Amodal completion by baboons (Papio papio): Contribution of background depth cues

Primates

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 145-150

  Fagot, Joël ^a   Barbet, Isabelle ^a   Parron, Carole ^a   Deruelle, Christine ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Amodal completion; Baboon; Depth perception

Indexed keywords

PERCEPTION; PRIMATE; VISION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; MALE; PAPIO PAPIO; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; MALE; PAPIO PAPIO; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

PAPIO; PAPIO HAMADRYAS; PAPIO PAPIO;

EID: 33645354066     PISSN: 00328332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10329-005-0165-5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barbet I, Fagot J (2002) Perception of the corridor illusion by baboons (Papio papio). Behav Brain Res 132:111-115
2. Barbet I, Fagot J (2005) Control of the corridor illusion in baboons (Papio papio) by gradient and linear perspective depth cues. Perception (in press)
3. Benson C, Yonas A (1973) Development of sensitivity to static pictorial depth information. Percept Psychophys 13:361-366
4. Bruno N, Bertamini M, Domini F (1997) Amodal completion of partly occluded surfaces: Is there a mosaic stage? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:1412-1426
5. Cutting JE, Vishton PM (1995) Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration relative potency and contextual use of different information about depth. In: Epstein W, Rogers S (eds) Handbook of perception and cognition: Perception of space and motion. Academic, San Diego, pp 69-117
6. Deruelle C, Barbet I, Dépy D, Fagot J (2000) Perception of partly occluded figures by baboons (Papio papio). Perception 29:1483-1497
7. Forkman B (1998) Hens use occlusion to judge depth in a two-dimensional picture. Perception 27:861-867
8. Forkman B, Vallortigara G (1999) Minimization of modal contours: An essential cross-species strategy in disambiguating relative depth. Anim Cogn 2:181-185
9. Fujita K (2000) What you see is different from what I see. Species differences in visual perception. In: Matsuzawa T (eds) Primate origin of human cognition and behavior. Tokyo, pp 28-54
10. Fujita K (2001) Perceptual completion in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and pigeons (Columbia livia). Percept Psychophys 63:115-125
11. Kanizsa G (1979) Organization in vision: Essays on gestalt perception. Praeger, NewYork
12. Kanizsa G, Renzi P, Conte S, Compostela C, Guerani L (1993) Amodal completion in mouse vision. Perception 22:713-721
13. Lea SEG, Slater AM, Ryan CME (1996) Perception of object unity in chicks: A comparison with the human infant. Infant Behav dev 19:501-504
14. Michotte A (1963) The perception of causality. Basic Books, NewYork
15. Palmer SE (1999) Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. MIT, Cambridge
16. Pratt F (1979) The contribution of colour to three-dimensional ambiguities in paintings and drawings. Perception 8:157-173
17. Regolin L, Vallortigara G (1995) Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks. Percept Psychophys 57:971-976
18. Rubin N (2001) The role of junctions in surface completion and contour matching. Perception 30:339-366
19. Sato A, Kanazawa S, Fujita K (1997) Perception of object unity in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Jpn Psychol Res 39:191-199
20. Sekuler AB, Lee JAJ, Shettleworth SJ (1996) Pigeons do not complete partly occluded figures. Perception 25:1109-1120
21. Solso RL (1994) Cognition and the visual arts. MIT, Cambridge
22. Sugita Y (1999) Grouping of image fragments in primary visual cortex. Nature 401:269-272
23. Watanabe S, Furuya I (1997) Usage of the video display for study of visual cognition in pigeons. Int J Comp Psychol 10:111-127
24. Wasserman EA, DiPietro NT, Young ME (2001) The effects of occlusion on pigeons' object recognition. Paper presented at the meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, Fla.