Collaborating for management research: From action research to intervention research in management

Handbook of Collaborative Management Research

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 143-162

  Hatchuel, Armand ^a,b   David, Albert ^a,c  

^a PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^c I’École Normale Supérieure ^*  (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960807733     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781412976671.n7     Document Type: Chapter

References (64)

1. Adler, N., Shani, A. B. (Rami), & Styhre, A. (2004). Collaborative research in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Argyris C. Action science and organizational learning Journal of Managerial Psychology 10 (6) (1995) 20-27 doi:10.1108/02683949510093849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683949510093849
3. Argyris, C., & Schén, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Ayas K. Design for learning and innovation Long Range Planning 29 (6) (1996) 898-901 doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(97)82828-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301%2897%2982828-2
5. Baker C. R. Towards the increased use of action research in accounting information systems Accounting Forum 24 (4) (2000) 366-379 doi:10.1111/1467-6303.00046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6303.00046
6. Bartunek J. Scholarly dialogues and participatory action research Human Relations 46 (10) (1993) 1221-1233 doi:10.1177/001872679304601004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679304601004
7. Baskerville R. L. Myers M. Making IS research relevant to practice: Foreword MIS Quarterly 28 (3) (2004) 329-335
8. Baskerville R. L. Wood-Harper A. T. A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research Journal of Information Technology 11 (3) (1996) 235-246 doi:10.1080/026839696345289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/026839696345289
9. Bjérkman H. Sundgren M. Political entrepreneurship in action research: Learning from two cases Journal of Organizational Change Management 18 (5) (2005) 399-415
10. Burnes B. Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal Journal of Management Studies 41 (6) (2004) 977-1002 doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00463.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00463.x
11. Cassell C. Johnson P. Action research: Explaining the diversity Human Relations 59 (6) (2006) 783-814 doi:10.1177/0018726706067080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726706067080
12. Checkland P. From optimizing to learning: A development for systems thinking for the 1990s Journal of the Operational Research Society 36 (1985) 757-767
13. Coghlan D. Action research in the academy: Why and whither? Reflections on the changing nature of research Irish Journal of Management 25 (2) (2004) 1-10
14. Coughlan P. Harbison A. Dromgoole T. Duff D. Continuous improvement through collaborative learning International Journal of Technology Management 22 (4) (2001) 285-303 doi:10.1504/IJTM.2001.002965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2001.002965
15. David, A. (2002). Intervention methodologies in management research. Paper presented at EURAM Conference, Stockholm, Sweden.
16. David, A., Hatchuel, A., & Laufer, R. (Eds.). (2001). Les nouvelles fondations des sciences de gestion [The new foundations of management science]. Paris: Vuibert Fnege.
17. Davison R. M. Martinsons M. G. Kock N. Principles of canonical action research Information Systems Journal 14 (1) (2004) 65-86 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00162.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2004.00162.x
18. Dickens L. Watkins K. Action research: Rethinking Lewin Management Learning 30 (2) (1999) 127-141 doi:10.1177/1350507699302002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350507699302002
19. Eden C. Huxham C. Action research for management research British Journal of Management 7 (1) (1996) 75-86 doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.1996.tb00107.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.1996.tb00107.x
20. Elden M. Chisholm R. F. Emerging varieties of action research: Introduction to the special issue Human Relations 46 (2) (1993) 121-142 doi:10.1177/001872679304600201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600201
21. Fals-Borda, O., & Rahman, M. A. (Eds.). (1991). Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action research. New York: Intermediate Technology/Apex.
22. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
23. Gustavsen B. Action research and the generation of knowledge Human Relations 46 (11) (1993) 1361-1365 doi:10.1177/001872679304601105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679304601105
24. Halbesleben J. R. B. Osburn H. K. Mumford M. D. Action research as a burnout intervention: Reducing burnout in the federal fire service Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 42 (2) (2006) 244-266 doi:10.1177/0021886305285031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021886305285031
25. Hatchuel A. Towards design theory and expandable rationality: The unfinished program of Herbert Simon Journal of Management and Governance 5 (3/4) (2002) 260-273 doi:10.1023/A:1014044305704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014044305704
26. Hatchuel A. Towards an epistemology of action European Management Review 2 (2005) 36-47 doi:10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500029
27. Hatchuel, A., & Glise, H. (2004). Rebuilding management. In N. Adler, A. B. (Rami) Shani, & A. Styhre (Eds.), Collaborative research in organizations: Foundations for learning, change, and theoretical development (5-21). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., & Weil, B. (2001). From R&D to R-I-D: Design strategies and the management of innovation fields. Paper presented at the 8th International Product Development Management Conference, Enschede, The Netherlands.
29. Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., & Weil, B. (2006). From NPD to NDS: The management of innovation fields. Proceedings of the IPDM conference (Vol. 2, 759-775). Milan: EIASM.
30. Hatchuel A. Molet H. Rational modelling in understanding human decision making: About two case studies European Journal of Operational Research 24 (1) (1986) 178-186 doi:10.1016/0377-2217(86)90024-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217%2886%2990024-X
31. Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (1995). Experts in organizations. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110884517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110884517
32. Heron, J. (1981). Experiential research methodology. In P. Reason & J. Rowan (Eds.), Human inquiry: A sourcebook of new paradigm research. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
33. Huxham C. Vangen S. Researching organizational practice through action research: Case studies and design choices Organizational Research Methods 6 (3) (2003) 383-404 doi:10.1177/1094428103254454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428103254454
34. Jae E. Y. Reconsidering participatory action research for organizational transformation and social change Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change 1 (2/3) (2004) 111-141
35. Kaplan R. S. Innovation action research: Creating new management theory and practice Journal of Management Accounting Research 10 (1998) 89-118
36. Kates S. M. Robertson J. Adapting action research to marketing: A dialogic argument between theory and practice European Journal of Marketing 38 (3/4) (2004) 418-433 doi:10.1108/03090560410518620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560410518620
37. Kidd S. A. Kral M. J. Practicing participatory action research Journal of Counseling Psychology 52 (2) (2005) 187-195 doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.187
38. Koch N. The three threats of action research: A discussion of methodological antidotes in the context of an information systems study Decision Support Systems 37 (2) (2004) 265-286 doi:10.1016/S0167-9236(03)00022-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236%2803%2900022-8
39. Ledford G. E. Jr. Mohrman S. A. Looking backward and forward at action research Human Relations 46 (11) (1993) 1349-1360 doi:10.1177/001872679304601104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679304601104
40. Le Masson, P., Weil, B., & Hatchuel, A. (2006). Les processus d’innovation. Paris: Hermes Science Publishers.
41. Lewin, K. (1948). Action research and minority problems. In G. W. Lewin (Ed.), Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper & Row.
42. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.
43. Lindgren R. Henfridsson O. Schultze U. Design principles for competence management systems: A synthesis of an action research MIS Quarterly 28 (3) (2004) 435-472
44. MacLean D. MacIntosh R. Grant S. Mode 2 management research British Journal of Management 13 (4) (2002) 189-207
45. Marsick V. J. Gephart M. A. Action research: Building the capacity for learning and change Human Resource Planning 26 (2) (2003) 14-18
46. McClintock D. Ison R. Armson R. Metaphors for reflecting on research practice: Researching with people Journal of Environmental Planning & Management 46 (5) (2003) 715-731 doi:10.1080/0964056032000138454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0964056032000138454
47. McCutcheon G. Jung B. Alternative perspectives on action research Theory Into Practice 29 (3) (1990) 144-152 doi:10.1080/00405849009543447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405849009543447
48. McKernan J. Choice and quality in action research: A response to Peter Reason Journal of Management Inquiry 15 (2) (2006) 204-206 doi:10.1177/1056492606288075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1056492606288075
49. McSweeney B. Comment: Action research: Mission impossible? Accounting Forum 24 (4) (2000) 379-391 doi:10.1111/1467-6303.00047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6303.00047
50. Meredith J. R. Raturi A. Amoako-Gyampah K. Kaplan B. Alternative research paradigms in operations Journal of Operations Management 8 (4) (1989) 297-326 doi:10.1016/0272-6963(89)90033-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963%2889%2990033-8
51. Mintzberg H. An emerging strategy of direct research Administrative Science Quarterly 24 (December) (1979)
52. Moisdon, J. C. (1984). Recherche en gestion et intervention [Management research and intervention]. Revue Franeaise de Gestion, September-October.
53. Owen M. Conflict and convergence: The ethics review of action research Journal of Research Administration 35 (2) (2004) 21-30
54. Perriaux, A. S. (1999). Renault et les sciences sociales. Paris: Seli-Arslan.
55. Raelin J. A. Action learning and action science: Are they different? Organizational Dynamics 26 (1) (1997) 21-34 doi:10.1016/S0090-2616(97)90025-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616%2897%2990025-5
56. Reason P. Heron J. Research with people: The paradigm of co-operative experimental inquiry Person Centred Review 1 (1986) 456-475
57. Robinson V. M. J. Current controversies in action research Public Administration Quarterly 17 (3) (1993) 263-290
58. Schein E. H. Process consultation, action research and clinical inquiry: Are they the same? Journal of Managerial Psychology 10 (6) (1995) 14-20 doi:10.1108/02683949510093830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683949510093830
59. Shani, A. B. (Rami), David, A., & Wilson, C. (2004). Collaborative research: Alternative roadmaps. In N. Adler, A. B. (Rami) Shani, & A. Styhre (Eds.), Collaborative research in organizations: Foundations for learning, change, and theoretical development (83-100). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60. Shani, A. B. (Rami), & Docherty, P. (2003). Learning by design: Building sustainable organizations. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
61. Simon, H. A. (1981). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.
62. Thompson F. Perry C. Generalising results of an action research project in one work place to other situations: Principles and practice European Journal of Marketing 38 (3/4) (2004) 401-417 doi:10.1108/03090560410518611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560410518611
63. Torbert, W. R. (1976). Creating a community of inquiry: Conflict, collaboration, transformation. New York: John Wiley.
64. Wilson Hugh N. Towards rigour in action research: A case study in marketing planning European Journal of Marketing 38 (3/4) (2004) 378-400 doi:10.1108/03090560410518602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560410518602