Spatial overlap of ON and OFF subregions and its relation to response modulation ratio in macaque primary visual cortex

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 919-928

  Mata, Mario L ^a,b   Ringach, Dario L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN NERVE CELL; FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY; MACACA; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NERVE POTENTIAL; NEUROMODULATION; NOISE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; SPIKE WAVE; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL CORTEX;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; BRAIN MAPPING; MACACA FASCICULARIS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 12544256899     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00668.2004     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abbott LF and Chance FS. Rethinking the taxonomy of visual neurons. Nat Neurosci 5: 391-392, 2002.
2. Bell AJ and Sejnowski TJ. The "independent components" of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Res 37: 3327-3338, 1997.
3. Cai D, DeAngelis GC, and Freeman RD. Spatiotemporal receptive field organization in the lateral geniculate nucleus of cats and kittens. J Neurophysiol 78: 1045-1061, 1997.
4. Chance FS, Nelson SB, and Abbott LF. Complex cells as cortically amplified simple cells. Nat Neurosci 2: 277-282, 1999.
5. Conway BR and Livingstone MS. Space-time maps and two-bar interactions of different classes of direction-selective cells in macaque V-1. J Neurophysiol 89: 2726-2742, 2003.
6. De Valois KK, De Valois RL, and Yund EW. Responses of striate cortex cells to grating and checkerboard patterns. J Physiol 291: 483-505, 1979.
7. De Valois RL, Albrecht DG, and Thorell LG.Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Res 22: 545-559, 1982.
8. Dean AF and Tolhurst DJ. On the distinctness of simple and complex cells in the visual cortex of the cat. J Physiol 344: 305-325, 1983.
9. DeAngelis GC, Ghose GM, Ohzawa I, and Freeman RD. Functional micro-organization of primary visual cortex: receptive field analysis of nearby neurons. J Neurosci 19: 4046-4064, 1999.
10. Ferster D. Spatially opponent excitation and inhibition in simple cells of the cat visual cortex. J Neurosci 8: 1172-1180, 1988.
11. Haralick RM and Shapiro LG. Computer and Robot Vision. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, vol. 1, 1992.
12. Heggelund P. Quantitative studies of the discharge field of single cells in cat striate cortex. J Physiol 373: 277-292, 1986a.
13. Heggelund P. Quantitative studies of enhancement and suppression zones in the receptive field of simple cells in cat striate cortex. J Physiol 373: 293-310, 1986b.
14. Henry GH. Receptive field classes of cells in the striate cortex of the cat. Brain Res 133: 1-28, 1977.
15. Hirsch JA. Synaptic physiology and receptive field structure in the early visual pathway of the cat. Cereb. Cortex 13: 1363-1369, 2003.
16. Hirsch JA, Martinez LM, Alonso JM, Desai K, Pillai C, and Pierre C. Synaptic physiology of the flow of information in the cat's visual cortex in vivo. J Physiol 540: 335-350, 2002.
17. Hoyer PO and Hyvarinen A. A multi-layer sparse coding network learns contour coding from natural images. Vision Res 42: 1593-1605, 2002.
18. Hubel DH and Wiesel TN. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol 160: 106-154, 1962.
19. Hubel DH and Wiesel TN. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol 195: 215-243, 1968.
20. Hurri J and Hyvarinen A. Simple-cell-like receptive fields maximize temporal coherence in natural video. Neural Comput 15: 663-691, 2003.
21. Hyvarinen A and Hoyer PO. A two-layer sparse coding model learns simple and complex cell receptive fields and topography from natural images. Vision Res 41: 2413-2423, 2001.
22. Jones JP and Palmer LA. The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 58: 1187-1211, 1987.
23. Jones JP, Stepnoski A, and Palmer LA. The two-dimensional spectral structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 58: 1212-1232, 1987.
24. Kagan I, Gur M, and Snodderly DM. Spatial organization of receptive fields in V1 neurons of alert monkeys: comparison with responses to gratings. J Neurophysiol 88: 2557-2574, 2003.
