Cell/surface interactions and adhesion on Ti-6AI-4V: Effects of surface texture

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 360-373

  Chen, J ^a   Mwenifumbo, S ^a   Langhammer, C ^a   McGovern, J P ^a   Li, M ^b   Beye, A ^c   Soboyejo, W O ^a  

^a Princeton University   (United States)

^b Spectra Physics Lasers Division   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ CHEIKH ANTA DIOP   (Senegal)

Author keywords

Cell spreading and adhesion; Enzymatic detachment; Immunofluorescence staining; Surface texture

Indexed keywords

BIOASSAY; CELL ADHESION; FLUORESCENCE; PROTEINS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM ALLOYS;

BIOMEDICAL SYSTEMS; CELL SPREADING; ENZYMATIC DETACHMENT; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE STAINING;

TEXTURES;

ACTIN; ALUMINUM DERIVATIVE; TITANIUM DERIVATIVE; VANADIUM DERIVATIVE; VINCULIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL INTERACTION; ENZYME ASSAY; GEOMETRY; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; LASER; NONHUMAN; OSTEOSARCOMA; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ACTINS; ALUMINUM OXIDE; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL MEMBRANE; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; VINCULIN;

EID: 34547103235     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30741     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. Growth in rates of joint replacement. Available at http://www.aaos.org/wordhtml/research/stats/fig22.htm
2. Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE. Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996.
3. Schmalzried T, Kwong L, Jasty M, Sedlacek R, Haire T, O'Connor D, Bragdon C, Kabo J, Malcolm A, Harris W. The mechanism of loosening of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of specimens retrieved at autopsy. Clin Orthop 1992;274:60-64.
4. Dumbleton JH, Manley MT, Edidin AA. A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002;15:649-661.
5. Bobyn J, Jacobs J, Tanzer M, Urban R, Aribindi R, Sumner D, Turner T, Brooks C. The susceptibility of smooth implant surfaces to peri-implant fibrosis and migration of polyethylene wear debris. Clin Orthop 1995;311:21-39.
6. Cooke CC, Hozack W, Lavernia C, Sharkey P, Shastri S, Rothman RH. Early failure mechanisms of constrained tripolar acetabular sockets used in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003;18:827-833.
7. Kesteris U, Hardinge K, Ilchmann T, Wingstrand H. Polyethylene wear in prosthetic hips with loose components. J Arthroplasty 2003;18:10-15.
8. Dorr LD, Lewonowski K, Lucero M, Harris M, Wan Z. Failure mechanisms of anatomic porous replacement I cementless total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1997;1:157-167.
9. Gruen TA, McNeice CM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stemtype femoral components. Clin Orthop 1979;141:17-27.
10. Zhu YH, Chiu KY, Tang WM. Review article: Polyethylene wear and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg 2001;9:91-99.
11. Harris WH. The problem is osteolysis. Clin Orthop 1995;311:46-53.
12. Brunette DM. Titanium in Medicine: Material Science, Surface Science, Engineering, Biological Responses and Medical Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2001.
13. Burke DW, O'Connor D, Zalenski EB. Micromotion of cemented and uncemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Br B 1991;73:33-37.
14. Pioletti DP, Muller J, Rakotomanana LR, Corbeil J, Wild E. Effect of micromechanical stimulations on osteoblasts: Development of a device simulating the mechanical situation at the bone-implant interface. J Biomech 2003;36:131-135.
15. Aspenberg P, Herbertsson P. Periprosthetic bone resorption: Particles versus movement. J Bone Joint Surg Br B 1996;78:641-646.
16. Thornhill TS. Mechanisms of failures of total hip arthroplasty. In: Bono JV, McCarthy JC, Thornhill TS, Bierbaum BE, Turner RH, editors. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. New York: Springer; 1998. pp 1-2.
17. Bugbee WD, Culpepper WJ II, Eng CA Jr, Eng CA Sr. Long-term clinical consequences of stress-shielding after total hip arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:1007-1012.
18. Willert HG, Buchhorn GH. The biology of the loosening of hip implants. In: Jakob RP, Fulford P, Horan F, editors. European Instructional Course Lectures, Vol 4. London: The British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery; 1999. pp 58-82.
19. Turner CH. Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli. Bone 1998;23:399-407.
20. Ingber D. Mechanical signaling. Ann NY Acad Sci 2002;961:162-163.
21. Feng B, Weng J, Yang BC, Chen JY, Zhao JZ, He L, Qi SK, Zhang XD. Surface characterization of titanium and adsorption of bovine serum album. Mater Charact 2003;49:129-137.
