The impact of background speech varying in intelligibility: Effects on cognitive performance and perceived disturbance

Ergonomics

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 719-736

  Schlittmeier, S J ^a   Hellbruck J ^a   Thaden, R ^b   Vorlander M ^b  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF EICHSTÄTT INGOLSTADT   (Germany)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auralisation; Cognitive performance; Irrelevant speech; Noise abatement; Office noise; Speech intelligibility

Indexed keywords

CASE BASED REASONING; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; NOISE ABATEMENT; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

AURALISATION; BACKGROUND SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE; IRRELEVANT SPEECH; OFFICE NOISE;

ERGONOMICS;

ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE; ADULT; ARITHMETIC; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DISTRACTIBILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NOISE REDUCTION; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SOUND INTENSITY; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH DISORDER; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; VERBAL MEMORY; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 42649117503     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140130701745925     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (1989) Human performance assessment methods, NATO, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
2. Baddeley, A. D. (1968) A three-minute reasoning test based on grammatical transformation. Psychonomic Science, 10, pp. 341-342.
3. Baddeley, A. (2000) The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, pp. 417-423.
4. Banbury, S. and Berry, D. C. (1997) Habituation and dishabituation to speech and office noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, pp. 181-195.
5. Banbury, S. and Berry, D. C. (1998) Disruption of office-related tasks by speech and office noise. British Journal of Psychology, 89, pp. 499-517.
6. Banbury, S. P. and Berry, D. C. (2005) Office noise and employee concentration: Identifying causes of disruption and potential improvements. Ergonomics, 48, pp. 25-37.
7. Banbury, S. P., Tremblay, S., Macken, W. J. and Jones, D. M. (2001) Auditory distraction and short-term memory: Phenomena and practical implications. Human Factors, 43, pp. 12-29.
8. Beaman, C. P. (2005) Irrelevant sound effects amongst younger and older adults: Objective findings and subjective insights. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, pp. 241-265.
9. Bradley, J. S. and Gover, B. N. (2004) Criteria for acoustic comfort in open-plan offices. Proceedings of the inter-noise 2004, the 33rd international congress and exposition on noise control engineering Prague Czech Republic
10. Bridges, A. M. and Jones, D. M. (1996) Word dose in the disruption of serial recall by irrelevant speech: Phonological confusions or changing state?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 49, pp. 919-939.
11. Buchner, A., Steffens, M. C., Irmen, L. and Wender, K. F. (1998) Irrelevant auditory material affects counting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 24, pp. 48-67.
12. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M. and Provost, J. (1993) Psyscope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25, pp. 257-271.
13. Colle, H. A. (1980) Auditory encoding in visual short-term recall: Effects of noise intensity and spatial location. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, pp. 722-735.
14. Colle, H. A. and Welsh, A. (1976) Acoustic masking in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15, pp. 17-31.
15. Düker, H. and Lienert, G. A. (1965) Konzentrations-Leistungs-Test K-L-T, Hogrefe, Goettingen
16. Donald, I. and Siu, O. L. (2001) Moderating the stress impact of environmental conditions: The effect of organizational commitment in Hong Kong and China. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, pp. 353-368.
17. Ellermeier, W. and Hellbrück, J. (1998) Is level irrelevant in 'Irrelevant Speech'? Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio, and binaural unmasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, pp. 1406-1414.
18. Fried, Y., Melamed, S. and Ben-David, H. A. (2002) The joint effects of noise, job complexity, and gender on employee sickness absence: An exploratory study across 21 organizations - the CORDIS study. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 75, pp. 131-144.
19. Furnham, A. and Strbac, L. (2002) Music is as distracting as noise: The differential distraction of background music and noise on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extraverts. Ergonomics, 45, pp. 203-217.
20. Gover, B. N. and Bradley, J. S. (2004) Measures for assessing architectural speech security (privacy) of closed offices and meeting rooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, pp. 3480-3490.
21. Hellbrück, J., Kuwano, S. and Namba, S. (1996) Irrelevant background speech and human performance. Is there long-term habituation?. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan, 17, pp. 239-247.
