Does pine occurrence influence the macrophyte assemblage in Southern Brazil ponds?

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 675, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 157-165

  Rolon, Ana Silvia ^a   Rocha, Odete ^a   Maltchik, Leonardo ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO CARLOS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE DO VALE DO RIO DOS SINOS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Exotic; Hydroperiod; Nestedness; Ponds; Species loss

Indexed keywords

AFFORESTATION; BIODIVERSITY; CONIFEROUS TREE; GRASSLAND; HABITAT CONSERVATION; HYDROPERIOD; MACROPHYTE; NESTEDNESS; POND; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; SPECIES RICHNESS;

BRAZIL;

PINUS ELLIOTTII;

EID: 79961172161     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: 15735117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-011-0813-2     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Akaike, H., 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19: 716-723.
2. Baselga, A., 2010. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19: 134-143.
3. Bini, L. M., S. M. Thomaz, K. J. Murphy & A. F. M. Camargo, 1999. Aquatic macrophyte distribution in relation to water and sediment conditions in the Itaipu Reservoir, Brazil. Hydrobiologia 415: 147-154.
4. Brose, U., 2001. Relative importance of isolation, area and habitat heterogeneity for vascular plant species richness of temporary wetlands in east-German farmland. Ecography 24: 722-730.
5. Bustamante, R. O. & J. A. Simonetti, 2005. Is Pinus radiata invading the native vegetation in Central Chile? Demographic responses in a fragmented forest. Biological Invasions 7: 243-249.
6. Buytaert, W., V. Iñiguez & B. Bièvre, 2007. The effects of afforestation and cultivation on water yield in Andean páramo. Forest Ecology and Management 251: 22-30.
7. Convention on Biological Diversity, 2003. Report of the expert meeting on methods and guidelines for the rapid assessment of biological diversity of inland water ecosystems. Eighth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, CA. http://www. biodiv. org/doc/meetings/sbstta/sbstta-08/information/sbstta-08-inf-05-en. pdf. Accessed 1 August 2010.
8. Cronk, J. K. & M. S. Fennessy, 2001. Wetland Plants: Biology and Ecology. Lewis Publisher, New York.
9. Czech, H. A. & K. C. Parsons, 2002. Agricultural wetlands and waterbirds: a review. Waterbirds 25: 56-65.
10. Dufrene, M. & P. Legendre, 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67: 345-366.
11. FAO, 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment. www. fao. org/forestry/fra2010. Accessed 10 June 2010.
12. Gao, Z., Z. Zhang & X. Zhang, 2009. Responses of water yield to changes in vegetation at a temporal scale. Frontiers of Forestry in China 4: 53-59.
13. Heegaard, E., H. H. Birks, C. E. Gibson, S. J. Smith & S. Wolfe-Murphy, 2001. Species-environmental relationship of aquatic macrophytes in Northern Ireland. Aquatic Botany 70: 175-223.
14. Irgang, B. E. & C. V. S. Gastal Jr., 1996. Macrófitas aquáticas da planície costeira do RS. Porto Alegre.
15. James, C. S., J. Fisher, V. Russell, S. Collings & B. Moss, 2005. Nitrate availability and hydrophyte species richness in shallow lakes. Freshwater Biology 50: 1049-1063.
16. Jobbágy, E. & R. B. Jackson, 2004. Groundwater use and salinization with grassland afforestation. Global Change Biology 10: 1299-1312.
17. Legendre, P., D. Borcard, G. Blanchet & S. Dray, 2010. PCNM: PCNM spatial eigenfunction and principal coordinate analyses. R package version 2. 1/r82., http://R-Forge. R-project. org/projects/sedar/.
18. Lima, W. P., 1993. Impacto Ambiental do Eucalipto. EDUSP, São Paulo.
19. Lougheed, V. L., B. Crosbie & P. Chow-Fraser, 2001. Primary determinants of macrophyte community structure in 62 marshes across the Great Lakes basin: latitude, land use, and water quality effects. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 1603-1612.
20. Mäkelä, S., E. Huitu & L. Arvola, 2004. Spatial patterns in aquatic vegetation composition and environmental covariates along chains of lakes in the Kokemäenjoki watershed (S. Finland). Aquatic Botany 80: 253-269.
