Generalizing-promoting actions: How classroom collaborations can support students' mathematical generalizations

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 308-345

  Ellis, Amy B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Algebra; Classroom interaction; Collaborative learning; Constant comparison methods; Functions; Intermediate middle grades; Qualitative methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961057489     PISSN: 00218251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5951/jresematheduc.42.4.0308     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Bauersfeld, H. (1995). The structuring of the structures: Development and function of mathematizing as a social practice. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 137-158). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Becker, J., & Rivera, F. (2006). Establishing and justifying algebraic generalization at the sixth grade level. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehliková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 465-472). Prague, Czech Republic: PME.
3. Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. (2002, April). Developing elementary teachers 'algebra "eyes and ears ": Understanding characteristics of professional development that promote generative and self-sustaining change in teacher practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
4. Blanton, M., & Stylianou, D. (2010, April). Discourse and knowing in undergraduate students 'understanding of proof: What difference do our words make? Paper presented at the Research Presession of the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, San Diego, CA.
5. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Bruner, J. S., & Bornstein, M. H. (1989). On interaction. In M. H. Bornstein & J. S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development (pp. 1-7). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Carpenter, T. P., & Franke, M. L. (2001). Developing algebraic reasoning in the elementary school: Generalization and proof. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, & J. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th ICMI study conference: The future of the teaching and learning of algebra (pp. 155-162). Melbourne, Australia: The University of Melbourne.
8. Carraher, D. W., Nemirovsky, R., & Schliemann, A. D. (1995). Situated generalization. In L. Meira & D. Carraher (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, p. 234). Recife, Brazil: Program Committee of the 19th PME Conference.
9. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271-315. doi:10.1207/sl5327809jls0603-1 (Pubitemid 127493191)
10. Cobb, P. (2005, April). Collective abstraction as a shift in the social situation of learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
11. Cobb, P., & Bauersfeld, H. (Eds.). (1995). The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Cobb, P., Boufi, A., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Reflective discourse and collective reflection. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8, 258-277.
13. Cobb, P., & Steffe, L. P. (1983). The constructivist researcher as teacher and model builder. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 258-277.
14. Coxford, A. E., Fey, J. T., Hirsch, C. R., Schoen, H. L., Burrill, G., Hart, E. W., & Watkins, A. E. (with Messenger, M. J., & Ritsema, B.). (1998). Contemporary mathematics in context. Chicago, IL: Everyday Learning.
15. Davydov, V. V. (1990). Soviet studies in mathematics education: Vol. 2. Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
16. Davydov, V. V. (1975). Logical and psychological problems of elementary mathematics as an academic subject. In L. P. Steffe (Ed.), Soviet studies in the psychology of learning and teaching mathematics: Vol. VII. Children's capacity for learning mathematics (pp. 55-107). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
17. Dreyfus, T. (1991). Advanced mathematical thinking processes. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 25-41). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
18. Dreyfus, T., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. (2001). The construction of abstract knowledge in interaction. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 377-384). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute.
19. Dubinsky, E. (1991). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 95-123). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
20. Ellis, A. B. (2007). A taxonomy for categorizing generalizations: Generalizing actions and reflection generalizations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 221-262. doi:10.1080/10508400701193705
21. Engle, R. A. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 451-498. (Pubitemid 44831783)
22. English, L. D., & Warren, E. A. (1995). General reasoning processes and elementary algebraic understanding: Implications for initial instruction. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 17(4), 1-19. (Pubitemid 126080887)
23. Forman, E. A., Larreamendy-Joerns, J., Stein, M. K., & Brown, C. A. (1998). "You're going to want to find out which and prove it": Collective argumentation in a mathematics classroom. Learning and Instruction, 8, 527-548. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752 (98) 00033-4 (Pubitemid 128340269)
24. Garcia-Cruz, J. A., & Martinón, A. (1997). Actions and invariant schemata in linear generalising problems. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 289-296). Lahti, Finland: PME.
25. Goldstone, R. L., & Wilensky, U. (2008). Promoting transfer by grounding complex systems principles. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 465-516. doi:10.1080/10508400802394898
26. Hall, R., & Rubin, A. (1998). There's five little notches in here: Dilemmas in teaching and learning the conventional structure of rate. In J. G. Greeno & S. V Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 189-236). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Harel, G., & Tall, D. (1991). The general, the abstract, and the generic. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(1), 38-42.
28. Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2003, April). Examining "norms" in mathematics education literature: Refining the lens. Paper presented at the Research Presession of the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, San Antonio, TX.
29. Hershkowitz, R., Schwarz, B. B., & Dreyfus, T. (2001). Abstraction in context: Epistemic actions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 195-222. (Pubitemid 33246390)
30. Hollebrands, K. F. (2007). The role of a dynamic software program for geometry in the strategies high school mathematics students employ. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 164-192.
31. Hoyles, C., Noss, R., & Pozzi, S. (2001). Proportional reasoning in nursing practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 4-27.
32. Jones, K. (2000). Providing a foundation for deductive reasoning: Students' interpretations when using dynamic geometry software and their evolving mathematical explanations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 55-85. doi:10.1023/A:1012789201736 (Pubitemid 33369170)
33. Jurow, A. S. (2004). Generalizing in interaction: Middle school mathematics students making mathematical generalizations in a population-modeling project. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11, 279-300.
