Perception of the stereokinetic illusion by the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus)

Animal Cognition

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 135-140

  Clara, Elena ^a,b   Regolin, Lucia ^b   Vallortigara, Giorgio ^c   Rogers, Lesley ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Common marmosets; Stereokinetic illusion; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; MALE; MARMOSET; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CALLITHRIX; FEMALE; MALE; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

CALLITHRIX JACCHUS; MAMMALIA; MARMOSETS; PRIMATES;

EID: 33947515718     PISSN: 14359448     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-006-0046-3     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barbet I, Fagot J (2002) Perception of the corridor illusion by baboons (Papio papio). Behav Brain Res 132:111-115
2. Bayne KAL, Davis RT (1983) Susceptibility of rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) to the Ponzo Illusion. Bull Psychonom Soc 21:476-478
3. Bressan P, Vallortigara G (1987) Learning to see stereokinetic effects. Perception 16:187-192
4. Clara E, Regolin L, Vallortigara G, Zanforlin M (2006) Domestic chicks perceive stereokinetic illusions. Perception 35:983-992
5. Deruelle C, Barbet I, Depsy D, Fagot J (2000) Perception of partly occluded figures by baboons (Papio papio). Perception 29:1483-1497
6. Dittrich WH, Lea SEG (1993) Motion as a natural category for pigeons: generalization and a feature-positive effect. J Exp Anal Behav 59:115-129
7. Emmerton J (1986) The pigeon's discrimination of movement patterns (Lissajous figures) and contour-dependent rotational invariance. Perception 15:573-588
8. Fujita K, Blough DS, Blough PM (1991) Pigeons see the Ponzo illusion. Anim Learn Behav 19:283-293
9. Kaplan G, Rogers LJ (1999) Parental care in marmosets (Callithrix jacchus jacchus): development and effect of anogenital licking on exploration. J Comp Psychol 113:269-276
10. Menzel CR (1980) Head cocking and visual perception in primates. Anim Behav 28:151-159
11. Musatti CL (1924) Sui fenomeni stereocinetici. Arch Ital Psicol 3:105-120
12. Musatti CL (1975) Stereokinetic phenomena and their interpretation. In: Flores D'Arcais GB (ed) Studies in perception. Festschrift for Fabio Metalli. Martello-Giunti, Milan, pp 166-189
13. Nagasaka Y, Hori K, Osada Y (2005) Perceptual grouping in pigeons. Perception 34:625-632
14. Nieder A (2002) Seeing more than meets the eye: processing of illusory contours in animals. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 188:249-260
15. Perrett DI, Harries MH, Benson PJ, Chitty AJ, Mistlin AJ (1990) Retrieval of structure from rigid and biological motion: an analysis of the visual responses of neurones in the macaque temporal cortex. In: Blake A, Troscianko T (eds) I and the eye. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 181-201
16. Regolin L, Vallortigara G (1995) Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks. Percept Psychophys 57:971-976
17. Rokers B, Fang F, Pan H, Bly BM, Liu Z (2001) The time course in perceptual organization: an EEG study. Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL
18. Siegel RM, Andersen RA (1988) Perception of three-dimensional structure from visual motion in monkey and man. Nature 331:259-261
19. Timney B, Keil K (1996) Horses are sensitive to pictorial depth cues. Perception 25: 1121-1128
20. Ullman S (1979) The interpretation of visual motion. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
21. Ullman S (1984) Maximizing rigidity: the incremental recovery of 3- D structure from rigid and rubbery motion. Perception 13:255-274
22. Vallortigara G, Bressan P, Bertamini M (1988) Perceptual alternations in stereokinesis. Perception 17:31-34
23. Vallortigara G, Bressan P, Zanforlin M (1986) The Saturn illusion: A new stereokinetic effect. Vision Res 26:811-813
24. Wallach H, O'Connell DN (1953) The kinetic depth effect. J Exp Psychol 45(4):205-217
25. Wilson JA, Robinson JO, Piggins DJ (1983)Wobble cones and wobble holes: the stereokinetic effect revisited. Perception 12(2):187-193
26. Zanforlin M (1987) La determinazione teorica del cono stereocinetico di Musatti. Att. Mem. Accad. Patav. SSLLAA 99:33-46
27. Zanforlin M (1988) The height of a stereokinetic cone: a quantitative determination of a 3-D effect from 2-D moving patterns without a "rigidity assumption". Psychol Res 50:62-172
28. Zanforlin M, Vallortigara G (1988) Depth effect from a rotating line of constant length. Percept Psychophys 44:493-499
29. Zivotofsky AZ, Golberg ME, Powell KD (2005) Rhesus monkey behave as if they perceive the Duncker illusion. J Cogn Neurosci 17(7):1011-1017