Survival after stentless and stented xenograft aortic valve replacement: A concurrent, controlled trial

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 74, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 1443-1449

  Luciani, Giovanni Battista ^a   Casali, Gianluca ^a   Auriemma, Stefano ^a   Santini, Francesco ^a   Mazzucco, Alessandro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STENT; SURVIVAL; XENOGRAFT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; CAUSE OF DEATH; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REOPERATION; STENTS; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 0036839823     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03954-1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. David TE, Pollick C, Bos J. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:113-8.
2. Cohen G, Christakis GT, Buth KJ, et al. Early experience with stentless versus stented valves. Circulation 1997;96:1176-82.
3. Rao V, Christakis GT, Sever J, et al. A novel comparison of stentless versus stented valves in the small aortic root. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:431-6.
4. Del Rizzo DF, Abdoh A, Cartier P, Doty D, Westaby S. The effect of prosthetic valve type on survival after aortic valve surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11:1-8.
5. Collinson J, Henein M, Flather M, Pepper JR, Gibson DG. Valve replacement for aortic stenosis in patients with poor left ventricular function: Comparison of early changes with stented and stentless valves. Circulation 1999;100:111-5.
6. Vrandecic M, Fantini FA, Filho BG, de Oliveira OC, da Costa Junior IM, Vrandecic E. Retrospective clinical analysis of stented vs. stentless porcine aortic bioprostheses. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;18:46-53.
7. Westaby S, Horton M, Jin XY, et al. Survival advantage of stentless aortic bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:785-90.
8. David TE, Puschmann R, Ivanov J, et al. Aortic valve replacement with stentless and stented porcine valves: A case-match study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:236-41.
9. Del Rizzo DF, Goldman BS, Christakis GT, David TE. Hemodynamic benefits of the Toronto stentless valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:1431-45.
10. Edmunds LH Jr, Clarke RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeier GL, Miller DC, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valvular operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:708-11.
11. Walther T, Falk V, Langebartels G, et al. Prospectively randomized evaluation of stentless versus conventional biological aortic valves: Impact on early regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation 1999;100:116-10.
12. Williams RJ, Muir DF, Pathi V, MacArthur K, Berg GA. Randomized controlled trial of stented and stentless aortic bioprostheses: Hemodynamic performance at 3 years. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11:93-7.
13. David TE, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Feindel CM, Cohen G. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:268-77.
14. Gelsomino S, Frassani R, Porreca L, Morocutti G, Morelli A, Livi U. Early and midterm results of model 300 CryoLife-O'Brien stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71(Suppl):S297-301.
15. Yun YL, Jamieson WR, Khonsari S, Burr LH, Munro AI, Sintek CF. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: Hemodynamic comparison of stented and stentless aortic valves. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11:98-102.
16. Del Rizzo DF, Abdoh A, Cartier P, Doty D, Westaby S. Factors affecting left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with stentless valves. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11:114-20.
17. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, et al. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med 1990; 322:1561-6.
18. Thurbrikar M, Deck JD, Aouad J, Nolan SP. Role of mechanical stress in calcification of aortic bioprosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;86:115-25.
19. Jin XY, Westaby S. Aortic root geometry and stentless porcine valve competence. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11:145-50.
20. Luciani GB, Auriemma S, Casali G, Barozzi L, Lamascese N, Mazzucco A. Experience with stentless aortic xenografts. J Heart Valve Dis 2000;9:794-800.
21. Bach DS, LeMire MS, Eberhart D, Armstrong WF, Deeb GM. Impact of intraoperative post-pump aortic regurgitation with stentless aortic bioprostheses. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11:88-92.
22. Jamieson WRE, Lemieux MD, Sullivan JA, Munro I, Metras J, Cartier PC. Medtronic Intact porcine bioprosthesis experience to twelve years. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71(Suppl): S278-81.
23. Hvass U, Chatel D, Assayag P, et al. The O'Bien-Angell stentless porcine valve: Early results with 150 implants. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60(Suppl):S414-7.
24. Schoof PH, Baur LH, Kappetein AP, Hazekamp MG, van Rijk-Zwikker GL, Huysmans HA. Dehiscence of the Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11:133-8.
25. Luciani GB, Bertolini P, Vecchi B, Mazzucco A. Reoperation on stentless aortic xenografts. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66(Suppl):S104-9.