Animal visual perception

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 106-116

  Mascalzoni, Elena ^a   Regolin, Lucia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961215999     PISSN: 19395078     EISSN: 19395086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcs.97     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. von Uexküll J. A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: a picture book of invisible worlds. In: Schiller C, ed. Instinctive Behavior: The Development of a Modern Concept. New York: International Universities Press; 1934.
2. Darwin C. On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray; 1854.
3. Lamb TD, Collin SP, Pugh EN Jr. Evolution of the vertebrate eye: opsins, photoreceptors, retina and eye cup. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007, 8:960-976.
4. Nilsson DE. Eye evolution: a question of genetic promiscuity. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2007, 14:407-414.
5. Land MF. The optical structures of animal eyes. Curr Biol 2005, 15:R319-R323.
6. Jacobs GH. Primate photopigments and primate colour vision. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:577-581.
7. Osorio D, Vorobyev M. A review of the evolution of animal colour vision and visual communication signals. Vision Res 2008, 48:2042-2051.
8. Briscoe AD. Reconstructing the ancestral butterfly eye: focus on the opsins. J Exp Biol 2008, 211:1805-1813.
9. Bowmaker JK. Visual pigments of fishes. In: Douglas RH, Djamgoz MBA, eds. The Visual System of Fish. London New York Tokyo Melbourne Madras: Chapman and Hall; 1990, 81-107.
10. Neumeyer C. Tetrachromatic colour vision in goldfish: evidence from colour mixture experiments. J Comp Physiol A 1992, 171:639-649.
11. Bowmaker JK, Thorpe A, Douglas RH. Ultraviolet-sensitive cones in the goldfish. Vis Res 1991, 31:349-352.
12. Hart NS, Vorobyev M. Modelling oil droplet absorption spectra and spectral sensitivities of bird cone photoreceptors. J Comp Physiol A 2005, 191:381-392.
13. Martin GR, Osorio D. Vision in birds. In: Masland RH, Albright TD, eds. The Senses, vol. 1. London: Academic Press; 2008, 25-52.
14. Jacobs GH. Comparative Colour Vision. London: Academic Press; 1981.
15. De Valois RL, Morgan HC, Polson MC, Hull EM. Psychophysical studies of monkey vision. I. Macaque luminosity and colour vision tests. Vis Res 1974, 14:53-67.
16. Jacobs GH, Neitz J. Inheritance of colour vision in a New World monkey (Saimiri sciureus). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987, 84:2545-2549.
17. Varela FJ, Palacios A, Goldsmith TH. Color vision of birds. In: Bischof HJ, Zeigler HP, eds. Avian Vision and Cognition. Cambridge: The MIT press; 1993.
18. Arikawa K, Wakakuwa M, Qiu X, Kurasawa M, Stavenga DG. Sexual dimorphism of short-wavelength photoreceptors in the small white butterfly, Pieris rapae crucivora. J Neurosci 2005, 25:5935-5942.
19. Matsuno T, Fujita K. A comparative psychophysical approach to visual perception in primates. Primates 2009, 50:121-130.
20. Kanizsa G. Organization in Vision. Essays on Gestalt Perception. New York: Praeger; 1979.
21. Tinbergen N. The Study of Instinct. New York: Oxford University Press; 1951.
22. Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD. Mimicry and the eye of the beholder. Proc R Soc Lond B 1993, 253:203-204.
23. Hertz M. Wahrnehmungpsychologische Untersuchungen am Eichelhäher. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Psychologie 1928, 7:144-194.
24. Tinbergen N. Über die Orientierung des Bienenwolfes Philanthus triangulum Fabricius. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Physiologie 1932, 16:305-335.
25. Michotte A, Thinès G, Crabbé G. Les compléments amodaux des structures perceptive. Louvain: Studia Psychologica, Publications Universitaires; 1964.
26. Vallortigara G. Visual cognition and representation in birds and primates. In: Rogers LJ, Kaplan G, eds. Vertebrate Comparative Cognition: Are Primates Superior to Non-Primates? New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2004, 57-94.
27. Kanizsa G, Renzi P, Conte S, Compostela C, Guerani L. Amodal completion in mouse vision. Perception 1993, 22:713-721.
28. Sato A, Kanazawa S, Fujita K. Perception of object unity in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Jpn Psychol Res 1997, 39:191-199.
