Erratum: Responses of V1 neurons to two-dimensional hermite functions (Journal of Neurophysiology (January 2006) 95, (379-400) DOI: 10.1152/jn.00498.2005);Responses of V1 neurons to two-dimensional hermite functions

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 95, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 379-400

  Victor, Jonathan D ^a   Mechler, Ferenc ^a   Repucci, Michael A ^a,c   Purpura, Keith P ^a   Sharpee, Tatyana ^b  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CAT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ENERGY; LINEAR SYSTEM; MONKEY; NERVE CELL; NERVE FUNCTION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; POSITIVE FEEDBACK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VIGNETTE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION; ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MACACA; METHODOLOGY; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SENSORY NERVE CELL; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; VISUAL FIELD;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; CATS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FORM PERCEPTION; MACACA; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS, AFFERENT; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33644792564     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00517.2006     Document Type: Erratum

References (102)

1. Abramowitz M and Stegun IA. Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, 1964 [reprint, New York: Dover, 1970].
2. Adelson EH and Bergen JR. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am A 2: 284-299, 1985.
3. Albright TD and Stoner GR. Contextual influences on visual processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 25: 339-379, 2002.
4. Anderson JS, Lampl I, Gillespie DC, and Ferster D. Membrane potential and conductance changes underlying length tuning of cells in cat primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 21: 2104-2112, 2001.
5. Aronov D, Reich DS, Mechler F, and Victor JD. Neural coding of spatial phase in V1 of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 89: 3304-3327, 2003.
6. Bair W, Cavanaugh JR, and Movshon JA. Time course and time- distance relationships for surround suppression in macaque V1 neurons. J Neurosci 23: 7690-7701, 2003.
7. Bauer R and Heinze S. Contour integration in striate cortex. Classic cell responses or cooperative selection? Exp Brain Res 147: 145-152, 2002.
8. Blasdel GG. Orientation selectivity, preference, and continuity in monkey striate cortex. J Neurosci 12: 3139-3161, 1992.
9. Bonds AB. Role of inhibition in the specification of orientation selectivity of cells in the cat striate cortex. Vis Neurosci 2: 41-55, 1989.
10. Brincat SL and Connor CE. Underlying principles of visual shape selectivity in posterior inferotemporal cortex. Nat Neurosci 7: 880-886, 2004.
11. Bullier J and Nowak LG. Parallel versus serial processing: new vistas on the distributed organization of the visual system. Curr Opin Neurobiol 5: 497-503, 1995.
12. Cavanaugh JR, Bair W, and Movshon JA. Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons. J Neurophysiol 88: 2530-2546, 2002a.
13. Cavanaugh JR, Bair W, and Movshon JA. Selectivity and spatial distribution of signals from the receptive field surround in macaque V1 neurons. J Neurophysiol 88: 2547-2556, 2002b.
14. Chance FS, Nelson SB, and Abbott LF. Complex cells as cortically amplified simple cells. Nat Neurosci 2: 277-282, 1999.
15. Chen G, Dan Y, and Li CY. Simulation of non-classical receptive field enhances orientation selectivity in the cat. J Physiol 564: 233-243, 2005.
16. Chen HW, Jacobson LD, Gaska JP, and Pollen DA. Cross-correlation analyses of nonlinear systems with spatiotemporal inputs. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 40: 1102-1113, 1993.
17. Conway BR and Livingstone MS. Space-time maps and two-bar interactions of different classes of direction-selective cells in macaque V-1. J Neurophysiol 89: 2726-2742, 2003.
18. Daugman JG. Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. J Opt Soc Am A 2: 1160-1169, 1985.
19. David SV, Vinje WE, and Gallant JL. Natural stimulus statistics alter the receptive field structure of V1 neurons. J Neurosci 24: 6991-7006, 2004.
20. DeAngelis GC, Ghose GM, Ohzawa I, and Freeman RD. Functional micro-organization of primary visual cortex: receptive field analysis of nearby neurons. J Neurosci 19: 4046-4064, 1999.
21. De Valois KK, De Valois RL, and Yund EW. Responses of striate cortex cells to grating and checkerboard patterns. J Physiol 291: 483-505, 1979.
