Clinical and hemodynamic outcomes after aortic valve replacement with stented and stentless pericardial xenografts: A propensity-matched analysis

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 319-325

  D'Onofrio, Augusto ^a   Cresce, Giovanni Domenico ^a   Bolgan, Irene ^a   Magagna, Paolo ^a   Piccin, Caterina ^a   Auriemma, Stefano ^a   Fabbri, Alessandro ^a  

^a SAN BORTOLO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERICARBON FREEDOM STENTLESS BIOPROSTHESIS; PERIMOUNT MAGNA STENTED VALVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHETIC VALVE ENDOCARDITIS; REOPERATION; SURGICAL MORTALITY; THROMBOEMBOLISM; AORTA VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; ITALY; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERICARDIUM; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROSTHESIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; ITALY; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PERICARDIUM; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79961211703     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Dunning J, Graham RJ, Thambyrajah J, Stewart MJ, Kendall SWH, Hunter S. Stentless vs. stented aortic valve bioprostheses: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur Heart J 2007;28:2369-2374
2. Borger MA, Carson SM, Ivanov J, et al. Stentless aortic valves are hemodynamically superior to stented valves during mid-term follow-up: A large retrospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:2180-2185
3. Kunadian B, Kunadian V, Thornley AR, et al. Meta-analysis of valve hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression for stentless versus stented aortic valves. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:73-78
4. Ali A, Halstead JC, Cafferty F, et al. Early clinical and hemodynamic outcomes after stented and stentless aortic valve replacement: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:2162-2168
5. Ali A, Halstead JC, Cafferty F, et al. Are stentless valves superior to modern stented valves? A prospective randomized trial. Circulation 2006;114:I535-I540
6. Yankah CA, Shubel J, Buz S, Siniawski H, Hetzer R. Seventeen year clinical results of 1037 Mitroflow pericardial heart valve prostheses in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis 2005;14:172-179
7. Gao G, Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL, Furnalry AP, Starr A. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:384-388
8. D'Onofrio A, Auriemma S, Magagna P, et al. Aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless prosthesis: 7 years' experience in 130 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:491-495
9. Akins CW, Miller DC, Turina MI, et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:732-738
10. Austin PC. Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: A systematic review and suggestions for improvement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:1128-1135
11. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P, and the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative workgroup. Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: The second international consensus conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative workgroup (ADQI). Crit Care 2004;8:R204-R212
12. Gallo I, Nistal F, Revuelta JM, Garcia Statue E, Artinano E, Duran CG. Incidence of primary tissue valve failure with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valve. Preliminary results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;90:278-280
13. Wheatley DJ, Fisher J, Reece IJ, Spyt T, Breeze P. Primary tissue failure in pericardial heart valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987;94:367-374
14. Pellerin M, Mihaileanu S, Couetil JP, et al. Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position: Long-term follow-up 1980 to 1994. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66(Suppl.):S57-S61
15. David TE, Pollick C, Bos J. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:113-118
16. Perez de Arenaza D, Lees B, Flather M, et al. Randomized comparison of stentless versus stented valves for aortic stenosis. Effect on left ventricular mass. Circulation 2005;112:2696-2702
17. Luciani GB, Casali G, Auriemma S, Santini F, Mazzucco A. Survival after stentless and stented xenograft aortic valve replacement: A concurrent controlled trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1443-1449
18. Bakhtiary F, Schiemann M, Dzemali O, et al. Stentless bioprostheses improve coronary flow more than stented prostheses after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:883-888
19. Nagy ZL, Bodi A, Len A, Balogh I, Peterffy A. Three years' experience with the Sorin Pericarbon stentless prosthesis: Mid-term results with three different implantation techniques. J Heart Valve Dis 2005;14:72-77
20. Beholz S, Dusche S, Konertz W. Continuous suture technique for freedom stentless valve: Reduced crossclamp time. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2006;14:128-133
21. Dalmau MJ, MariaGonzales-Santos J, Lopez-Rodriguez J, Bueno M, Arribas A. The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna aortic xenograft: A new design with an improved hemodynamic performance. Interactive Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2006;5:263-267
22. Clavel MA, Webb JG, Pibarot P, et al. Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:1883-1891