Gender, Hierarchy, and Science

Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 441-457

  Fox, Mary Frank ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

American Sociological Review; Doctoral Degree; Full Professor; Gender Disparity; Publication Productivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 85126191431     PISSN: 13896903     EISSN: 2542839X     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-36218-5_20     Document Type: Chapter

References (81)

1. Ambrose, S., Dunkle, K., Lazarus, B., Nair, I., & Harkus, D. (1997). Journeys of women in science and engineering. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
2. American Statistical Association (1993). Women Ph.D.s continue to face hurdles in employment in doctoral-granting institutions. Amstat News, 204, 4.
3. Artz, F. (1966). The development of technical education in France: 1500-1800. Cambridge: MIT Press.
4. Barnes, B. (1974). Interests and the growth of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
5. Bechtel, H. K. (1989). Introduction. In W. Pearson & H. K. Bechtel (Eds.), Blacks, scientists, and American education (pp 1-20). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
6. Benjamin, M. (1991). Introduction. In M. Benjamin (Ed.), Science and sensibility: Gender and scientific inquiry, 1750-1984 (pp 1-23). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
7. Beyer, J. M. (1978). Editorial policies and practices among leading journals in four scientific disciplines. Sociological Quarterly, 19, 68-88.
8. Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
9. Blume, S. S., & Sinclair, R. (1973). Chemists in British Universities. American Sociological Review, 38, 126-138.
10. Boston Women’s Health Collective (1971-1976). Our bodies, ourselves (revised and expanded second edition). New York: Simon & Schuster [first edition published by New England Free Press, 1971].
11. Bush, V. (1945-1990). The endless frontier. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
12. Cardwell, D. S. L. (1957). The organization of science in England. London: Heinemann.
13. Clark, B. (1987). The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Cockburn, C. (1985). Machinery of dominance: Women, men, and technical knowhow. London: Pluto Press.
15. Cockburn, C., & Furst-Dilic, R. (1994). Introduction: Looking for the gender/technology relation. In C. Cockburn & R. Furst-Dilic (Eds.), Bringing technology home: Gender and technology in a changing Europe (pp 1-21. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
16. Cole, J. (1979). Fair science: Women in the scientific community. New York: The Free Press.
17. Cole, J. & Cole, S. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Cole, J., & Zuckerman, H. (1984). The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication among women and men scientists. In P. Maehr & M. W. Steinkamp (Eds.), Women in science (pp 217-256). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
19. Cole, S. (1992). Making science: Between nature and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology (CPST) (1997). Professional women and minorities: A total human resources data compendium (12th ed.). Washington, D.C.: CPST.
21. Cozzens, S., & Woodhouse, E. (1995). Science, government, and the politics of knowledge. In S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp 533-553). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Derber, C. W., Schwartz, W., & Magress, Y. (1990). Power in the highest degree; Professionals and the rise of a new Mandarin order. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Ehrenreich, B., & English, D. (1973). Complaints and disorders: The sexual politics of sickness. Old Westbury, NY: The Feminist Press.
24. Ehrenreich, B., & English, D. (1978). For her own good: 150 years of the experts’ advice to women. Garden City: NY: Anchor/Doubleday.
25. Evetts, J. (1996). Gender and career in science and engineering. London: Taylor & Francis.
26. Fox, M. F. (1981). Sex, salary, and achievement: Reward-dualism in academia. Sociology of Education, 54, 71-84.
27. Fox, M. F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 13, 285-305.
28. Fox, M. F. (1986). Mind, nature, and masculinity. Contemporary Sociology, 15, 197-199.
29. Fox, M. F. (1991). Gender, environmental milieu, and productivity in science. In H. Zuckerman, J. Cole, & J. Bruer (Eds.), The outer circle: Women in the scientific community (pp 188-204). New York: Norton.
30. Fox, M. F. (1995). Women and scientific careers. In S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp 205-223). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Fox, M. F. (1996). Women, academia, and careers in science and engineering. In C. Davis, A. Ginorio, C. Hollenshead, B. Lazarus, & P. Rayman (Eds.), The equity equation: Fostering the advancement of women in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering (pp 265-289). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Fox, M. F. (1998). Women in science and engineering: Theory, practice, and policy in programs. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 24, 201-223.
33. Fox, M. F., & Braxton, J. M. (1994). Misconduct and social control in science. The Journal of Higher Education, 65, 373-383.
34. Gaston, J. (1978). The reward system in British and American science. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
35. Gibbons, A. (1992). Key issue: Tenure. Science, 255, 1386.
36. Hacker, S. (1989). Pleasure, power, and technology. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
37. Hacker, S. (1990). “Doing it the hard way”: Investigations of gender and technology. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
38. Hanson, S. (1996). Lost talent: Women in the sciences. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