22. Dragoi V, Sharma J, and Sur M. Adaptation-induced plasticity of orientation tuning in adult visual cortex. Neuron 28: 287-298, 2000.
23. Efron B and Tibshirani RJ. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, 1998.
24. Fee MS, Mitra PP, and Kleinfeld D. Automatic sorting of multiple unit neuronal signals in the presence of anisotropic and non-Gaussian variability. J Neurosci Methods 69: 175-188, 1996.
25. Fisher NI. Statistical Analysis of Circular Data. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
26. Freeman RD, Ohzawa I, and Walker G. Beyond the classical receptive field in the visual cortex. Prog Brain Res 134: 157-170, 2001.
27. Gabor D. Theory of communication. J Inst Elect Eng 93: 429-457, 1946.
28. Gallant JL, Braun J, and Van Essen DC. Selectivity for polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in macaque visual cortex. Science 259: 100-103, 1993.
29. Gallant JL, Connor CE, Rakshit S, Lewis JW, and Van Essen DC. Neural responses to polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in area V4 of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 76: 2718-2739, 1996.
30. Gray CM, Maldonado PE, Wilson M, and McNaughton B. Tetrodes markedly improve the reliability and yield of multiple single-unit isolation from multi-unit recordings in cat striate cortex. J Neurosci Methods 63: 43-54, 1995.
31. Hammond P and MacKay D. Differential responses of cat visual cortical cells to textured stimuli. Exp Brain Res 22: 427-430, 1975.
32. Hawken MJ, Parker AJ, and Lund JS. Laminar organization and contrast sensitivity of direction-selective cells in the striate cortex of the Old World monkey. J Neurosci 8: 3541-3548, 1988.
33. Heeger DJ. Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Vis Neurosci 9: 181-197, 1992a.
34. Heeger DJ. Half-squaring in responses of cat striate cells. Vis Neurosci 9: 427-443, 1992b.
35. Hegde J and Van Essen DC. Selectivity for complex shapes in primate visual area V2. J Neurosci 20: RC61, 2000.
36. Hegde J and Van Essen DC. Strategies of shape representation in macaque visual area V2. Vis Neurosci 20: 313-328, 2003.
37. Hegde J and Van Essen DC. Temporal dynamics of shape analysis in macaque visual area V2. J Neurophysiol 92: 3030-3042, 2004.
38. Hevner RF and Wong-Riley MT. Regulation of cytochrome oxidase protein levels by functional activity in the macaque monkey visual system. J Neurosci 10: 1331-1340, 1990.
39. Hirsch JA, Alonso JM, Reid RC, and Martinez LM. Synaptic integration in striate cortical simple cells. J Neurosci 18: 9517-9528, 1998.
40. Hubel D and Wiesel T. Receptive fields of single neurons in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol 148: 574-591, 1959.
41. Hubel DH and Wiesel TN. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol 195: 215-243, 1968.
42. Hubel DH and Wiesel TN. Ferrier lecture. Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 198: 1-59, 1977.
43. Jagadeesh B, Wheat HS, Kontsevich LL, Tyler CW, and Ferster D. Direction selectivity of synaptic potentials in simple cells of the cat visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 78: 2772-2789, 1997.
44. Jones HE, Grieve KL, Wang W, and Sillito AM. Surround suppression in primate V1. J Neurophysiol 86: 2011-2028, 2001.
45. Jones JP and Palmer LA. The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 58: 1187-1211, 1987.
46. Kagan I, Gur M, and Snodderly DM. Spatial organization of receptive fields of V1 neurons of alert monkeys: comparison with responses to gratings. J Neurophysiol 88: 2557-2574, 2002.
47. Klein SA and Beutter B. Minimizing and maximizing the joint space-spatial frequency uncertainty of Gabor-like functions: comment. J Opt Soc Am A 9: 337-340, 1992.
48. Li B, Peterson MR, and Freeman RD. Oblique effect: a neural basis in the visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 90: 204-217, 2003.
49. Lin LM and Wilson HR. Fourier and non-Fourier pattern discrimination compared. Vision Res 36: 1907-1918, 1996.
50. Mahon LE and De Valois RL. Cartesian and non-Cartesian responses in LGN, V1, and V2 cells. Vis Neurosci 18: 973-981, 2001.
