Adaptation of the simple or complex nature of V1 receptive fields to visual statistics

Nature Neuroscience

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1053-1060

  Fournier, Julien ^a   Monier, Cyril ^a   Pananceau, Marc ^a,b   Frégnac, Yves ^a  

^a Unite de Neurosciences Integratives et Computationnelles   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CAT; INTRACELLULAR RECORDING; NOISE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRIATE CORTEX; SYNAPSE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BRAIN MAPPING; CATS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEURONS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79960845050     PISSN: 10976256     EISSN: 15461726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nn.2861     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 160, 106-154 (1962).
2. Movshon, J.A., Thompson, I. & Tolhurst, D. Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 283, 53-77 (1978). (Pubitemid 9048097)
3. DeAngelis, G.C., Ohzawa, I. & Freeman, R.D. Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation. J. Neurophysiol. 69, 1118-1135 (1993). (Pubitemid 23118813)
4. Carandini, M. et al. Do we know what the early visual system does? J. Neurosci. 25, 10577-10597 (2005). (Pubitemid 41681906)
5. Movshon, J.A., Thompson, I. & Tolhurst, D. Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 283, 79-99 (1978). (Pubitemid 9048098)
6. Dean, A.F. & Tolhurst, D.J. On the distinctness of simple and complex cells in the visual cortex of the cat. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 344, 305-325 (1983). (Pubitemid 14233214)
7. Emerson, R.C. et al. Nonlinear directionally selective subunits in complex cells of cat striate cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 58, 33-65 (1987). (Pubitemid 17095163)
8. Skottun, B.C. et al. Classifying simple and complex cells on the basis of response modulation. Vision Res. 31, 1079-1086 (1991).
9. Priebe, N.J. et al. The contribution of spike threshold to the dichotomy of cortical simple and complex cells. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 1113-1122 (2004). (Pubitemid 41184452)
10. Chance, F.S., Nelson, S.B. & Abbott, L.F. Complex cells as cortically amplified simple cells. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 277-282 (1999). (Pubitemid 30491300)
11. Tao, L. et al. An egalitarian network model for the emergence of simple and complex cells in visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 366-371 (2004). (Pubitemid 38084256)
12. Rust, N.C. et al. Spatiotemporal elements of macaque v1 receptive fields. Neuron 46, 945-956 (2005). (Pubitemid 40812353)
13. Bardy, C. et al. "Simplification" of responses of complex cells in cat striate cortex: suppressive surrounds and "feedback" inactivation. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 574, 731-750 (2006). (Pubitemid 44101367)
14. Victor, J.D. et al. Responses of V1 neurons to two-dimensional hermite functions. J. Neurophysiol. 95, 379-400 (2006). (Pubitemid 44698943)
15. Albrecht, D.G., Farrar, S.B. & Hamilton, D.B. Spatial contrast adaptation characteristics of neurones recorded in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 347, 713-739 (1984). (Pubitemid 14058536)
16. Ohzawa, I., Sclar, G. & Freeman, R.D. Contrast gain control in the cat's visual system. J. Neurophysiol. 54, 651-667 (1985). (Pubitemid 16217253)
17. Carandini, M. & Ferster, D. A tonic hyperpolarization underlying contrast adaptation in cat visual cortex. Science 276, 949-952 (1997). (Pubitemid 27209093)
18. Sanchez-Vives, M.V., Nowak, L.G. & McCormick, D.A. Membrane mechanisms underlying contrast adaptation in cat area 17 in vivo. J. Neurosci. 20, 4267-4285 (2000). (Pubitemid 30365698)
19. Sharpee, T.O. et al. Adaptive filtering enhances information transmission in visual cortex. Nature 439, 936-942 (2006). (Pubitemid 43292406)
20. Felsen, G. et al. Cortical sensitivity to visual features in natural scenes. PLoS Biol. 3, e342 (2005).
21. David, S.V., Vinje, W.E. & Gallant, J.L. Natural stimulus statistics alter the receptive field structure of v1 neurons. J. Neurosci. 24, 6991-7006 (2004). (Pubitemid 39045456)
22. Yeh, C.I. et al. Stimulus ensemble and cortical layer determine V1 spatial receptive fields. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14652-14657 (2009).