21. Maltchik, L., E. S. Costa, C. G. Becker & A. E. Oliveira, 2003. Inventory of wetlands of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil). Pesquisas: Botânica 53: 89-100.
22. Maltchik, L., A. S. Rolon & P. Schott, 2007. Effects of hydrological variation on the aquatic plant community in a floodplain palustrine wetland of Southern Brasil. Limnology 8: 23-28.
23. McKinney, M. L., 2004. Do exotics homogenize or differentiate communities? Roles of sampling and exotic species richness. Biological Invasions 6: 495-504.
24. McKinney, M. L. & J. L. Lockwood, 1999. Biotic homogenisation: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 450-453.
25. Mitsch, W. J. & J. G. Gosselink, 2000. Wetlands. Wiley, New York.
26. Murphy, K. J., G. Dickinson, S. M. Thomaz, L. M. Bini, K. Dick, K. Greaves, M. P. Kennedy, S. Livingstone, H. McFerran, J. M. Milne, J. Oldroyd & R. A. Wingfield, 2003. Aquatic plant communities and predictors of diversity in a sub-tropical river floodplain: the upper Rio Paraná, Brazil. Aquatic Botany 77: 257-276.
27. Nosetto, M., E. Jobbágy & J. M. Paruelo, 2005. Land-use change and water losses: the case of grassland afforestation across a soil textural gradient in central Argentina. Global Change Biology 11: 1101-1117.
28. OECD, 1996. Guidelines for Aid Agencies for Improved Conservation and Sustainable Use of Tropical and Subtropical Wetlands. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
29. Oksanen, J., R. Kindt, P. Legendre, B. O'Hara, G. L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M. H. H. Stevens & H. Wagner, 2009. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 1. 15-2., http://CRAN. R-project. org/package=vegan.
30. Olden, J. D. & N. L. Poff, 2003. Toward a mechanistic understanding and prediction of biotic homogenization. American Naturalist 162: 442-460.
31. Parris, K. M. & D. B. Lindenmayer, 2004. Evidence that creation of a Pinus radiata plantation in south-eastern Australia has reduced habitat for frogs. Acta Oecologica 25: 93-101.
32. R Development Core Team, 2009. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www. R-project. org.
33. Richardson, D. M., 1998. Forestry trees as invasive aliens. Conservation Biology 12: 18-26.
34. Richardson, D. M. & M. Rejmánek, 2004. Conifers as invasive aliens: a global survey and predictive framework. Diversity and Distributions 10: 321-331.
35. Richardson, D. M., P. A. Willians & R. J. Hobbs, 1994. Pine invasions in the Southern Hemisphere: determinants of spread and invadability. Journal of Biogeography 21: 511-527.
36. Roberts, D. W., 2007. labdsv: Ordination and Multivariate Analysis for Ecology. R package version 1. 3-1., http://ecology. msu. montana. edu/labdsv/R.
37. Rolon, A. S. & L. Maltchik, 2006. Environmental factors as predictors of aquatic macrophyte richness and composition in wetlands of southern Brazil. Hydrobiologia 556: 221-231.
38. Rolon, A. S. & L. Maltchik, 2010. Does flooding of rice fields after cultivation contribute to wetland plant conservation in southern Brazil? Applied Vegetation Science 13: 26-35.
39. Rolon, A. S., L. Maltchik & B. Irgang, 2004. Levantamento de macrófitas aquáticas em áreas úmidas do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Acta Biologica Leopoldensia 26: 17-35.
40. Rolon, A. S., T. Lacerda, L. Maltchik & D. L. Guadagnin, 2008. The influence of area, habitat and water chemistry on richness and composition of macrophyte assemblages in southern Brazil wetlands. Journal of Vegetation Science 19: 221-228.
41. Tagliani, P. R. A., 1995. Estratégia de Planificação Ambiental para o Sistema Ecológico da Restinga da Lagoa dos Patos-Planície Costeira do Rio Grande do Sul. PhD thesis, Universidade Federal de São Carlos.
42. van Geest, G. J., H. Coops, R. M. M. Roijackers, A. D. Buijse & M. Scheffer, 2005. Succession of aquatic vegetation driven by reduced water-level fluctuations in floodplain lakes. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 251-260.
43. Wallace, H. L. & J. E. G. Good, 1995. Effects of afforestation on upload plant communities and implications for vegetation management. Forest Ecology and Management 79: 29-46.
44. Zhang, L., W. R. Dawes & G. R. Walker, 2001. Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resources Research 37: 701-708.