22. Feng B, Chen JY, Qi SK, He L, Zhao JZ, Zhang XD. Characterization of surface oxide films on titanium and bioactivity. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2002;13:457-464.
23. Menezes GC, Elias CN, Attias M, Silvia-Filho FC. Osteoblast adhesion onto titanium dental implants. Acta Microsc 2003;12:13-19.
24. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials 2000;21:667-681.
25. Silver FH, Christiansen DL. Biomaterials Science and Biocompatibility, 1st ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1999.
26. Alberts B, Bray D, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Watson JD. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 3rd ed. New York: Garland; 1995.
27. Lauffenberger DA, Horwitz AF. Cell migration: A physically integrated molecular process. Cell 1996;84:359-369.
28. Burridge K, Fath K, Kelly T, Nuckolls G, Turner C. Focal adhesions: Transmembrane junctions between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. Ann Rev Cell Biol 1988;4:487-525.
29. Walboomers XF, Jansen JA. Cell and tissue behavior on micro-grooved surfaces. Odontology 2001;89:2-11.
30. Brunette DM. Effects of surface topography of implant materials on cell behaviour in vitro and in vivo. In: Hoch HC, editor. Nanofabrication and Biosystems. Cambridge: Cambridge Press; 1996.
31. Chesmal KD, Black J. Cellular responses to chemical and morphologic aspects of biomaterial surfaces. I. A novel in vitro system. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1089-1099.
32. Chesmal KD, Clark CC, Brighton CT, Black J. Cellular responses to chemical and morphologic aspects of biomaterial surfaces. I. The biosynthetic and migratory response of bone cell populations. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1101-1110.
33. Curtis ASG, Clark P. The effect of topographic and mechanical properties of materials on cell behavior. Crit Rev Biocompat 1990;5:343-362.
34. Anselme K, Linez P, Bigerelle M, Le Maguer D, Le Maguer A, Hardouin P, Hildebrand HF, Iost A, Leroy JM. The relative influence of the topography and chemistry on Ti6A14V surfaces on osteoblastic cell behaviour. Biomaterials 2000;21:1567-1577.
35. Anselme K, Bigerelle M, Noel B, Dufresne E, Judas D, Iost A, Hardouin P. Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughnesses. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;49:155-166.
36. Ricci JL, Alexander H. Laser microtexturing of implant surfaces for enhanced tissue integration. Key Eng Mater 2001;198/ 199:179-202.
37. Ricci JL, Charvet J, Frenkel SR, Chang R, Nadkarni P, Turner J, Alexander H. Bone response to laser microtextured surfaces. In: Davies JE, editor. Bone Engineering. Toronto: Em2; 2000. pp 1-11.
38. Soboyejo WO, Mercer C, Allameh S, Nemetski B, Marcantonio N, Ricci JL. Multi-scale microstructural characterization of micro-textured Ti-6Al-4V surfaces. Key Eng Mater 2001;198/199:203-230.
39. Anselme K, Noel B, Hardoun P. Human osteoblast adhesion to titanium alloy stainless steel, glass and plastic substrates with the same surface topography. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 1999;10:815-819.
40. Wang JH, Grood ES, Florer J, Wenstrup R. Alignment and proliferation of MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts in microgrooved silicone substrate subjected to cyclic stretching. J Biomech 2000;33:729-735.
41. Soboyejo WO, Nemetski B, Allameh S, Marcantonio N, Mercer C, Ricci J. Interactions between MC3T3-E1 cells and textured Ti6Al4V surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;62:56-72.
42. Curtis A, Wilkinson C. Topographical control of cells. Biomaterials 1997;18:1573-1583.
43. Walboomers XF, Monaghan W, Curtis A, Jansen JA. Attachment of fibroblasts on smooth and microgrooved polystyrene. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;46:212-220.
44. Ingber D. Tensegrity: The architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. Annu Rev Physiol 1997;59:575-599.
45. Meyle J, Wolburg H, von Recum AF. Surface micromorphology and cellular interactions. J Biomater Appl 1993;7:362-374.
46. van Kooten TG, von Recum AF. The influence of micro-topography on cellular response and the implications for silicone implants. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1995;7:181-193.
47. Li M, Morris N, Mwenifumbo S, Keirstead M, Soboyejo W. Surface modification of titanium alloy using a Q-switched diode-pumped solid state laser at 355 nm. Proc SPIE 2002;4830:206-211.
48. Mwenifumbo S, Morris ND, Li M, Soboyejo WO. An Investigation of Nano-Second UV Laser Processing Parameters on Surface Micro-Groove Geometry and Microstructure in Ti6Al-4V. In: Seal S, editor. Surface Engineering in Materials Science. II. San Diego: TMS (ISBN 0-87339-537-9); 2003. pp 141-150.
