Diagnostic value of 3D fast low-angle shot dynamic MRI of breast papillomas

Yonsei Medical Journal

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 838-844

  Son, Eun Ju ^a   Kim, Eun Kyung ^a   Kim, Jeong Ah ^a   Kwak, Jin Young ^a   Jeong, Joon ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Breast MRI; Breast papillomas; Galactography; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST DISCHARGE; BREAST PAPILLOMA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GALACTOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIOLOGIST; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TUMOR LOCALIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PAPILLOMA, INTRADUCTAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 74549208458     PISSN: 05135796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.6.838     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Al Sarakbi W, Worku D, Escobar PF, Mokbel K. Breast papillomas: current management with a focus on a new diagnostic and therapeutic modality. Int Semin Surg Oncol 2006;3:1.
2. Francis A, England D, Rowlands D, Bradley S. Breast papilloma: mammogram, ultrasound and MRI appearances. Breast 2002; 11:394-7.
3. Cardenosa G, Eklund GW. Benign papillary neoplasms of the breast: mammographic findings. Radiology 1991;181:751-5.
4. Piccoli CW, Feig SA, Vala MA. Breast imaging case of the day. Benign intraductal papilloma with focal atypical papillomatous hyperplasia. Radiographics 1998;18:783-6.
5. Pisano ED, Braeuning MP, Burke E. Diagnosis please. Case 8: solitary intraductal papilloma. Radiology 1999;210:795-8.
6. Woods ER, Helvie MA, Ikeda DM, Mandell SH, Chapel KL, Adler DD. Solitary breast papilloma: comparison of mammographic, galactographic, and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;159:487-91.
7. Krämer SC, Rieber A, Görich J, Aschoff AJ, Tomczak R, Merkle EM, et al. Diagnosis of papillomas of the breast: value of magnetic resonance mammography in comparison with galactography. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1733-6.
8. Daniel BL, Gardner RW, Birdwell RL, Nowels KW, Johnson D. Magnetic resonance imaging of intraductal papilloma of the breast. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21:887-92.
9. Oyama T, Koerner FC. Noninvasive papillary proliferations. Semin Diagn Pathol 2004;21:32-41.
10. Dietz JR, Crowe JP, Grundfest S, Arrigain S, Kim JA. Directed duct excision by using mammary ductoscopy in patients with pathologic nipple discharge. Surgery 2002;132:582-7.
11. Carter D. Intraductal papillary tumours of the breast: a study of 78 cases. Cancer 1977;39:1689-92.
12. Haagensen CD, Bodain C, Haagensen DE. Breast carcinoma risk and detection. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1981. p.146.
13. Dupont WD, Page DL. Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. N Engl J Med 1985;312:46-51.
14. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, Polk S, Arena PJ, Fletcher SW. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1089-96.
15. Okazaki A, Hirata K, Okazaki M, Svane G, Azavedo E. Nipple discharge disorders: current diagnostic management and the role of fiber-ductoscopy. Eur Radiol 1999;9:583-90.