kindergarteners’ pretend reading of stories and information books. Journal of Reading Behavior 25 97-129.
28. Pearson, P. D., and Dole, J. A. (1987).Explicit comprehension instruction: A review of research and a new conceptualization of instruction. Elementary School Journal 88 151-165.
29. Pressley, M., and McCormick, C. (1995).Advanced educational psychology New York:Harcourt Brace.
30. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding. Santa Monica, CA:RAND.
31. Richgels, D. J., McGee, L. M., Lomax, R. G., and Sheard, C. (1987).Awareness of four text structures: Effects on recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly 22 177-196.
32. Salomon, G., and Perkins, D. N. (1989).Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist 24 113-142.
33. Smolkin, L. B., and Donovan, C. A. (2001).The contexts of comprehension: The information book read aloud, comprehension acquisition and comprehension instruction in a firstgrade classroom. Elementary School Journal 102 97-129.
34. Smolkin, L. B., and Donovan, C. A. (2003).Supporting comprehension acquisition for emerging and struggling readers: The interactive information book read-aloud. Exceptionality 11 25-38.
35. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., and Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36. Stanovich, K. E. (1986).Cognitive processes and the reading problems of learning-disabled children: Evaluating the assumption of specificity. In J. K. Torgesen and B. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on LD 87-131 Orlando, FL:Academic
37. Torgesen, J. (1977).The role of nonspecific factors in the test performance of learning disabled children: A theoretical assessment. Journal of Learning Disabilities 10 33-39.
38. Wilder, A. A., and Williams, J. P. (2001).Students with severe learning disabilities can learn higher order comprehension skills. Journal of Educational Psychology 93 268-278.
39. Williams, J. P. (1998).Improving the comprehension of disabled readers. Annals of Dyslexia 48 213-238.
40. Williams, J. P. (2003).Teaching text structure to improve reading comprehension. In H. L. Swanson, K. Harris, and S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities 295-305 New York: Guilford
41. Williams, J. P. (2006).Teaching reading comprehension in the context of elementary science instruction Manuscript in preparation.
42. Williams, J. P., Brown, L. G., Silverstein, A. K., and de Cani, J. S. (1994).An instructional program for adolescents with learning disabilities in the comprehension of narrative themes. Learning Disabilities Quarterly 17 205-221.
43. Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., and Lauer, K. D. (2004).Building the basics of comprehension instruction: Teaching expository text to young at-risk learners. Exceptionality 12 129-144.
44. Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., Lauer, K. D., Stafford, K. B., DeSisto, L. A., and de Cani, J. S. (2005).Expository text comprehension in the primary grade classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology 97 538-550.
45. Williams, J. P., Lauer, K. D., Hall, K. M., Lord, K. M., Gugga, S. S., Bak, S. J., et al. (2002).Teaching elementary school students to identify story themes. Journal of Educational Psychology 94 235-248.
46. Williams, J. P., Nubla-Kung, A. M., Pollini, S., Stafford, K. B., Garcia, A., and Snyder, A. E. (in press).Teaching cause/effect text structure through social studies content to atrisk second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities
47. Williams, J. P., Stafford, K. B., Lauer, K. D., Hall, K. M., and Pollini, S. (2006).Embedding reading comprehension training into content-area instruction Manuscript submitted for publication.