51. Marcelja S. Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells. J Opt Soc Am 70: 1297-1300, 1980.
52. McLaughlin D, Shapley R, Shelley M, and Wielaard DJ. A neuronal network model of macaque primary visual cortex (V1): orientation selectivity and dynamics in the input layer 4Calpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 8087-8092, 2000.
53. Mechler F, Reich DS, and Victor JD. Detection and discrimination of relative spatial phase by V1 neurons. J Neurosci 22: 6129-6157, 2002.
54. Morrone MC and Burr DC. Feature detection in human vision: a phase-dependent energy model. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 235: 221-245, 1988.
55. Movshon JA, Thompson ID, and Tolhurst DJ. Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate complex. J Physiol 283: 53-77, 1978a.
56. Movshon JA, Thompson ID, and Tolhurst DJ. Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol 283: 79-99, 1978b.
57. Nowak LG, Munk MH, Girard P, and Bullier J. Visual latencies in areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey. Vis Neurosci 12: 371-384, 1995.
58. Nykamp DQ. Measuring linear and quadratic contributions to neuronal response. Network 14: 673-702, 2003.
59. Ohzawa I, Sclar G, and Freeman RD. Contrast gain control in the cat visual cortex. Nature 298: 266-268, 1982.
60. Ohzawa I, Sclar G, and Freeman RD. Contrast gain control in the cat's visual system. J Neurophysiol 54: 651-667, 1985.
61. Olshausen B and Field D. What is the other 85% of V1 doing? In: Problems in Systems Neuroscience, edited by Sejnowski T and van Hemmen L. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press, 2004.
62. Olshausen BA and Field DJ. Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: a strategy employed by V1? Vision Res 37: 3311-3325, 1997.
63. Palmer LA and Davis TL. Receptive-field structure in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 46: 260-276, 1981.
64. Pollen DA, Gaska JP, and Jacobson LD. Responses of simple and complex cells to compound sine-wave gratings. Vision Res 28: 25-39, 1988.
65. Purpura KP, Victor JD, and Katz E. Striate cortex extracts higher-order spatial correlations from visual textures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 8482-8486, 1994.
66. Reich DS. Information Encoding by Individual Neurons and Groups of Neurons in the Primary Visual Cortex. New York: Rockefeller Univ. Press, 2000.
67. Reid RC, Victor JD, and Shapley RM. Broadband temporal stimuli decrease the integration time of neurons in cat striate cortex. Vis Neurosci 9: 39-45, 1992.
68. Reid RC, Victor JD, and Shapley RM. The use of m-sequences in the analysis of visual neurons: linear receptive field properties. Vis Neurosci 14: 1015-1027, 1997.
69. Ringach DL. Spatial structure and symmetry of simple-cell receptive fields in macaque primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 88: 455-463, 2002.
70. Ringach DL, Hawken MJ, and Shapley R. Dynamics of orientation tuning in macaque primary visual cortex. Nature 387: 281-284, 1997a.
71. Ringach DL, Hawken MJ, and Shapley R. Receptive field structure of neurons in monkey primary visual cortex revealed by stimulation with natural image sequences. J Vis 2: 12-24, 2002.
72. Ringach DL, Sapiro G, and Shapley R. A subspace reverse-correlation technique for the study of visual neurons. Vision Res 37: 2455-2464, 1997b.
73. Rust NC, Schwartz O, Movshon JA, and Simoncelli EP. Spatiotemporal elements of macaque v1 receptive fields. Neuron 46: 945-956, 2005.
74. Rust NC, Schwartz O, Simoncelli EP, and Movshon JA. An analysis of spike-triggered covariance reveals suppressive mechanisms of directional selectivity in macaque V1 neurons. Program No. 229.10. 2003 Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience, Online, 2003.
75. Sahani M, Pezaris JS, and Andersen RA. On the separation of signals from neighboring cells in tetrode recordings. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by Jordan MI, Kearns MJ, and Solla SA. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.
76. Sceniak MP, Hawken MJ, and Shapley R. Contrast-dependent changes in spatial frequency tuning of macaque V1 neurons: effects of a changing receptive field size. J Neurophysiol 88: 1363-1373, 2002.
