Effects of acute amphetamine exposure on two kinds of Pavlovian approach behavior

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 208, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 270-273

  Holden, John Michael ^a   Peoples, Laura L ^b  

^a WINONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Acute; Addiction; Amphetamine; Goal tracking; Pavlovian; Rat; Sign tracking

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE; CENTRAL STIMULANT AGENT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EXPOSURE; GOAL TRACKING; MALE; MOTIVATION; NERVE STIMULATION; NONHUMAN; PAVLOVIAN APPROACH BEHAVIOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMOTOR ACTIVITY; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; SENSORY STIMULATION; SIGN TRACKING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; CLASSIFICATION; CONDITIONED REFLEX; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

AMPHETAMINE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CUES; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; GOALS; MALE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

EID: 77951900618     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.11.014     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Berridge K.C., Robinson T.E. Parsing reward. Trends Neurosci 2003, 26:507-513.
2. Brown P.L., Jenkins H.M. Autoshaping of the pigeon's keypeck. J Exp Anal Behav 1968, 11:1-8.
3. Burns M., Domjan M. Topography of spatially directed conditioned responding: effects of context and trial duration. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 2001, 27:269-278.
4. Day J.J., Carelli R.M. The nucleus accumbens and pavlovian reward learning. Neuroscientist 2001, 13:148-159.
5. Domjan M., Lyons R., North N.C., Bruell J. Sexual Pavlovian conditioned approach behavior in male Japanese quail (coturnix coturnix japonica). J Comp Psychol 1986, 100:413-421.
6. Everitt B.J., Dickinson A., Robbins T.W. The neuropsychological basis of addictive behavior. Brain Res Rev 2001, 36:129-138.
7. Hearst E., Jenkins H.M. Sign-tracking: the stimulus-reinforcer relation and directed action 1974, Psychonomic Society, Austin, TX, 49 pp.
8. O'Brien C.P., Childress A.R., Ehrman R., Robbins S.J. Conditioning factors in drug use: can they explain compulsion?. J Psychopharmacology 1998, 12:15-22.
9. Leslie J.C., Boakes R.A., Linaza J., Ridgers A. Autoshaping using visual stimuli in the rat. Psychological Record 1979, 29:523-546.
10. Papini M.R., Brewer M. Response competition and the trial-spacing effect in autoshaping with rats. Learn Motiv 1994, 25:201-215.
11. Purdy J.E., Roberts A.C., Garcia C.A. Sign tracking in cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis). J Comp Psychol 1999, 113:443-449.
12. Robbins T.W. The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine. Psychopharmacology 1978, 58:79-87.
13. Robinson T.E., Berridge K.C. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev 1993, 18:247-291.
14. Simon N.W., Setlow B. Post-training amphetamine administration enhances memory consolidation in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning: Implications for drug addiction. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2006, 86:305-310.
15. Simon N.W., Setlow B. Effects of prior amphetamine exposure on approach strategy in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning in rats. Psychopharmacology 2009, 202:699-709.
16. Taylor J.R., Horger B.A. Enhanced responding for conditioned reward produced by intra-accumbens amphetamine is potentiated after cocaine sensitization. Psychopharmacology 1999, 142:31-40.
17. Taylor J.R., Jentsch J.D. Repeated intermittent administration of psychomotor stimulant drugs alters the acquisition of Pavlovian conditioned approach behavior: differential effects of cocaine, d-amphetamine, and 3,4-methylenedioxymeth-amphetamine (" Ecstacy" ). Biol Psychiatry 2001, 50:137-143.
18. Taylor J.R., Robbins T.W. Enhanced behavioural control by conditioned reinforcers following microinjections of d-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology 1984, 84:405-412.
19. Tindell A.J., Berridge K.C., Zhang J., Pecina S., Aldridge J.W. Ventral pallidal neurons code incentive motivation: Amplification by mesolimbic sensitization and amphetamine. Eur J Neurosci 2005, 22:2617-2634.
20. Tomie A., Aguado A.S., Pohorecky L.A., Benjamin D. Individual differences in Pavlovian autoshaping of lever pressing in rats predict stress-induced corticosterone release and mesolimbic levels of monoamines. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2000, 65:509-517.
21. Tomie A., Grimes K.L., Pohorecky L.A. Behavioral characteristics and neurobiological substrates shared by Pavlovian sign-tracking and drug abuse. Brain Res Rev 2008, 58:121-135.
22. Tomie A., Silberman Y., Williams K., Pohorecky L. Pavlovian autoshaping procedures increase plasma corticosterone levels in rats. Pharmacology Biochem Behav 2002, 72:507-513.
23. Wan X., Peoples L.L. Amphetamine exposure enhances accumbal responses to reward-predictive stimuli in a pavlovian conditioned approach task. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008, 32:1346-1357.
24. Wyvell C.L., Berridge K.C. Incentive sensitization by previous amphetamine exposure: increased cue-triggered " wanting" for sucrose reward. J Neurosci 2001, 21:7831-7840.