23. Victor, J.D. et al. Laminar and orientation-dependent characteristics of spatial nonlinearities: implications for the computational architecture of visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 102, 3414-3432 (2009).
24. Mata, M.L. & Ringach, D.L. Spatial overlap of ON and OFF subregions and its relation to response modulation ratio in macaque primary visual. J. Neurophysiol. 93, 919-928 (2005).
25. Stryker, M. & Blakemore, C. Saccadic and disjunctive eye movements in cats. Vision Res. 12, 2005-2013 (1972).
26. Carandini, M. & Heeger, D.J. Summation and division by neurons in primate visual cortex. Science 264, 1333-1336 (1994). (Pubitemid 24219085)
27. Crowder, N.A. et al. Complex cells increase their phase sensitivity at low contrasts and following adaptation. J. Neurophysiol. 98, 1155-1166 (2007). (Pubitemid 47435871)
28. Aertsen, A.M. et al. Dynamics of neuronal firing correlation: modulation of "effective connectivity". J. Neurophysiol. 61, 900-917 (1989).
29. Martinez, L.M. & Alonso, J.M. Construction of complex receptive fields in cat primary visual cortex. Neuron 32, 515-525 (2001). (Pubitemid 33082050)
30. Martinez, L.M. et al. Receptive field structure varies with layer in the primary visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 372-379 (2005). (Pubitemid 40300195)
31. LeVay, S. & Gilbert, C.D. Laminar patterns of geniculocortical projection in the cat. Brain Res. 113, 1-19 (1976).
32. Lesica, N.A. et al. Adaptation to stimulus contrast and correlations during natural visual stimulation. Neuron 55, 479-491 (2007). (Pubitemid 47126270)
33. Smirnakis, S.M. et al. Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale. Nature 386, 69-73 (1997). (Pubitemid 27130921)
34. So, Y.T. & Shapley, R. Spatial tuning of cells in and around lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: X and Y relay cells and perigeniculate interneurons. J. Neurophysiol. 45, 107-120 (1981).
35. Sillito, A.M. The contribution of inhibitory mechanisms to the receptive field properties of neurones in the striate cortex of the cat. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 250, 305-329 (1975).
36. Troyer, T.W. et al. Contrast-invariant orientation tuning in cat visual cortex: thalamocortical input tuning and correlation-based intracortical connectivity. J. Neurosci. 18, 5908-5927 (1998). (Pubitemid 28341367)
37. Lauritzen, T.Z. & Miller, K.D. Different roles for simple-cell and complex-cell inhibition in V1. J. Neurosci. 23, 10201-10213 (2003). (Pubitemid 37444596)
38. Hirsch, J.A. et al. Functionally distinct inhibitory neurons at the first stage of visual cortical processing. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 1300-1308 (2003). (Pubitemid 37485124)
39. Liu, B.H. et al. Visual receptive field structure of cortical inhibitory neurons revealed by two-photon imaging guided recording. J. Neurosci. 29, 10520-10532 (2009).
40. Debanne, D., Shulz, D.E. & Fregnac, Y. Activity-dependent regulation of "on" and "off" responses in cat visual cortical receptive fields. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 508, 523-548 (1998). (Pubitemid 28203966)
41. Nauhaus, I. et al. Stimulus contrast modulates functional connectivity in visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 70-76 (2009).
42. Müller, J.R. et al. Rapid adaptation in visual cortex to the structure of images. Science 285, 1405-1408 (1999). (Pubitemid 29411673)
43. Felsen, G. et al. Dynamic modification of cortical orientation tuning mediated by recurrent connections. Neuron 36, 945-954 (2002). (Pubitemid 35447865)
44. Nagel, K.I. & Doupe, A.J. Temporal processing and adaptation in the songbird auditory forebrain. Neuron 51, 845-859 (2006). (Pubitemid 44374913)
45. Maravall, M. et al. Shifts in coding properties and maintenance of information transmission during adaptation in barrel cortex. PLoS Biol. 5, e19 (2007).
46. Higley, M.J. & Contreras, D. Frequency adaptation modulates spatial integration of sensory responses in the rat whisker system. J. Neurophysiol. 97, 3819-3824 (2007). (Pubitemid 47084792)
47. Brenner, N., Bialek, W. & de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. Adaptive rescaling maximizes information transmission. Neuron 26, 695-702 (2000).
48. Wainwright, M.J. Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission. Vision Res. 39, 3960-3974 (1999). (Pubitemid 29378319)
49. Westwick, D.T. & Kearney, R.E. Identification of Nonlinear Physiological Systems (Wiley-IEEE, 2003).