Towards an ecological audiology: Stereophonic listening chamber and acoustic environmental tests

Scandinavian Audiology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 195-206

  Borg, Erik ^a   Wilson, Mats ^b   Samuelsson, Eva ^b  

^a ÖREBRO MEDICAL CENTRE HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Acoustics; Audiometry; Directional hearing; Hearing; Hearing aid; Hearing loss; Speech in noise

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPARATIVE TOXICOLOGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECTIONAL HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND DETECTION;

ACOUSTICS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDIOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; HEARING; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; NOISE; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031736067     PISSN: 01050397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/010503998420496     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Colburn HS, Barker MA, Milner P. Free-field tests of hearing-impaired listeners: early results. Binaural effects in normal and impaired hearing. Scand Audiol 1982; 11 (Suppl 15): 123-33.
2. Cox RM, Alexander GC, Gilmore C. Objective and self-report measures of hearing aid benefit. In: Studebaker GA, Bess FH, Beck LB, eds. The Vanderbilt Hearing-Aid Report II. Parkton, MD: York Press, 1991; 201-13.
3. Davis D. The LEDE concept. Audio Magazine 1987; 15: 48-58.
4. Durlach NI, Thompson CL, Colburn HS. Binaural interaction in impaired listeners: a review of past research. Audiology 1981; 20: 181-211.
5. Hagerman B. Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 57-63.
6. Hansson H. Monauralt döva. Audiologiska, socialpsykologiska och existensiella aspekter. Thesis 1993, Pedagogiska Institutionen. Stockholm's Universitet (in Swedish).
7. Hygge S, Rönnberg J, Larsby B, Arlinger S. Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects' ability to just follow conversation in competing speech, reversed speech and noise backgrounds. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 208-15.
8. Keidser G. The relationship between listening conditions and alternative amplification schemes for multiple memory hearing aids. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 575-86.
9. Larsby B, Arlinger S. Speech recognition and just-follow-conversation tasks for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with different maskers. Audiology 1994; 33: 165-76.
10. Lebo CP, Smith MFW, Mosher ER, Jelonek SJ, Schwind DR, Decker KE, Krusemark HJ, Kurz PL. Restaurant noise, hearing loss, and hearing aids. West J Med 1994; 161: 45-9.
11. Lindblad A-C, Olofsson Å, Hagerman B. Hearing aid fitting using psychoacoustical modulation transfer functions. In: Beilin J, Jensen GR, eds. Recent developments in hearing instrument technology. Copenhagen: Stougard Jensen, 1993; 491-6.
12. Luria AR. Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books, 1966.
13. Marttila TI, Jauhiainen T. Hearing disability assessment in evaluating hearing aid benefit. Scand Audiol 1996; 25: 121-5.
14. Nordlund B. Physical factors in angular localization. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1962; 54: 75-92.
15. Palmer CV, Killion MC, Wilber LA, Ballad WJ. Comparison of two hearing aid receiver-amplifier combinations using sound quality judgements. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 587-98.
16. Peissig J, Kollmeier B. Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise - source arrangements for normal and impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 101: 1660-70.
17. Ringdahl A. Listening strategies and benefits when using a programmable hearing instrument with eight programs. Ear Nose Throat J 1994; 1: 192-6.
18. Sanchez-Longo F, Forster F. Clinical significance of impairments in sound localizations. Neurology 1958; 8: 119-25.
19. Till O, Hagerman B. A renovated anechoic room: some aspects of requirements and measurements. Report TA 121 (Department of Technical Audiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden), 1991.
20. Tonning F-M. Directional audiometry. I. Directional white-noise audiometry. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1970; 69: 388-94.
21. Tonning F-M. Directional audiometry. III. The influence of azimuth on the perception of speech in patients with monaural hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1971; 72: 404-12.
22. Tonning F-M. Directional audiometry. IV. The influence of azimuth on the perception of speech in aided and unaided patients with monaural hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1972; 73: 44-52.
23. Weinrich S. The problem of front-back localization in binaural hearing. Binaural effects in normal and impaired hearing. Scand Audiol 1982; 11 (Suppl 15): 135-45.