29. Fujita K. Perceptual completion in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and pigeons (Columba livia). Percept Psychophys 2001, 63:115-125.
30. Fujita K, Giersch A. What perceptual rules do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) follow in completing partly occluded figures? J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Process 2005, 31:387-398.
31. Deruelle C, Barbet I, Dèpy D, Fagot J. Perception of partly occluded figures by baboons (Papio papio). Perception 2000, 9:1483-1497.
32. Fagot J, Barbet I, Parron C, Deruelle C. Amodal completion by baboons (Papio papio): contribution of background depth cues. Primates 2006, 47:145-150.
33. Regolin L, Vallortigara G. Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks. Percept Psychophys 1995, 57:971-976.
34. Sovrano VA, Bisazza A. Recognition of partly occluded objects by fish. Anim Cogn 2007, 11:161-166.
35. Cerella J. The pigeon's analysis of pictures. Pattern Recognit 1980, 12:1-6.
36. Sekuler AB, Lee JAJ, Shettleworth SJ. Pigeons do not complete partly occluded figures. Perception 1996, 25:1109-1120.
37. Nieder A, Wagner H. Perception and neuronal coding of subjective contours in the owl. Nat Neurosci 1999, 2:660-663.
38. Lea SEG, Slater AM, Ryan CME. Perception of object unity in chicks: a comparison with the human infant. Infant Behav Dev 1996, 19:501-504.
39. Di Pietro NT, Wasserman EA, Young ME. Effects of occlusion on pigeons' visual object recognition. Perception 2002, 31:1299-1312.
40. Cutting JE, Vishton PM. Perceiving layout and knowing distances: the integration relative potency and contextual use of different information about depth. In: Epstein W, Rogers S, eds. Handbook of Perception and Cognition: Perception of Space and Motion. San Diego: Academic; 1995, 69-117.
41. Forkman B, Vallortigara G. Minimization of modal contours. An essential cross-species strategy in disambiguating relative depth. Anim Cogn 1999, 4:181-185.
42. Gunderson VM, Yonas A, Sargent PL, Grant-Webster KS. Infant macaque monkeys respond to pictorial depth. Psychol Sci 1993, 4:93-98.
43. Yonas A, Cleaves W, Pettersen L. Development of sensitivity to pictorial depth. Science 1978, 200:77-79.
44. Timney B, Keil K. Horses are sensitive to pictorial depth cues. Perception 1996, 25:1121-1128.
45. Forkman B. Hens use occlusion to judge depth in a two-dimensional picture. Perception 1998, 27:861-867.
46. Cavoto BR, Cook RG. The contribution of monocular depth cues to scene perception by pigeons. Psychol Sci 2006, 17:628-634.
47. Reichardt W. Movement perception in insects. In: Reichardt W, ed. Processing of Optical Data by Organisms and Machines. New York: Academic; 1969, 465-493.
48. Wallace GK. Visual scanning in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria Forskal. J Exp Biol 1959, 36:512-525.
49. Sobel EC. The locust's use of motion parallax to measure distance. J Comp Physiol A 1990, 167:579-588.
50. Kral K, Poteser M. Motion parallax as a source of distance information in locusts and mantids. J Insect Behav 1997, 10:145-163.
51. Srinivasan MV, Lehrer M, Horridge GA. Visual figure-ground discrimination in the honeybee: the role of motion parallax at boundaries. Proc R Soc Lond B 1990, 238:331-350.
52. Srinivasan MV, Lehrer M, Kirchner WH, Zhang SW. Range perception through apparent image speed in freely flying honeybees. Vis Neurosci 1991, 6:519-535.
53. Srinivasan MV, Pinter RB, Osorio D. Matched filtering in the visual system of the fly: large monopolar cells in the lamina are optimized to detect moving edges and blobs. Proc R Soc Lond B 1990, 240:279-293.
54. Emmerton J. The pigeon's discrimination of movement patterns (Lissajous figures) and contour-dependent rotational invariance. Perception 1986, 15:573-588.
55. Dittrich WH, Lea SEG. Motion as a natural category for pigeons: generalization and a feature-positive effect. J Exp Anal Behav 1993, 59:115-129.
56. Hodos W, Smith L, Bonbright JC Jr. Detection of the velocity of movement of visual stimuli by pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav 1975, 25:143-156.