49. Mwenifumbo S. Cell/surface interactions and adhesion on biomedical and biomems surfaces: Effects of laser microtexturing and titanium coatings, Master's thesis of Princeton University, 2004. pp 41-56.
50. Ask M, Lausmaa J, Kasemo B. Preparation and surface spectroscopic characterization of oxide films on Ti-6Al-4V. Appl Surf Sci 1988;35:283-301.
51. Gristina. Biomaterial-centered infection, microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. Science 1987;237:1588-1595.
52. Hall W, Hammond C. Fracture toughness and crack propagation in titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng 1978;32:241-253.
53. Carpinter, editor. Handbook of Fatigue Crack Propagation in Metallic Structures. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1994. pp 81-321
54. Dubey S, Soboyejo ABO, Soboyejo WO. An investigation of the effects of stress ratio and crack closure on the micromechanisms of fatigue crack growth in Ti-6Al-4V. Acta Mater 1997;45:2777-2787.
55. Mostardi R, Meerbaum S, Kovacik M, Gradisar I. In Vitro Response of Human Fibroblasts to Commercially Pure Titanium. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;47:60-64.
56. Kohilas K, Lyons M, Lofthouse R, Frondoza C, Jinnah R, Hungerford D. Effect of Prosthetic Titanium Wear Debris on Mitogen-Induced Monocyte and Lymphoid Activiation. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;47:95-103.
57. Lamin M, Warocquier-Clerout R, Legris C, Degrange M, Sigot-Luizard M. Correlation Between Substratum Roughness and Wettability, Cell Adhesion, and Cell Migration. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:99-108.
58. Ruoslahti E, Obrink B. Common principles in cell adhesion. Exp Cell Res 1996;227:1-11.
59. Dee KC, Puleo D, Bizios R. Engineering of materials for biomedical applications. Mater Today 2000;3:7-10.
60. Oakely C, Brunette DM. The sequence of alignement of microtubles, focal contacts and actin filaments in fibroblasts spreading on smooth and grooved titanium substrata. J Cell Sci 1993;106:343-354.
61. Dunn GA, Brown AF. Alignment of fibroblasts on grooved surfaces described by a simple geometric transformation. J Cell Sci 1986;83:313-340.
62. Chehroudi B, Gould TRL, Brunette DM. Effects of a grooved titanium-coated implant surface on epithelial cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:1067-1085.
63. Britland S, Morgan H, Wojiak-Stodart B, Riehle M, Curtis A, Wilkinson C. Synergistic and hierarchical adhesive and topographic guidance of BHK cells. Exp Cell Res 1996;228:313-325.
64. Brunette DM. Fibroblasts on micromachined substrata orient hierarchically to grooves of different dimensions. Exp Cell Res 1986;164:11-26.
65. Kolodney MS, Wysolmerski RB. Isometric contraction by fibroblasts and endothelial cells in tissue culture: A quantitative study. J Cell Biol 1992;117:73-82.
66. Kolega J. Effects of mechanical tension on protrusive activity and microfilament and intermediate filament organization in an epidermal epithelium moving in culture. J Cell Biol 1986;102:1400-1411.
67. Lewin B. Genes VII. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.
68. Clark P, Connolly P, Curtis ASG, Dow JAT, Wilkinson CDW. Topographical control of cell behavior. I. Simple step cues. Development 1987;99:439-448.
69. Zhu X, Chen J, Scheideler L, Reichl R, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Effects of topography and composition of titanium surface oxides on osteoblasts responses. Biomaterials 2004;25:4087-4103.
70. Martinesi M, Bruni S, Stio M, Treves C, Borgioli F. In vitro interaction between surface-treated Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:197-207.
71. Wieland M, Textor M, Chehroudi B, Brunette DM. Synergistic interaction of topographic features in the production of bone-like nodules on Ti surfaces by rat osteoblasts. Biomaterials 2005;26:1119-1130.
72. Kim HJ, Kim SH, Kim MS, Lee EJ, Oh HG, Oh WM, Park SW, Kim WJ, Lee GJ, Choi NG, Koh JT, Dinh DB, Hardin RR, Johnson K, Sylvia VL, Schmitz JP, Dean DD. Varying Ti-6Al-4V surface roughness induces different early morphologic and molecular responses and MG63 osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:366-373.
73. Baharloo B, Textor M, Brunette DM. Substratum roughness alters the growth, area, and focal adhesions of epithelial cells and their proximity to titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:12-22.
74. Park BS, Heo SJ, Kim CS, Oh J, Kim J, Lee G, Park WH, Chung C, Min B. Effects of adhesion molecules on the behavior of osteoblast-like cells and normal human fibroblasts on different titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:640-651.