77. Sceniak MP, Ringach DL, Hawken MJ, and Shapley R. Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons. Nat Neurosci 2: 733-739, 1999.
78. Shapley R. A new view of the primary visual cortex. Neural Networks 17: 615-623, 2004.
79. Shapley R, Hawken M, and Ringach DL. Dynamics of orientation selectivity in the primary visual cortex and the importance of cortical inhibition. Neuron 38: 689-699, 2003.
80. Sharpee T, Rust NC, and Bialek W. Analyzing neural responses to natural signals: maximally informative dimensions. Neural Comput 16: 223-250, 2004.
81. Simoncelli E, Paninski L, Pillow J, and Schwartz O. Characterization of neural responses with stochastic stimuli. In: The Cognitive Neurosciences (3rd ed.), edited by Gazzaniga M. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004, p. 327-338.
82. Sirovich L and Uglesich R. The organization of orientation and spatial frequency in primary visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 16941-16946, 2004.
83. Skottun BC, De Valois RL, Grosof DH, Movshon JA, Albrecht DG, and Bonds AB. Classifying simple and complex cells on the basis of response modulation. Vision Res 31: 1079-1086, 1991b.
84. Skottun BC, Grosof DH, and De Valois RL. On the responses of simple and complex cells to random dot patterns. Vision Res 31: 43-46, 1991a.
85. Smith MA, Bair W, and Movshon JA. Signals in macaque striate cortical neurons that support the perception of glass patterns. J Neurosci 22: 8334-8345, 2002.
86. Smyth D, Willmore B, Baker GE, Thompson ID, and Tolhurst DJ. The receptive-field organization of simple cells in primary visual cortex of ferrets under natural scene stimulation. J Neurosci 23: 4746-4759, 2003.
87. Somers DC, Nelson SB, and Sur M. An emergent model of orientation selectivity in cat visual cortical simple cells. J Neurosci 15: 5448-5465, 1995.
88. Sompolinsky H and Shapley R. New perspectives on the mechanisms for orientation selectivity. Curr Opin Neurobiol 7: 514-522, 1997.
89. Stork DG and Wilson HR. Do Gabor functions provide appropriate descriptions of visual cortical receptive fields? J Opt Soc Am A 7: 1362-1373, 1990.
90. Sun M and Bonds AB. Two-dimensional receptive-field organization in striate cortical neurons of the cat. Vis Neurosci 11: 703-720, 1994.
91. Tao L, Shelley M, McLaughlin D, and Shapley R. An egalitarian network model for the emergence of simple and complex cells in visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 366-371, 2004.
92. Touryan J, Felsen G, and Dan Y. Spatial structure of complex cell receptive fields measured with natural images. Neuron 45: 781-791, 2005.
93. Victor JD and Knight BW. Simultaneously band and space limited functions in two dimensions, and receptive fields of visual neurons. In: Springer Applied Mathematical Sciences Series, edited by Kaplan E, Marsden J, and Sreenivasan KR. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2003, p. 375-420.
94. Victor JD and Mast J. A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 78: 378-388, 1991.
95. Victor JD, Mechler F, Repucci MA, Purpura KP, and Knight BW. Responses of neurons in cat and monkey striate cortex to two-dimensional Hermite function stimuli. Soc Neurosci, 370.4, 2004b.
96. Victor JD, Repucci, MA, and Mechler, F. Responses to Hermite function stimuli reveal intrinsically two-dimensional processing in cat V1. J Vis 3: 20, 2004a.
97. Vinje WE and Gallant JL. Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. Science 287: 1273-1276, 2000.
98. Vinje WE and Gallant JL. Natural stimulation of the nonclassical receptive field increases information transmission efficiency in v1. J Neurosci 22: 2904-2915, 2002.
99. Wiener N. Nonlinear Problems in Random Theory. New York: Wiley, 1958.
100. Willmore B and Smyth D. Methods for first-order kernel estimation: simplecell receptive fields from responses to natural scenes. Network 14: 553-577, 2003.
101. Yang J and Reeves A. Bottom-up visual image processing probed with weighted Hermite polynomials. Neural Networks 8: 669-691, 1995.
102. Yang J and Reeves A. Visual pattern encoding with weighted Hermite polynomials. Spat Vis 14: 391-412, 2001.