25. Kulikowski JJ and Bishop PO. Fourier analysis and spatial representation in the visual cortex. Experientia 37: 160-163, 1981.
26. Maffei L and Fiorentini A. The visual cortex as a spatial frequency analyser. Vision Res 13: 1255-1267, 1973.
27. Maske R, Yamane S, and Bishop PO. Simple and B-cells in cat striate cortex. Complementarity of responses to moving light and dark bars. J Neurophysiol 53: 670-685, 1985.
28. Mechler F and Ringach DL. On the classification of simple and complex cells. Vision Res 42: 1017-1033, 2002.
29. Movshon JA, Thompson ID, and Tolhurst DJ. Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol 283: 79-99, 1978a.
30. Movshon JA, Thompson ID, and Tolhurst DJ. Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol 283: 53-77, 1978b.
31. Olshausen BA. Sparse codes and spikes. In: Probabilistic Models of the Brain: Perception and Neural Function, edited by Rao RPN, Olshausen BA, and Lewicki MS. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001, p. 257-272.
32. Olshausen BA and Field DJ. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature 381: 607-609, 1996.
33. Palmer LA and Davis TL. Receptive-field structure in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 46: 260-276, 1981.
34. Priebe N, Mechler F, Carandini M, and Ferster D. The contribution of the action potential threshold to the dichotomy between simple V1 simple and complex cells. Nat Neurosci 7: 1113-1122, 2004.
35. Rao RP and Ballard DH. Dynamic model of visual recognition predicts neural response properties in the visual cortex. Neural Comput 9: 721-63, 1997.
36. Rao RP and Ballard DH. Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nat Neurosci 2: 79-87, 1999.
37. Ringach DL. Mapping receptive fields in visual cortex. J Physiol 558: 717-728, 2004.
38. Ringach DL, Bredfeldt CE, Shapley RM, and Hawken MJ. Suppression of neural responses to nonoptimal stimuli correlates with tuning selectivity in macaque V1. J Neurophysiol 87: 1018-1027, 2002a.
39. Ringach DL, Shapley RM, and Hawken MJ. Orientation selectivity in macaque v1: diversity and laminar dependence. J Neurosci 22: 5639-5651, 2002b.
40. Schiller PH, Finlay BL, and Volman SF. Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. III. Spatial frequency. J Neurophysiol 39: 1334-1351, 1976a.
41. Schiller PH, Finlay BL, and Volman SF. Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. II. Orientation specificity and ocular dominance. J Neurophysiol 39: 1320-1333, 1976b.
42. Schiller PH, Finlay BL, and Volman SF. Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. I. Spatiotemporal organization of receptive fields. J Neurophysiol 39: 1288-1319, 1976c.
43. Simoncelli EP and Olshausen BA. Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annu Rev Neurosci 24: 1193-1216, 2001.
44. Simoncelli EP, Pillow J, Paninski L, and Schwartz O. Characterization of neural responses with stochastic stimuli. In: The Cognitive Neurosciences, edited by Gazzaniga, M. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2004, chapt. 23.
45. Skottun BC, De Valois RL, Grosof DH, Movshon JA, Albrecht DG, and Bonds AB. Classifying simple and complex cells on the basis of response modulation. Vision Res 31: 1079-1086, 1991.
46. Spitzer H and Hochstein S. A complex-cell receptive-field model. J Neurophysiol 53: 1266-1286, 1985a.
47. Spitzer H and Hochstein S. Simple- and complex-cell response dependences on stimulation parameters. J Neurophysiol 53: 1244-1265, 1985b.
48. Spitzer H and Hochstein S. Complex-cell receptive field models. Prog Neurobiol 31: 285-309, 1988.
49. Tao L, Shelley M, McLaughlin D, and Shapley R. An egalitarian network model for the emergence of simple and complex cells in visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 366-371, 2004.