57. Siegel RK. Apparent movement detection in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav 1970, 14:93-97.
58. Siegel RK. Apparent movement and real movement detection in pigeons: stimulus generalization. J Exp Anal Behav 1971, 16:189-192.
59. Mascalzoni E, Regolin L, Vallortigara G. Mom's shadow: structure-from-motion in newly hatched chicks as revealed by an imprinting procedure. Anim Cogn 2009, 12:389-400.
60. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept Psychophys 1973, 14:201-211.
61. Blake R. Cats perceive biological motion. Psychol Sci 1993, 4:54-57.
62. Omori E, Watanabe S. Discrimination of Johansson's stimuli in pigeons. Int J Comp Psychol 1996, 9:92.
63. Dittrich WH, Lea SEG, Barrett J, Gurr PR. Categorisation of natural movements by pigeons: visual concept discrimination and biological motion. J Exp Anal Behav 1998, 70:281-299.
64. Siegel RM, Andersen RA. Perception of three-dimensional structure from motion in monkey and man. Nature 1988, 331:259-261.
65. Tomonaga M. Visual search for biological motion patterns in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Psychologia 2001, 44:46-59.
66. Regolin L, Tommasi L, Vallortigara G. Visual perception of biological motion in newly hatched chicks as revealed by an imprinting procedure. Anim Cogn 2000, 3:53-60.
67. Herman LM, Morel-Samuels P, Pack AA. Bottlenosed dolphin and human recognition of veridical and degraded video displays of an artificial gestural language. J Exp Psychol: Gen 1990, 119:215-230.
68. Nakamura N, Fujita K, Ushitani T, Miyatat H. Perception of the standard and the reversed Müller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 2006, 120:252-261.
69. Suganuma E, Pessoa VF, Monge-Fuentes V, Castro BM, Tavares MCE. Perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Behav Brain Res 2007, 182:67-72.
70. Pepperberg IM, Vicinay J, Cavanagh P. Processing of the Müller-Lyer illusion by a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Perception 2008, 37:765-781.
71. Barbet I, Fagot J. Perception of the corridor illusion by baboons (Papio papio). Behav Brain Res 2002, 132:111-115.
72. Imura T, Tomonaga M, Yagi A. The effects of linear perspective on relative size discrimination in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens). Behav Processes 2008, 77:306-312.
73. Fujita K, Blough DS, Blough PM. Pigeons see the Ponzo illusion. Anim Learn Behav 1991, 19:283-293.
74. Fujita K. Perception of the Ponzo illusion by rhesus monkeys, chimpanzees, and humans: similarity and difference in the three primate species. Percept Psychophys 1997, 59:284-292.
75. Nieder A. Seeing more than meets the eye: processing of illusory contours in animals. J Comp Physiol A 2002, 188:249-260.
76. Zanforlin M. Visual perception of complex forms (anomalous surfaces) in chicks. Ital J Psychol 1981, 1:1-16.
77. Bravo M, Blake R, Morrison S. Cats see subjective contours. Vision Res 1988, 28:861-865.
78. De Weerd P, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG. Cue-dependent deficits in grating orientation discrimination after V4 lesions in macaques. Vis Neurosci 1996, 13:529-538.
79. Sovrano VA, Bisazza A. Perception of subjective contours in fish. Perception 2009, 38:579-590.
80. van Hateren JH, Srinivasan M, Wait PB. Pattern recognition in bees: orientation discrimination. J Comp Physiol A 1990, 167:649-654.
81. Clara E, Regolin L, Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M. Domestic chicks perceive stereokinetic illusions. Perception 2006, 35:983-992.
82. Clara E, Regolin L, Vallortigara G, Rogers L. Perception of the stereokinetic illusion by the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Anim Cogn 2007, 10:135-140.
83. Kellman PJ, Spelke E-S. Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy. Cognit Psychol 1983, 15:483-524.
84. Slater A, Morison V, Somers M, Mattock A, Brown E, Taylor D. Newborn and older infants' perception of partly occluded objects. Infant Behav Dev 1990, 13:33-49.
85. Valenza E, Leo I, Gava L, Simion F. Perceptual completion in newborn human infants. Child Dev 2006, 77:1810-1821.
86. Vallortigara G, Regolin L. Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks. Curr Biol 2006, 16:279-280.
87. Simion F, Regolin L, Bulf H. A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:809-813.