22. Hockey, R. (1984) Varieties of attentional state: The effects of environment. Varieties of attention, pp. 449-483. Academic Press, Orlando
23. Hongisto, V. (2005) A model predicting the effect of speech of varying intelligibility on work performance. Indoor Air, 15, pp. 458-468.
24. Jones, D. and Broadbent, D. E. (1979) Side-effects of interference with speech by noise. Ergonomics, 22, pp. 1073-1081.
25. Jones, D. M., Alford, D., Macken, W. J., Banbury, S. P. and Tremblay, S. (2000) Interference from degraded auditory stimuli: Linear effects of changing-state in the irrelevant sequence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, pp. 1082-1088.
26. Jones, D. M. and Macken, W. J. (1995) Auditory babble and cognitive efficiency: Role of number of voices and their location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, pp. 216-226.
27. Jones, D. M., Madden, C. and Miles, C. (1992) Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: The role of changing state. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 44, pp. 645-669.
28. Jones, D. M., Miles, C. and Page, J. (1990) Disruption of proofreading by irrelevant speech: Effects of attention, arousal or memory?. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, pp. 89-108.
29. Jones, D. M. and Tremblay, S. (2000) Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, pp. 550-558.
30. Kahneman, D. (1973) Attention and effort, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
31. Kjellberg, A., Landstroem, U., Tesarz, M. and Soederberg, L. (1996) The effects of nonphysical noise characteristics, ongoing task and noise sensitivity on annoyance and distraction due to noise at work. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, pp. 123-136.
32. Klitzman, S. and Stellman, J. M. (1989) The impact of the physical environment on the psychological well-being of office workers. Social Science & Medicine, 29, pp. 733-742.
33. Knez, I. and Hygge, S. (2002) Irrelevant speech and indoor lighting: Effects on cognitive performance and self-reported affect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, pp. 709-718.
34. Leather, P., Beale, D. and Sullivan, L. (2003) Noise, psychosocial stress and their interaction in the workplace. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, pp. 213-222.
35. LeCompte, D. C. (1995) An irrelevant speech effect with repeated and continuous background speech. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, pp. 391-397.
36. Loewen, L. J. and Suedfeld, P. (1992) Cognitive and arousal effects of masking office noise. Environment & Behavior, 24, pp. 381-395.
37. Lukesch, H. and Mayrhofer, S. (2001) KLT-R: Konzentrations-Leistungs-Test, Revidierte Fassung, Hogrefe, Göttingen
38. Macken, W., Tremblay, S., Alford, D. and Jones, D. (1999) Attentional selectivity in short-term memory: Similarity of process, not similarity of content, determines disruption. International Journal of Psychology, 34, pp. 322-327.
39. Martin, R. C., Wogalter, M. S. and Forlano, J. G. (1988) Reading comprehension in the presence of unattended speech and music. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, pp. 382-398.
40. Matthews, G., Sparkes, T. J. and Bygrave, H. M. (1996) Attentional overload, stress, and simulated driving performance. Human Performance, 9, pp. 77-101.
41. Miles, C., Madden, C. and Jones, D. M. (1988) Levels of interference by irrelevant speech: One, some or many?. Cognition and action in skilled behaviour, pp. 349-359. Elsevier, North-Holland
42. Neath, I. (2000) Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, pp. 403-423.
43. Nemecek, J. and Grandjean, E. (1973) Noise in landscaped offices. Applied Ergonomics, 4, pp. 19-22.
44. Oswald, C. J. P., Tremblay, S. and Jones, D. M. (2000) Disruption of comprehension by the meaning of irrelevant sound. Memory, 8, pp. 345-350.
45. Salamé, P. (1993) The AGARD grammatical reasoning task: A defect and proposed solutions. Ergonomics, 36, pp. 1457-1464.
46. Salamé, P. and Baddeley, A. D. (1987) Noise, unattended speech and short-term memory. Ergonomics, 30, pp. 1185-1194.
47. Sundstrom, E., Town, J. P., Rice, R. W. and Osborn, D. P. (1994) Office noise, satisfaction, and performance. Environment & Behavior, 26, pp. 195-222.
48. Thaden, R. (2005) Auralisation in building acoustics, Logos, Berlin
49. Tremblay, S. and Jones, D. M. (1999) Role of habituation in the irrelevant sound effect: Evidence from the effects of token set size and rate of transition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 24, pp. 659-671.
50. Venetjoki, N., Kaarlela-Tuomaala, A., Keskinen, E. and Hongisto, V. (2006) The effect of speech and speech intelligibility on task performance. Ergonomics, 49, pp. 1068-1091.
51. Vorländer, M. (2003) Auralization in noise control. Proceedings of the inter-noise 2003, The 32nd international congress and exposition on noise control engineering Jeju/Korea
52. Vorländer, M. and Thaden, R. (2000) Auralisation of airborne sound insulation in buildings. ACUSTICA Acta Acustica, 86, pp. 70-76.