Assessment of linear-scale indices for perimetry in terms of progression in early glaucoma

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 16, 2011, Pages 1801-1810

  Gardiner, Stuart K ^a   Demirel, Shaban ^a   Johnson, Chris A ^b   Swanson, William H ^c  

^a DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Perimetry; Progression; Quantification; Visual field

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CELL COUNT; CELL LOSS; CELL SURVIVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PERIMETRY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RETINA GANGLION CELL; VISUAL FIELD;

DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 79961031317     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anderson R. The psychophysics of glaucoma: Improving the structure/function relationship. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2006, 25(1):79-97.
2. Anderson D., Patella V. Automated static perimetry 1999, (pp. 147-159), Mosby, St. Louis, MO.
3. Artes P.H., Chauhan B.C., Keltner J.L., Cello K.E., Johnson C.A., Anderson D.R., et al. Longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses of visual field progression in participants of the ocular hypertension treatment study. Archives of Ophthalmology 2010, 128(12):1528-1532.
4. Artes P.H., O'Leary N., Hutchison D., Heckler L., Sharpe G., Nicolela M.T., et al. Properties of the statpac visual field index. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2011, 52(7):4030-4038.
5. Artes P.H., Nicolela M.T., LeBlanc R.P., Chauhan B.C. Visual field progression in glaucoma: Total versus pattern deviation analyses. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2005, 46(12):4600-4606.
6. Bengtsson B., Heijl A. False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: Indicators of patient performance or test reliability?. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2000, 41(8):2201-2204.
7. Bengtsson B., Heijl A. A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2008, 145(2):343-353.
8. Bengtsson B., Leske M., Hyman L., Heijl A. Fluctuation of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology 2007, 114(2):205-209.
9. Bengtsson B., Olsson J., Heijl A., Rootzen H. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmologica 1997, 75:368-375.
10. Bowd C., Zangwill L., Medeiros F., Tavares I., Hoffmann E., Bourne R., et al. Structure-function relationships using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, optical coherence tomography, and scanning laser polarimetry. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2006, 47(7):2889-2895.
11. Broman A., Quigley H., West S., Katz J., Munoz B., Bandeen-Roche K., et al. Estimating the rate of progressive visual field damage in those with open-angle glaucoma, from cross-sectional data. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2008, 49(1):66-76.
12. Caprioli J. Correlation of visual function with optic nerve and nerve fiber layer structure in glaucoma. Survey of Ophthalmology 1989, 33(S):319-330.
13. Caprioli J., Mock D., Bitrian E., Afifi A., Yu F., Nouri-Madhavi K., et al. Rates of damage in glaucoma: Techniques to measure rates of regional visual field change. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2010, 51(5):2053. (E-Abstract).
14. Drance S., Anderson D., Schulzer M. Risk factors for progression of visual field abnormalities in normal-tension glaucoma. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2001, 131(6):699-708.
15. Drasdo N., Mortlock K., North R. Ganglion cell loss and dysfunction: Relationship to perimetric sensitivity. Optometry and Vision Science 2008, 85(11):1036-1042.
16. Fitzke F., Hitchings R., Poinoosawmy D., McNaught A., Crabb D. Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1996, 80:40-48.
17. Fortune B., Demirel S., Zhang X., Hood D., Patterson E., Jamil A., et al. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2007, 48(3):1173-1180.
18. Friedman D., Wilson M., Liebmann J., Fechtner R., Weinreb R. An evidence-based assessment of risk factors for the progression of ocular hypertension and glaucoma. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2004, 138(3, Suppl. 1):19-31.
19. Gardiner S., Crabb D. Examination of different pointwise linear regression methods for determining visual field progression. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2002, 43:1400-1407.
20. Gardiner S., Demirel S., Johnson C. Perimetric indices as predictors of future glaucomatous functional change. Optometry and Vision Science 2011, 88(1):56-62.
21. Gardiner S.K., Johnson C.A., Cioffi G.A. Evaluation of the structure-function relationship in glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2005, 46(10):3712-3717.
22. Garway-Heath D., Caprioli J., Fitzke F., Hitchings R. Scaling the hill of vision: The physiological relationship between light sensitivity and ganglion cell numbers. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2000, 41:1774-1782.
23. Gonzalez-Hernandez M., Pablo L.E., Armas-Dominguez K., Rodriguez de la Vega R., Ferreras A., Gonzalez de la Rosa M. Structure-function relationship depends on glaucoma severity. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2009, 93:1195-1199.
