Performing masculinity: Considering gender in doctoral student socialization

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 187-216

  Sallee, Margaret W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961161721     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: 15384640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/jhe.2011.0007     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Acker, J. (1991). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. In J. Lorber & S. A. Farrell (Eds.). The social construction of gender (pp. 162-179). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
2. Anderson, M. S., & Swazey, J. P. (1998). Reflections on the graduate student experience: An overview. New Directions for Higher Education, 101, 3-13.
3. Antony, J. S. (2002). Reexamining doctoral student socialization and professional development: Moving beyond the congruence and assimilation orientation. In J. C. Smart & W. G. Tierney (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 51, pp. 349-380). New York: Agathon Press.
4. Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 94-122.
5. Baird, L. L. (1992). The stages of the doctoral career: Socialization and its consequences. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
6. Becker, H. S., Geer, B., Hughes, E. C., & Strauss, A. L. (1961/2005). Boys in white: Student culture in medical school. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
7. Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8. Bieber, J. P., & Worley, L. K. (2006). Conceptualizing the academic life: Graduate students' perspectives. The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 1009-1035.
9. Britton, D. M. (2000). The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender and Society, 14(3), 418-434.
10. Carrigan, T., Connell, B., & Lee, J. (1985). Toward a new sociology of masculinity. Theory and Society, 14(5), 551-604.
11. Collinson, D. L., & Hearn, J. (2005). Men and masculinities in work, organizations, and management. In M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R. W. Connell (Eds.). Handbook of studies on men & masculinities (pp. 289-310). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
12. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
14. Davis, T. L. (2002). Voices of gender role conflict: The social construction of college men's identity. Journal of College Student Development, 43(4), 508-521.
15. Ferreira, M. M. (2002). Context factors related to women attrition from a graduate science program: A case study. Advancing Women in Leadership Journal, 12, 1-10.
16. Fox, M. F. (1999). Gender, hierarchy, and science. In J. S. Chafetz (Ed.), Handbook of the Sociology of Gender (pp. 441-457). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
17. Gilbert, R., & Gilbert, P. (1998). Masculinity goes to school. London: Routledge.
18. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
19. Glazer-Raymo, J. (1999). Shattering the myths: Women in academe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20. Golde, C. M. (2000). Should I stay or should I go? Student descriptions of the doctoral attrition process. The Review of Higher Education, 23(2), 199-227.
21. Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of today's doctoral students reveal about doctoral education (www.phd-survey.org). Philadelphia: A report prepared by the Pew Charitable Trusts.
22. Hearn, J. (2002). Alternative conceptualizations and theoretical perspectives on identities and organizational cultures: A personal review of research on men in organizations. In I. Aaltio & A. J. Mills (Eds.), Gender, identity and the culture of organizations (pp. 39-56). London: Routledge.
23. Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 301-320.
24. Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(1), 52-88.
25. Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
26. Holland, J. L. (1996). Exploring careers with a typology: What we have learned and some new directions. American Psychologist, 51(4), 397-406.
27. Hollenshead, C. (2003). Women in the academy: Confronting barriers to socialization. In L. S. Hornig (Ed.), Equal rites, unequal outcomes: Women in American research universities (pp. 211-226). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
28. Jome, L. R., & Tokar, D. M. (1998). Dimensions of masculinity and major choice traditionality. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52(1), 120-134.
29. Keller, E. F. (1996). Reflections on gender and science: 10th anniversary edition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30. Kellom, G. E. (2004). Editor's notes. New Directions for Student Services: Developing Effective Programs and Services for College Men, 107, 1-7.
31. Kimmel, M. S. (2001). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In S. M. Whitehead & F. J. Barrett (Eds.), The masculinities reader (pp. 266-287). Cambridge: Polity Press.
32. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
33. Litzler, E., Edwards Lange, S., & Brainard, S. G. (2005). Climate for graduate students in science and engineering departments. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education annual conference & exposition.
34. Macan Ghaill, M. (1994). The making of men: Masculinities, sexualities and schooling. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
35. Mendoza, P. (2007). Academic capitalism and doctoral student socialization: A case study. The Journal of Higher Education, 78, 71-96.
36. Park, S. M. (1996). Research, teaching, and service: Why shouldn't women's work count? The Journal of Higher Education, 67, 46-84.
37. Parsons, T. (1955). The American family: Its relations to personality and to the social structure. In T. Parsons & R. F. Bales, Family, socialization and interaction process (pp. 3-33). New York: The Free Press.
38. Sallee, M. W., & Harris, F. III. (forthcoming). Gender performance in qualitative studies of masculinities. Qualitative Research.
39. Schroeder, D. S., & Mynatt, C. R. (1993). Female graduate students' perceptions of their interactions with male and female major professors. The Journal of Higher Education, 64, 555-573.
40. Schroeder, D. S., & Mynatt, C. R. (1999). Graduate students' relationships with their male and female major professors. Sex Roles, 40(5/6), 393-420.
41. Slaughter, J. E., & Zickar, M. J. (2006). A new look at the role of insiders in the newcomer socialization process. Group Organization Management, 31(2), 264-290.
42. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers.
43. Stake, R.E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
44. Stanley, L. (2002). Should "sex" really be "gender"-or "gender" really be "sex." In S. Jackson & S. Scott (Eds.), Gender: A sociological reader (pp. 31-42). New York: Routledge.
45. Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30(4), 558-564.
46. Tenenbaum, H. R., Crosby, F. J., & Gliner, M. D. (2001). Mentoring relationships in graduate school. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 326-341.
47. Tierney, W. G., & Bensimon, E. M. (2000). (En)gender(ing) socialization. In J. Glazer- Raymo, B. K. Townsend, & B. Ropers-Huilman (Eds.), Women in higher education: A feminist perspective (2nd ed., 309-325). Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing.
48. Tierney, W. G., & Rhoads, R. A. (1994). Faculty socialization as cultural process: A mirror of institutional commitment. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 93-6. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
49. Tong, R. (1989). Feminist thought: A comprehensive introduction. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
50. Van Maanen, J. (1976). Breaking in: Socialization to work. In R. Dubin (Ed.), Handbook of work, organization, and society (pp. 67-130). Chicago: Rand McNally Publishing Company.
51. Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organization behavior: An annual series of analytic essays and critical reviews. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.
52. Weidman, J. C., & Stein, E. L. (2003). Socialization of doctoral students to academic norms. Research in Higher Education, 44(6), 641-656.
53. Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. J. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Volume 28, No. 3, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54. West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995). Doing difference. Gender and Society, 9(1), 8-37.
55. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125-51.
56. Williams, C. L. (1989). Gender differences at work: Women and men in nontraditional occupations. Berkeley: University of California Press.