Amphetamine-induced incentive sensitization of sign-tracking behavior in adolescent and adult female rats

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 125, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 661-667

  Doremus Fitzwater, Tamara L ^a   Spear, Linda P ^a  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent; Amphetamine; Incentive sensitization; Rats; Sign tracking

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; AMPHETAMINE;

AGE; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EXPOSURE; DRUG SEEKING BEHAVIOR; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; MOTIVATION; NONHUMAN; RAT; REWARD; SENSITIZATION; SIGN LANGUAGE;

AGE FACTORS; AMPHETAMINE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ATTENTION; BODY WEIGHT; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; MOTIVATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79960964086     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: 19390084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0023763     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adriani W., Laviola G. Windows of vulnerability to psychopathology and therapeutic strategy in the adolescent rodent model. Behavioural Pharmacology 2004, 15:341-352.
2. Andersen S.L., Dumont N.L., Teicher M.H. Developmental differences in dopamine synthesis inhibition by (+/-)-7-OH-DPAT. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology 1997, 356:173-181.
3. Andersen S.L., Gazzara R.A. The ontogeny of apomorphine-induced alterations of neostriatal dopamine release: Effects on spontaneous release. Journal of Neurochemistry 1993, 61:2247-2255.
4. Anderson R.I., Spear L.P. Effects of housing conditions on sign-tracking behavior in adolescent and adult female Sprague-Dawley rats. Developmental Psychobiology 2010, 52:692.
5. Anderson R.I., Spear L.P. Autoshaping in adolescence enhances sign-tracking behavior in adulthood: Impact on ethanol consumption. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 2011, 98:250-260.
6. Berridge K.C., Robinson T.E. What is the role of dopamine in reward: Hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?. Brain Research Reviews 1998, 28:309-369.
7. Berridge K.C., Robinson T.E. Parsing reward. Trends in Neurosciences 2003, 26:507-513.
8. Crews F., He J., Hodge C. Adolescent cortical development: A critical period of vulnerability for addiction. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 2007, 86:189-199.
9. Doremus-Fitzwater T.L., Varlinskaya E.I., Spear L.P. Effects of pretest manipulation on elevated plus-maze behavior in adolescent and adult male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 2009, 92:413-423.
10. Flagel S.B., Akil H., Robinson T.E. Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction. Neuropharmacology 2009, 56(Suppl. 1):139-148.
11. Flagel S.B., Watson S.J., Akil H., Robinson T.E. Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to a reward-related cue: Influence on cocaine sensitization. Behavioural Brain Research 2008, 186:48-56.
12. Flagel S.B., Watson S.J., Robinson T.E., Akil H. Individual differences in the propensity to approach signals vs goals promote different adaptations in the dopamine system of rats. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 2007, 191:599-607.
13. Holden J.M., Peoples L.L. Effects of acute amphetamine exposure on two kinds of Pavlovian approach behavior. Behavioural Brain Research 2010, 208:270-273.
14. Holson R.R., Pearce B. Principles and pitfalls in the analysis of prenatal treatment effects in multiparous species. Neurotoxicology and Teratology 1992, 14:221-228.
15. Johnston L.D., O'Malley P.M., Bachman J.G., Schulenberg J.E. Monitoring the future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2010 2011, Retrieved from http://www.monitoringthefuture.org/pubs/monographs/mtf-overview2010.pdf.
16. Mathews I.Z., McCormick C.M. Female and male rats in late adolescence differ from adults in amphetamine-induced locomotor activity, but not in conditioned place preference for amphetamine. Behavioural Pharmacology 2007, 18:641-650.
17. Nance D.M. The developmental and neural determinants of the effects of estrogen on feeding behavior in the rat: A theoretical perspective. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 1983, 7:189-211.
18. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals 1996, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
19. Rasmussen B.A., Unterwald E.M., Kim J.K., Rawls S.M. Methanandamide blocks amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization in rats. European Journal of Pharmacology 2010, 627(1-3):150-155.
20. Rezvani A.H., Levin E.D. Adolescent and adult rats respond differently to nicotine and alcohol: Motor activity and body temperature. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience 2004, 22:349-354.
21. Robinson T.E. Behavioral sensitization: Characterization of enduring changes in rotational behavior produced by intermittent injections of amphetamine in male and female rats. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 1984, 84:466-475.
22. Robinson T.E., Becker J.B. Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration: A review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis. Brain Research 1986, 396:157-198.
23. Robinson T.E., Becker J.B., Presty S.K. Long-term facilitation of amphetamine-induced rotational behavior and striatal dopamine release produced by a single exposure to amphetamine: Sex differences. Brain Research 1982, 253:231-241.
24. Robinson T.E., Berridge K.C. The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews 1993, 18:247-291.
25. Robinson T.E., Berridge K.C. Addiction. Annual Review of Psychology 2003, 54:25-53.
26. Rubinow M.J., Hagerbaumer D.A., Juraska J.M. The food-conditioned place preference task in adolescent, adult and aged rats of both sexes. Behavioural Brain Research 2009, 198:263-266.
27. Scholl J.L., Feng N., Watt M.J., Renner K.J., Forster G.L. Individual differences in amphetamine sensitization, behavior and central monoamines. Physiology and Behavior 2009, 96:493-504.
28. Simon N.W., Mendez I.A., Setlow B. Effects of prior amphetamine exposure on approach strategy in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 2009, 202:699-709.
29. Slawecki C.J., Thorsell A., Ehlers C.L. Long-term neurobehavioral effects of alcohol or nicotine exposure in adolescent animal models. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2004, 1021:448-452.
30. Spear L.P. The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2000, 24:417-463.
31. Spear L.P., Brake S.C. Periadolescence: Age-dependent behavior and psychopharmacological responsivity in rats. Developmental Psychobiology 1983, 16:83-109.
32. Teicher M.H., Barber N.I., Gelbard H.A., Gallitano A.L., Campbell A., Marsh E., Baldessarini R.J. Developmental differences in acute nigrostriatal and mesocorticolimbic system response to haloperidol. Neuropsychopharmacology 1993, 9:147-156.
33. Tomie A. CAM: An animal learning model of excessive and compulsive implement-assisted drug-taking in humans. Clinical Psychology Review 1995, 15(3):145-167.
34. Tomie A., Grimes K.L., Pohorecky L.A. Behavioral characteristics and neurobiological substrates shared by Pavlovian sign-tracking and drug abuse. Brain Research Review 2008, 58:121-135.
35. Uslaner J.M., Acerbo M.J., Jones S.A., Robinson T.E. The attribution of incentive salience to a stimulus that signals an intravenous injection of cocaine. Behavioural Brain Research 2006, 169:320-324.
36. Vanderschuren L.J., Schmidt E.D., De Vries T.J., Van Moorsel C.A., Tilders F.J., Schoffelmeer A.N. A single exposure to amphetamine is sufficient to induce long-term behavioral, neuroendocrine, and neurochemical sensitization in rats. Journal of Neuroscience 1999, 19:9579-9586.
37. Vetter, C. S., & Spear, L. P. (November, 2007). Age-associated trajectories of consumption and body weight gain in pair- and isolate-housed adolescent and adult Sprague-Dawley rats. Paper presented at the International Society for Developmental Psychobiology, San Diego, CA.
38. Wyvell C.L., Berridge K.C. Intra-accumbens amphetamine increases the conditioned incentive salience of sucrose reward: Enhancement of reward "wanting" without enhanced "liking" or response reinforcement. Journal of Neuroscience 2000, 20:8122-8130.
39. Wyvell C.L., Berridge K.C. Incentive sensitization by previous amphetamine exposure: Increased cue-triggered "wanting" for sucrose reward. Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 21:7831-7840.