When deliberation divides: Processes underlying mobilization to collective action

Communication Monographs

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 324-346

  Wojcieszak, Magdalena ^a  

^a IE UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

Author keywords

Collective Action Frame; Deliberation; Disagreement; Mobilization; Opinion Extremism; Political participation; Sexual Minority Rights

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960791332     PISSN: 03637751     EISSN: 14795787     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03637751.2011.589459     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Anderson, R., Baxter, L., & Cissna, K. (Eds.). (2004). Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Anderson, R., & Cissna, K. (2008). Fresh perspectives in dialogue theory. Communication Theory, 18, 1-4.
3. Andolina, M., Keeter, S., Zukin, C., & Jenkins, K. (2003). Guide to the Index of Civic and Political Engagement. Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
4. Arbuckle, J. (2007). Amos 7.0 user's guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
5. Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
6. Benford, R. (1993). You could be the hundredth monkey: Collective action frames and vocabularies of motive within the nuclear disarmament movement. Sociological Quarterly, 34, 195-216.
7. Benford, R., & Snow, D. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639.
8. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
9. Buhi, E., Goodson, P., & Neilands, T. (2007). Structural equation modeling: A primer for health behavior researchers. American Journal of Health Behavior, 31, 74-85.
10. Burkhalter, S., Gastil, J., & Kelshaw, T. (2002). A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups. Communication Theory, 12, 398-422.
11. Campaign Against Homophobia. (2007). Situation of bisexual and homosexual persons in Poland (M. Abramowicz, ed.). Retrieved from http://www.kph.org.pl/publikacje/sytuacja-bi-homo-2007-EN.pdf
12. Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Reviews in Political Science, 6, 307-326.
13. Chambers, S., & Kopstein, J. (2001). Bad civil society. Political Theory, 29, 837-875.
14. Chou, C., & Bentler, P. (1995). Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 37-55). London, UK: Sage
15. Conover, P., & Searing, D. (2005). Studying "everyday political talk" in the deliberative system. Acta Politica, 40, 269-283.
16. Conover, P., Searing, D., & Crewe, I. (2002). The deliberative potential of political discussion. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 32, 21-62.
17. Czapiński, J. (2007,). Polacy czujaa{ogonek} głód wspó lnoty. Gazeta Wyborcza. Retrieved from http://wyborcza.pl/1,76842,4476505.htm
18. Deetz, S., & Simpson, J. (2004). Critical organizational dialogue: Open formation and the demand of "otherness." In R. Anderson, L. Baxter, & K. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 141-158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
20. Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56-83.
21. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Gamson, W. (1992a). The social psychology of collective action. In A. Morris & C. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 53-76). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
23. Gamson, W. (1992b). Talking politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24. Graff, A. (2006). We are (not all) homophobes-a report from Poland. Retrieved from http://www.kph.org.pl/czytaj/raporty
25. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: Belknap Press.
26. Hawes, L. (2004). Double binds as structures in dominance and of feelings: Problematics of dialogue. In R. Anderson, L. Baxter, & K. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 175-191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Human Rights Watch. (2007). Poland: School censorship proposal threatens basic rights. Retrieved from http://hrw.org/english/docs/2007/03/16/poland15512.htm
28. Ilnicka, B. (2008). The festival of the rainbow families. Retrieved from http://www.kph.org.pl/component/content/article/51-rodzina
29. Kim, J., Wyatt, R., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk, opinion, action: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication, 16, 361-385.
30. Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. When Deliberation Divides 343
31. Klandermans, B., & Oegema, D. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers, steps toward participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52, 519-531.
32. Krosnick, J. (1990). Americans' perceptions of presidential candidates: A test of the projection hypothesis. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 159-182.
33. Krosnick, J., Booninger, D., Chuang, Y., Berent, M., & Carnot, C. (1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 1132-1151.
34. Larsen, K., Reed, M., & Hoffman, S. (1980). Attitudes of heterosexuals toward homosexuality: A Likert-type scale and construct validity. Journal of Sex Research, 16, 245-257.
35. Mansbridge, J. (1983). Beyond adversary democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36. Mansbridge, J. (2001). The making of oppositional consciousness. In J. Mansbridge & A. Morris (Eds.), Oppositional consciousness: The subjective roots of social protest (pp. 1-20). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Marcus, G., Neuman, W., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38. McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency 1930-1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39. McPhail, M. (2004). Race and the (im)possibility of dialogue. In R. Anderson, L. A. Baxter, & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 209-224). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Mendelberg, T. (2002). The deliberative citizen: Theory and evidence. In M. X. Delli Carpini, L. Huddy, & R. Shapiro (Eds.), Research in micropolitics: Political decisionmaking, deliberation and participation (pp. 151-193). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
41. Mendelberg, T., & Oleske, J. (2000). Race and public deliberation. Political Communication, 17, 169-191.
42. Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London, UK: Verso.
43. Mutz, D. (2002a). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838-855.
44. Mutz, D. (2002b). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96, 111-126.
45. Mutz, D. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46. Mutz, D. (2008). Is deliberative democracy a falsifiable theory? Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 521-538.
47. Nabi, R. (1999). A cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Communication Theory, 9, 292-320.
48. Pinchevski, A. (2005). By way of interruption: Levinas and the ethics of communication. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
49. Postmes, T., Haslam, A., & Swaab, R. (2005). Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 1-42.
50. Price, V., Cappella, J., & Nir, L. (2002). Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion? Political Communication, 19, 97-114.
51. Reykowski, J. (2006). Deliberative democracy and "human nature": An empirical approach. Political Psychology, 27, 323-346.
52. Scheufele, D., & Eveland, W. (2001). Perceptions of "public opinion" and "public" opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13, 25-44.
53. Shrout, P., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
54. Simpson, L. (2008). The color-blind double bind: Whiteness and the (im)possibility of dialogue. Communication Theory, 18, 139-159.
55. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. Morris & C. McClurg Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133-155). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
56. Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
57. Sunstein, C. (2002). Law of group polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy, 10, 175-195
58. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
59. Tajfel, H., & Turner, C. (1986). The social identity of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
60. Thompson, D. (2008). Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 497-520.
61. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
62. Ulbig, S. G., & Funk, C. L. (1999). Conflict avoidance and political participation. Political Behavior, 21, 265-282.
63. Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
64. Visser, P., Krosnick, J., & Simmons, J. (2003). Distinguishing the cognitive and behavioral consequences of attitude importance and certainty: A new approach to testing the commonfactor hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 118-141.
65. Walzer, M. (2005). Politics and passion: Toward a more egalitarian liberalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
66. Wojcieszak, M. (2011). Pulling towards or pulling away: Deliberation, disagreement and opinion extremity in political participation. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 207-225.
67. Wojcieszak, M. (in press). Deliberation reconsidered: What happens when people with extreme views encounter disagreement. Journal of Communication.
68. Wojcieszak, M., & Price, V. (2010). Bridging the divide or intensifying the conflict? How disagreement affects strong predilections about sexual minorities. Political Psychology, 31, 315-339.
69. Young, I. (2001). Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29, 670-690.
70. Zablocki, K. (2007). Surviving under pressure: Working for days of tolerance in Poland. Retrieved from http://www.kph.org.pl/czytaj/raporty
71. Zuwerink, J., & Devine, P. (1996). Attitude importance and resistance to persuasion: It's not just the thought that counts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 931-944.