34. Kaput, J. J. (1999). Teaching and learning a new algebra with understanding. In E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 133-155). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Kieran, C. (2004). The core of algebra: Reflections on its main activities. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), New ICMI study series: Vol. 8. The future of teaching and learning of algebra: The 12th ICMI Study (pp. 21-34). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
36. Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 390-419). New York, NY: Macmillan.
37. Koellner, K., Pittman, M., & Frykholm, J. (2008). Talking generally or generally talking in an algebra classroom. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14, 304-310.
38. Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren (J. Teller, Trans.; J. Kilpatrick & I. Wirszup, Eds.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39. Lannin, J. K. (2005). Generalization and justification: The challenge of introducing algebraic reasoning through patterning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7, 231-258. (Pubitemid 41174256)
40. Lannin, J., Barker, D, & Townsend, B. (2006). Algebraic generalisation strategies: Factors influencing student strategy selection. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(3), 3-28.
41. Lappan, G., Fey, J., Fitzgerald, W., Friel, S., & Phillips, E. (2002). Connected mathematics project. Ann Arbor, MI: Dale Seymour Publications.
42. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Lee, L. (1996). An initiation into algebraic culture through generalization activities. In A. J. Bishop (Managing Ed.), N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Vol. Eds.), Mathematics education library: Vol. 18. Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 87-106). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
44. Lee, L., & Wheeler, D. (1987). Algebraic thinking in high school students: Their conceptions of generalization and justification (Research Report). Montreal, Canada: Concordia University, Department of Mathematics.
45. Lehrer, R., Strom, D., & Confrey, J. (2002). Grounding metaphors and inscriptional resonance: Children's emerging understanding of mathematical similarity. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 359-398. (Pubitemid 36593953)
46. Mariotti, M. A., & Bartolini Bussi, M. G. (1998). From drawing to construction: Teacher's mediation within the Cabri environment. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 247-255). Stellenbosch, South Africa: University of Stellenbosch.
47. Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In A. J. Bishop (Managing Ed.), N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Vol. Eds.), Mathematics education library: Vol. 18. Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 65-86). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
48. Murdock, J., Kamischke, E. & Kamischke, E. (2004). Discovering advanced algebra: An investigative approach. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
49. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
50. Nemirovsky, R. (2002). On guessing the essential thing. In A. J. Bishop (Managing Ed.), K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Vol. Eds.), Mathematics education library: Vol. 30. Symbolizing, modeling, and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 233-256). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
51. Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Mathematics education library: Vol. 17. Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning cultures and computers (A. J. Bishop, Managing Ed.). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
52. O'Connor, M. C, & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 63-102). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
53. Orton, A., & Orton, J. (1994). Students' perception and use of pattern and generalization. In J. P. da Ponte & J. F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 407-414). Lisbon, Portugal: PME Program Committee.
54. Pegg, J., & Redden, E. (1990). Procedures for, and experiences in, introducing algebra in New South Wales. Mathematics Teacher, 83, 386-391.
55. Piaget, J., & Henriques, G. (1978). Études d'épistemologie et de psychologie génétiques: Tome 36. Recherches sur la généralisation [Studies of genetic epistemology and psychology: Vol. 36. Research on generalization]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
56. Pierson, J., & Whitacre, I. (2010, April). Interaction in the mathematics classroom: Patterns in teacher-student dialogue and their relationship to learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
57. Reid, D. (2002). Conjectures and refutations in grade 5 mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 5-29.
58. Rivera, F., & Becker, J. R. (2004). A sociocultural account of students' collective mathematical understanding of polynomial inequalities in instrumented activity. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 81-88). Bergen, Norway: PME.
59. Schliemann, A. D., Carraher, D. W., & Brizuela, B. M. (2001). When tables become function tables. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 145-152). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
60. Sfard, A. (1995). The development of algebra: Confronting historical and psychological perspectives. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14, 15-39.
61. Shulman, L. S. (1983). Autonomy and obligation: The remote control of teaching. In L. S. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 484-504). New York, NY: Longman.
62. Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114-145.
63. Stacey, K. (1989). Finding and using patterns in linear generalising problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 147-164.
64. Stacey, K., & MacGregor, M. (1997). Building foundations for algebra. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 2, 253-260.
65. Steffe, L., & Izsák, A. (2002). Pre-service middle-school teachers' construction of linear equation concepts through quantitative reasoning. In D. Mewborn, P. Sztajn, D. White, H. Wiegel, R. Bryant, & K. Noony (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 1163-1172). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
66. Steffe, L., and Tzur, R. (1994). Interaction and children's mathematics. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 8, 99-116. doi:10.1080/ 0256854940959485
67. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
68. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
69. Szombathely, A., & Szarvas, T. (1998). Ideas for developing students' reasoning: A Hungarian perspective. Mathematics Teacher, 91, 677-681.
70. Talmon, V, & Yerushalmy, M. (2004). Understanding dynamic behavior: Parent-child relations in dynamic geometry environments. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 91-119. (Pubitemid 39499316)
71. Temple, C, & Doerr, H. (2010, April). Talking mathematics in a 10th-grade classroom: A second language acquisition perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
72. Thompson, P. W. (1994). The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to concepts of rate. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 181-234). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
73. Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Pergamon.
74. Voigt, J. (1995). Thematic patterns of interaction and sociomathematical norms. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), Emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 163-201). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.