Deliberative democracy and "human nature": An empirical approach

Political Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 323-346

  Reykowski, Janusz ^a  

^a NONE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Attitude change; Deliberative democracy; Group norms; Political beliefs

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745295350     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: 14679221     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00516.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
2. Bidell, T. R., & Fischer, K. W. (1992). Beyond the stage debate: Action, structure, and variability in Piagetian theory and research. In R. J. Sternberg & C. A. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual development (pp. 100-140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Doob, L. W. (1974). A Cyprus workshop: An exercise in intervention methodology. Journal of Psychology, 94, 161-178.
4. Doob, L. W., & Foltz, W. J. (1973). The Belfast workshop: An application of group techniques to a destructive conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 17, 489-512.
5. Dryzek, J. S., & Braithwaite, V. (2000). On the prospects for democratic deliberation: Values analysis applied to Australian politics. Political Psychology, 21, 241-266.
6. Eurobarometer 62 (2005). Public Opinion in the European Union - Autumn 2004. European Commission.
7. Fischer, K. W., & Silvern, L. (1985). Stages and individual differences in cognitive development. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 613-649.
8. Golec, A. (2002). Konflikt polityczny: Myślenie i emocje. Warszawa: Dialog.
9. Grzelak, J. (1986). Money isn't everything. Differential effects of types of values upon social orientations. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 17, 147-154.
10. Grzelak, J. (1994). Conflict and cooperation. Motivational basis. In G. d'Ydewalle, P. Eelen, & P. Bertelson (Eds.), International perspectives on psychological science, vol. 2. The State of art. New York: Erlbaum.
11. Grzelak, J. (1995). Sytuacyjna zmienność preferencji spolecznych. Kolokwia psychologiczne. Tom 5. Warszawa IP PAN.
12. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
13. Kelman, H. C., & Cohen, S. P. (1979). Reduction of international conflict: An interactional approach. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup conflict (pp. 288-303). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
14. Kelman, H. C. (1997). Group processes in the resolution of international conflicts. Experiences from Israeli-Palestinian case. American Psychologist, 52(3), 212-220.
15. Kelman, H. C., & Fisher, R. I. (2003). Conflict analysis and resolution. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Political psychology (pp. 315-356). New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior (pp. 31-54). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
17. Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development. Volume Two: The psychology of moral development. New York: Harper and Row.
18. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind. "Seizing" and "freezing." Psychological Review, 103(2), 263-283.
19. Machedo, S. (1999). Introduction. In S. Machedo (Ed.), Deliberative politics. Essays on democracy and disagreement (pp. 3-16). New York: Oxford University Press.
20. McCrae, R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3), 3233-3338.
21. McClintock, C. G. (1972). Social motivation. A set of propositions. Behavioral Science, 17, 438-454.
22. Messic, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational basis of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25.
23. Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgments. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
24. Reykowski, J. (2002). The levels of political thinking and political problem solving. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 33(4), pp. 19-30.
25. Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.
26. Rosenberg, S. W. (1988). Reason, ideology, and politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27. Rosenberg, S. (2002). The not so common sense. New Haven: Yale University Press.
28. Rosenberg, S. (2003). Reason, communicative competence, and democratic deliberation: Do citizens have the capacities for effectively participate in deliberative decision-making? Unpublished manuscript. University of California Irvine.
29. Rosenberg, S. (2003a). Restructuring the concept of deliberation. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Philadelphia.
30. Rosenthal, R. (1976). Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Irvingon.
31. Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation. New York: McGraw Hill.
32. Shapiro, I. (1999). Enough of deliberation: Politics is about interests and power. In S. Machedo (Ed.), Deliberative politics. Essays on democracy and disagreement (pp. 3-16). New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Sulkin, T., & Simon, A. F. (2001). Habermas in the lab: A study of deliberation in an experimental setting. Political Psychology, 22, 809-827.
35. Sunstein, C. R. (1991). Preferences and politics. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 20(3), pp. 3-34.
36. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
37. Winter, D. G. (1996). Personality: Analysis and interpretation of lives. New York: McGraw Hill.
38. Winter, D. G. (2003). Personality and political behavior. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Political psychology (pp. 110-145). New York: Oxford University Press.