Follow-up study of the effects of a supplemental early reading intervention on the reading/disability risk of urban primary learners

Exceptionality

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 140-159

  Cartledge, Gwendolyn ^a   Yurick, Amanda ^b   Singh, Angella Harjani ^a   Keyes, Starr E ^c   Kourea, Lefki ^d  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Bluffton University   (United States)

^d EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960715111     PISSN: 09362835     EISSN: 15327035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09362835.2011.562095     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Arnold, M. (2003). Overrepresentation of minority students in special education. Retrieved July 19, 2008 from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3673/is_200301/ai_n9176408
2. Arroyo, A., Rhoad, R., & Drew, P. (1999). Meeting diverse student needs in urban schools: Research-based recommendations for school personnel. Preventing School Failure, 43(4), 145-153.
3. Aud, S., Hussar, W., Planty, M., Snyder, T., Bianco, K., Fox, M., et al. (2010). The condition of education 2010 (NCES 2010-028).Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
4. Beck, I. L., Farr, R. C., & Strickland, D. S. (2003). Trophies. Orlando, FL: Harcourt School Publishers.
5. Berninger V. W., Abbott, R. D., Vermeulen, K., Ogier, S., Brooksher, R., Zook, D., et al. (2002). Comparison of faster and slower responders to early intervention in reading: Differentiating features of their language profiles. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25(1), 59-76.
6. Bursuck, W. D., Smith, T., Munk, D., Damer, M., Mehlig, L., & Perry, J. (2004). Evaluating the impact of a preventionbased model of reading on children who are at-risk. Remedial and Special Education, 25(5), 303-313.
7. Coyne, M. D., Kame'enui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (2001). Prevention and intervention in beginning reading: Two complex systems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 62-72.
8. Coyne, M. D., Kame'enui, E. J., Simmons, D. C., & Harn, B. A. (2004). Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin: First grade reading performance of strong responders to Kindergarten intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 90-104.
9. Coyne, M. D., Zipoli, R. P., & Ruby, M. F. (2006). Beginning reading instruction for students at risk for reading disabilities: What, how, and when. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(3), 161-168.
10. Felton, R. H., & Pepper, P. P. (1995). Early identification and intervention of phonological deficits in Kindergarten and early elementary children at risk for reading disability. School Psychology Review, 24, 405-414.
11. Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37-55.
12. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93-99.
13. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. (2009). Responsiveness to intervention: Multilevel assessment and instruction as early intervention and disability identification. The Reading Teacher, 63, 250-252.
14. Gersten, R., & Dimino, J. A. (2006). RTI (Response to Intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again). Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 99-108.
15. Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Retrieved May 23, 2011 from http://dibels.uoregon.edu
16. Gunn, B., Smolkowski, K., Biglan, A., Black, C., & Blair, J. (2005). Fostering development of reading skill through supplemental instruction: Results for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students. The Journal of Special Education, 39(2), 66-85.
17. Gyovai, L. K., Cartledge, G., Kourea, L., Yurick, A., & Gibson, L. (2009). Early reading intervention: Responding to the learning needs of young at-risk English language learners. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(3), 143-162.
18. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Harris-Murri, N., King, K., & Rostenberg, D. (2006). Reducing disproportionate minority representation in special education programs for students with emotional disturbances: Toward a culturally responsive response to intervention model. Education and Treatment of Children, 29(4), 779-799.
20. Harry, B., & Klingner, J. (2006). Why are so many minority students in special education? Understanding race & disability in schools? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
21. Kame'enui, E. J., Good III, R., & Harn, B. A. (2005). Beginning reading failure and the quantification of risk: Reading behavior as the supreme index. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, N. A. Neef, S. M. Peterson, D. M. Sainato, G. Cartledge, R. Gardner III, L. D. Peterson, S. B. Hersh, & J. C. Dardig (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education: Achievements, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 88-89). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall/Merrill.
22. Keogh, B. K. (2004). The importance of longitudinal research for early intervention practices. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 81-102). Baltimore, MD: Brooks Publishing.
23. Klinger, J. K., & Edwards, P. A. (2006). Cultural considerationswith response to interventionmodels. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 108-117.
24. Mathes, P. G., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Henley, A. M., & Sanders, A. (1994). Increasing stategic reading practice with Peabody classwide peer tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 44-48.
25. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2001). The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved May 23, 2011 from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
26. National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). Status and trends of racial and ethnic minorities. Retrieved October 11, 2010 from http://necs.ed.gov/pubs2007/minoritytrends/tables/table_8_1b.asp
27. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2009). The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved May 23, 2011 from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d09/tables/dt09_123.asp
28. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2010). Percentage of 3- to 21-year-olds in public school receiving services under the Individual with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), by primary disability type: Selected school years, 197- 77 through 2007-08.Retrieved October 11, 2010 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/minoritytrends/tables/table_8_1b.asp
29. O'Connor, R. (2000). Increasing the intensity of intervention in Kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(1), 43-54.
30. Schrank, F. A., McGrew, K. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Technical abstract: Woodcock-Johnson III assessment service bulletin number 2. Itasca, IL: Riverside Printing.
31. Simmons, D. C., Coyne, M. D., Kwok, O., McDonagh, S., Harn, B. A., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2008). Indexing response to intervention: A longitudinal study of reading risk from Kindergarten through third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(2), 158-173.
32. Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2003). Scott Foresman Early Reading Intervention.Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
33. Simmons, D. C., Kame'enui, E. J., Stoolmiller, M., Coyne, M. D., & Harn, B. (2003). Accelerating growth and maintaining proficiency: A two-year intervention study of Kindergarten and first-grade children at risk for reading difficulties. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 197- 228). Timonium, MD: York Press.
34. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.) (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
35. Sweet, R. W. (2004). The big picture: Where we are nationally on the reading front and how we got here. In P. McCardle, & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 13-44). Baltimore, MD: Brooks Publishing.
36. The Nation's Report Card. (2009). Reading: Grade 4 national results. Retrieved October 11, 2010 from http://nations reportcard.gov/reading_2009/nat_g4.asp?tab_idDtab3&subtab_idDTab_6#tabsContainer
37. Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(1), 55-64.
38. Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (2002). Emergent literacy skills, early instruction, and individual differences as determinants of difficulties in learning to read: The case for early intervention. In S. B. Neuman, & D. K. Dickson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
39. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Jaccard, J. (2003). Toward distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as primary sources of difficulty in learning to read: A two year follow-up of difficult to remediate and readily remediated poor readers. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 73-120). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
40. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A. C., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult to remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
41. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Small, S. G., & Fanuele, D. P. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of Kindergarten and first-grade interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(2), 157-169.
42. Wagner, M., & Cameto, R. (2004). NTLS2 data brief: The characteristics, experiences, and outcomes of youth with emotional disturbances. A report from the National longitudinal Transition Study-2. Retrieved February 4, 2007, from http://ncset.org/publications/nlts2/NCSETNLTS2Brief_3.2.pdf
43. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Hasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
44. Yurick, A., Cartledge, G., Kourea, L., & Keyes, S. (2010). Reducing reading failure for Kindergarten urban students: A study of early literacy instruction, treatment quality, and treatment duration. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0741932510365359