39. Harding, S. (1983). Why has the sex gender system become visible only now? In S. Harding & M. B. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality (pp 311-324). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
40. Hargens, L. & Hagstrom, W. (1982). Consensus and status attainment patterns in scientific disciplines. Sociology of Education, 55, 183-196.
41. Harraway, D. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
42. Harrison, M. I. (1994). Diagnosing organizations: Methods, models, and processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Helmreich, R., Spence, J., Beane, W., Lucker, W., & Matthews, K. (1980). Making it in academic psychology: Demographic and personality correlates of attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 896-908.
44. Hodgkin, L. (1981). Mathematics and revolution from Lacroix to Cauchy. In H. Mehrtens, H. Bos, & I. Schneider (Eds.), Social history of nineteenth century mathematics (pp 50-71). Boston: Birkhauser.
45. Jasanoff, S., Markle, G., Petersen, J., & Pinch, T. (1995). Handbook of science and technology studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Keller, E. F. (1983). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. New York: W. H. Freeman.
47. Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
48. Keller, E. F. (1995). The origin, history, and politics of the subject called ‘gender and science’. In S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp 80-94). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Kolodny, A. (1975). The lay of the land: Metaphor as experience and history in American life and letters. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
50. Long, J. S. (1992). Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces, 71, 159-178.
51. Long, J. S., Allison, P., McGinnis, R. (1993). Rank-advancement in Academic careers: Sex differences and the effects of productivity. American Sociological Review, 58, 703-722.
52. Long, J. S., & Fox, M. F. (1995). Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 45-71.
53. Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 26, 317.
54. McNeil, M. (1987). Being reasonable feminists. In M. McNeil (Ed.), Gender and expertise (pp 13-61). London: Free Association Press.
55. Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. New York: Harper & Row.
56. Merton, R. K. (1942-1973). The normative structure of science. In N. Storer (Ed.), The sociology of science (pp 267-278). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57. Mitroff, I. (1974). Norms and counternorms in a select group of Apollo moon scientists. American Sociological Review, 39, 379-395.
58. Morin, A. J. (1993). Science policy and politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
59. Mulkay, M. (1976). Norms and ideology in science. Social Science Information, 15, 627-636.
60. Mulkay, M. (1979). Science and the sociology of knowledge. London: Allen and Unwin.
61. National Center for Education Statistics (1993). Digest of education statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
62. Noble, D. (1977). America by design. New York: Knopf.
63. Ortner, S. (1972). Is female to male as nature is to culture? Feminist Studies, 1, 5-31.
64. Pfeffer, J., Salanick, G. R., & Leblebici, H. (1996) The effect of uncertainty on the use of social influence in organizational decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 227-245.
65. Primack, R. B., & O’Leary, V. E. (1989). Research productivity of men and women ecologists. Bulletin of the Ecological Association of America, 70, 7-12.
66. Rathgeber, E. M. (1995). Schooling for what? In United Nations Commission on Science and Technology for Development (Ed.), Missing links: Gender equity in science and technology for development (pp 181-200). New York: International Development Research Centre.
67. Reskin, B. (1978). Scientific productivity, sex, and location in the institution of science. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 1235-1243.
68. Roscher, N. M. (1990). Women chemists, 1990. Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society.
69. Rossiter, M. (1982). Women scientists in America: Struggles and strategies to 1940. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
70. Sayre, A. (1975). Rosalind Franklin and DNA. New York: Norton.
71. Schneider, I. (1981). Introduction. In H. Mehrtens, H. Bos, & I. Schneider (Eds.), Social history of nineteenth century mathematics (pp 75-88). Boston: Birkhauser
72. Sonnert, G., & Holton, G. (1995a). Gender differences in science careers. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
73. Sonnert, G. & Holton, G. (1995b). Who succeeds in science? The gender dimension. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
74. University of Wisconsin (1991). Retaining and promoting women and minority faculty: Problems and possibilities. Madison, WI: Office of Equal Opportunity and Policy Studies.
75. Vetter, B. (1992). Ferment: Yes, progress: Maybe, change: Slow. Mosaic, 23, 34-41.
76. Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
77. Ward, K., & Grant, L. (1995). Gender and academic publishing. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, Vol. 11 (pp 175-215). New York: Agathon.
78. Yoels, W. C. (1974). The structure of scientific fields and the allocation of editorships on scientific journals: Some observations on the politics of knowledge. Sociological Quarterly, 15, 264-276.
79. Zuckerman, H. (1987). Persistence and change in careers of men and women scientists and engineers. In L. Dix (Ed.), Women: Their underrepresentation and career differentials in science and engineering (pp 123-156). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
80. Zuckerman, H. (1988). The sociology of science. In N. J. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (pp 511-574). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
81. Zuckerman, H., Cole, J., & Bruer, J. (1991). The Outer circle: Women in the scientific community. New York: Norton.