Hearing speech in music

Noise and Health

Volumn 13, Issue 53, 2011, Pages 277-285

  Ekström, Seth Reino ^a   Borg, Erik ^a  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Hearing impairment; masking; music; normal hearing; speech

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; MALE; MUSIC; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDIOMETRY; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING AIDS; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MUSIC; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79961000611     PISSN: 14631741     EISSN: 19984030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.82960     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Borg E. Physiological and medical effects of noise. Acta Otolaryngol 1981;381:1-68.
2. Nilsson U. The anxiety-and pain-reducing effect of music interventions: A systematic review. AORN J 2008;87:780-807.
3. Kähäri KR. The influence of music on hearing, Dissertation. Dept. of Otolaryngology. Sweden: University of Gothenburg;2002. p.1-73
4. Gustafsson I, Öström A, Johansson J. Mossberg L. The five aspects meal model: A tool for developing meal services in restaurants. J Foodservice 2006;17:84-93.
5. North AC, Hargreaves DJ. The effect of music on atmosphere and purchase intentions in a cafeteria. J Appl Soc Psychol 1998;28:2254-73. (Pubitemid 128183107)
6. Hansson H. Monaurally deaf persons. Sweden: Stockholm University;1993.
7. Davis AC. Hearing in adults. The prevalence and distribution of hearing impairment and reported disability in the MRC Institute of Hearing Research's National Study of Hearing. London: Whurr Publishers; 1995. p.1-1101.
8. Tsaneva L. Masking effect of music upon oral information processing. Centr Eur J Public Health 2003;11:173-5. (Pubitemid 37123235)
9. Rhebergen KS, Versfeld NJ, Dreschler WA. Prediction of the intelligibility for speech in real-life background noises for subjects with normal hearing. Ear Hear 2008;29:169-75. (Pubitemid 351640530)
10. Schlittmeier SJ, Hellbrück J, Thaden R, Vorländer M. The impact of background speech varying in intelligibility: Effects on cognitive performance and perceived disturbance. Ergonomics 2008;51:719-36 (Pubitemid 351593869)
11. Russo FA, Pichora-Fuller MK. Tune in or tune out: Age-related differences in listening to speech in music. Ear Hear 2008;29:746-60.
12. Parbery-Clark A, Skoe E, Lam C, Kraus, N. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise. Ear Hear 2009;30:653-61.
13. Bronkhorst AW. The cocktail party phenomenon: A review of research on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions. Acustica 2000;86:117-28. (Pubitemid 34103984)
14. Hagerman B. Clinical measurement of speech reception thresholds in noise. Scand Audiol 1984;13:57-63. (Pubitemid 14155880)
15. Dreschler WA, Verschuure H, Ludvigsen C, Westermann S. ICRA noises: Artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology. Audiology 2001;40:148-57 (Pubitemid 32674146)
16. Borg E, Wilson M, Samuelsson E. Towards an ecological audiology, stereophonic listening chamber and acoustic environmental tests. Scand Audiol 1998;17:195-206. (Pubitemid 28497886)
17. Hawkins DB, Montgomery AA, Mueller HG, Sedge RK. Assessment of speech intelligibility by hearing-impaired listeners. In: Berglund B, Karlsson J, Lindvall T, editors. Noise as a Public Health Problem. Vol 2. Stockholm, Sweden. Swedish Council for building research; 1988. p. 241-6.
18. Hygge S, Rönnberg J, Larsby B, Arlinger, S. Normal-Hearing and Hearing-impaired subjects' ability to just follow conversation in competing speech, reversed speech, and noise backgrounds. J Speech Hear Res 1992;35:208-15.
19. Rhebergen KS, Versfeld NJ, Dreschler WA. Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise. J Acoust Soc Am 2006;120:3988-97. (Pubitemid 44888094)
20. Lidén G. Speech audiometry. An experimental and clinical study with Swedish language material. Acta Otolaryngol 1954;114:1-145.
21. Rhebergen KS, Versfeld NJ, Dreschler.WA. Learning effect observed for the speech reception threshold in interrupted noise with normal hearing listeners. Int J Audiol 2008b;47:185-8. (Pubitemid 351499630)
22. Larsby B, Arlinger S. Speech recognition and just-follow-conversation tasks for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with different maskers. Audiology 1994;33:165-76.
23. Houtgast T, Festen JM. On the auditory and cognitive functions that may explain an individual's elevation of the speech reception threshold in noise, Int J Audiol 2008;47:287-95. (Pubitemid 351998864)
24. Carhart R, Tillman TW. Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses. Arch Otolaryngol 1970;91:273-9.
25. de Maré G, Rösler G. [Investigations on the masking effect in conductive impairment and middle ear impairment]. Acta Otolaryngol 1950;38:179-90.
26. Wagener KC, Brand T. Kollmeier B. The role of silent intervals for sentence intelligibility in fluctuating noise in hearing impaired listeners. Int J Audiol 2006;45:26-33. (Pubitemid 41780310)
27. Borg E, Bergkvist C, Gustafsson D. Self-masking during vocalization. Normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2009;125:3871-81.
28. Ternström S. Hearing myself with others: Sound levels in choral performance with separation of one's own voice from the rest of the choir. J Voice 1994;8:293-302. (Pubitemid 24356503)