24. Gordon M., Beiser J., Brandt J., Heuer D., Higginbotham E., Johnson C., et al. The ocular hypertension treatment study: Baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Archives of Ophthalmology 2002, 120(6):714-720.
25. Harwerth R., Carter-Dawson L., Smith E., Barnes G., Holt W., Crawford M. Neural losses correlated with visual losses in clinical perimetry. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2004, 45(9):3152-3160.
26. Harwerth R., Crawford M., Frishman L., Viswanathan S., Smith E., Carter-Dawson L. Visual field defects and neural losses from experimental glaucoma. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2002, 21(1):91-125.
27. Harwerth R., Quigley H. Visual field defects and retinal ganglion cell losses in patients with glaucoma. Archives of Ophthalmology 2006, 124(6):853-859.
28. Harwerth R., Vilupuru A., Rangaswamy N., Smith E. The relationship between nerve fiber layer and perimetry measurements. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2007, 48(2):763-773.
29. Harwerth R.S., Wheat J.L., Fredette M.J., Anderson D.R. Linking structure and function in glaucoma. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2010, 29(4):249-271.
30. Henson D., Artes P., Chauhan B. Diffuse loss of sensitivity in early glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 1999, 40:3147-3151.
31. Henson D., Chaudry S., Artes P., Faragher E., Ansons A. Response variability in the visual field: Comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2000, 41:417-421.
32. Hong S., Seong G., Hong Y. Long-term intraocular pressure fluctuation and progressive visual field deterioration in patients with glaucoma and low intraocular pressures after a triple procedure. Archives of Ophthalmology 2007, 125(8):1010-1013.
33. Hood D. Relating retinal nerve fiber thickness to behavioral sensitivity in patients with glaucoma: Application of a linear model. Journal of the Optical Society of America A - Optics and Image Science 2007, 24(5):1426-1430.
34. Hood D., Anderson S., Wall M., Kardon R. Structure versus function in glaucoma: An Application of a linear model. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2007, 48(8):3662-3668.
35. Hood D.C., Anderson S.C., Wall M., Raza A.S., Kardon R.H. A test of a linear model of glaucomatous structure-function loss reveals sources of variability in retinal nerve fiber and visual field measurements. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2009, 50(9):4254-4266.
36. Hood D., Kardon R. A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2007, 26(6):688-710.
37. Hot A., Dul M., Swanson W. Development and evaluation of a contrast sensitivity perimetry test for patients with glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2008, 49(7):3049-3057.
38. Kass M.A., Gordon M.O., Gao F., Heuer D.K., Higginbotham E.J., Johnson C.A., et al. Delaying treatment of ocular hypertension: The ocular hypertension treatment study. Archives of Ophthalmology 2010, 128(3):276-287.
39. Leske M.C., Heijl A., Hussein M., Bengtsson B., Hyman L., Komaroff E., et al. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: The early manifest glaucoma trial. Archives of Ophthalmology 2003, 121(1):48-56.
40. Malik R., Swanson W., Garway-Heath D. Development and evaluation of a linear staircase strategy for the measurement of perimetric sensitivity. Vision Research 2006, 46(18):2956-2967.
41. Nagelkerke N.J.D. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 1991, 78(3):691-692.
42. Nouri-Mahdavi K., Hoffman D., Coleman A., Liu G., Li G., Gaasterland D., et al. Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the advanced glaucoma intervention study. Ophthalmology 2004, 111(9):1627-1635.
43. Poinoosawmy D., Fontana L., Wu J.X., Fitzke F.W., Hitchings R.A. Variation of nerve fibre layer thickness measurements with age and ethnicity by scanning laser polarimetry. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1997, 81(5):350-354.
44. Redmond, T., Garway-Heath, D. F., Zlatkova, M., & Anderson, R. S. (2010). Sensitivity loss in early glaucoma can be mapped to an enlargement of the area of complete spatial summation. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (published ahead of print, 29 July 2010).
45. Spry P., Johnson C., Mansberger S., Cioffi G. Psychophysical investigation of ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma. Journal of Glaucoma 2005, 14(1):11-18.
46. Steiger J. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin 1980, 87:245-251.
47. Strouthidis N., Vinciotti V., Tucker A., Gardiner S., Crabb D., Garway-Heath D. Structure and function in glaucoma: The relationship between a functional visual field map and an anatomical retinal map. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2006, 47:5356-5362.
48. Viswanathan A., Fitzke F., Hitchings R. Early detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: A comparison of Progressor and Statpac2. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1997, 81:1037-1042.
49. Yang A., Swanson W.H. A new pattern electroretinogram paradigm evaluated in terms of user friendliness and agreement with perimetry. Ophthalmology 2007, 114(4):671-679.