A comparison of economic demand and conditioned-cued reinstatement of methamphetamine-seeking or food-seeking in rats

Behavioural Pharmacology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 312-323

  Galuska, Chad M ^a   Banna, Kelly M ^b   Willse, Lena Vaughn ^a   Yahyavi Firouz Abadi, Noushin ^b   See, Ronald E ^b  

^a School of Business and Economics   (United States)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

behavioral economics; demand curve; food; methamphetamine; rat; reinstatement; self administration

Indexed keywords

METHAMPHETAMINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG SEEKING BEHAVIOR; DRUG USE; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ELASTICITY; FOOD INTAKE; MALE; NONHUMAN; RAT; REINFORCEMENT;

AMPHETAMINE-RELATED DISORDERS; ANIMALS; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; CUES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; MALE; METHAMPHETAMINE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; RATS; RATS, LONG-EVANS; RECURRENCE; REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE; SELF ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 79960696741     PISSN: 09558810     EISSN: 14735849     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e3283473be4     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ahmed SH, Koob GR (1998). Transition from moderate to excessive drug intake: change in hedonic set point. Science 282:298-300. (Pubitemid 28487203)
2. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
3. Anggadiredja K, Nakamichi M, Hiranita T, Tanaka H, Shoyama Y, Watanabe S, Yamamoto T (2004). Endocannabinoid system modulates relapse to methamphetamine seeking: possible mediation by the arachidonic acid cascade. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:1470-1478. (Pubitemid 38982239)
4. Baptista MA, Martin-Fardon R, Weiss F (2004). Preferential effects of the metabotropic glutamate 2/3 receptor agonist LY379268 on conditioned reinstatement versus primary reinforcement: comparison between cocaine and a potent conventional reinforcer. J Neurosci 24:4723-4727. (Pubitemid 38668196)
5. Belin D, Jonkman S, Dickinson A, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (2009). Parallel and interactive learning processes within the basal ganglia: relevance for the understanding of addiction. Behav Brain Res 199:89-102.
6. Bickel WK, Madden GJ (1999). A comparison of measures of relative reinforcing efficacy and behavioral economics: cigarettes and money in smokers. Behav Pharmacol 10:627-637. (Pubitemid 30026057)
7. Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST, Hughes JR (1990). Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. I. Functional equivalence of response requirement and drug dose. Life Sci 47:1501-1510.
8. Bickel WK, Marsch LA, Carroll ME (2000). Deconstructing relative reinforcing efficacy and situating the measures of pharmacological reinforcement with behavioral economics: a theoretical proposal. Psychopharmacology 153:44-56. (Pubitemid 32127903)
9. Cantin L, Lenoir M, Augier E, Vanhille N, Dubreucq S, Serre F, et al. (2010). Cocaine is low on the value ladder of rats: possible evidence for resilience to addiction. Plos One 5:e11592.
10. Christensen CJ, Silberberg A, Hursh SR, Huntsberry ME, Riley AL (2008a). Essential value of cocaine and food in rats: tests of the exponential model of demand. Psychopharmacology 198:221-229.
11. Christensen CJ, Silberberg A, Hursh SR, Roma PG, Riley AL (2008b). Demand for cocaine and food over time. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 91:209-216.
12. Cruickshank CC, Dyer KR (2009). A review of the clinical pharmacology of methamphetamine. Addiction 104:1085-1099.
13. Darke S, Kaye S, McKetin R, DuFlou J (2008). Major physical and psychological harms of methamphetamine use. Drug Alcohol Rev 27:257-262.
14. Davis WM, Smith SG (1976). Role of conditioned reinforcers in the initiation, maintenance and extinction of drug-seeking behavior. Pavlovian J Biol Sci 11:222-236.
15. De Wit H, Stewart J (1981). Reinstatement of cocaine-reinforced responding in the rat. Psychopharmacology 75:134-143. (Pubitemid 12228819)
16. Epstein DH, Preston KL (2003). The reinstatement model and relapse prevention: a clinical perspective. Psychopharmacology 168:31-41. (Pubitemid 36851160)
17. Gal K, Gyertyan I (2006). Dopamine D3 as well as D2 receptor ligands attenuate the cue-induced cocaine-seeking in a relapse model in rats. Drug Alcohol Depend 81:63-70. (Pubitemid 41682480)
18. Gonzales R, Mooney L, Rawson RA (2010). The methamphetamine problem in the United States. Annu Rev Public Health 31:385-398.
19. Henry BL, Minassian A, Perry W (2010). Effect of methamphetamine dependence on everyday functional ability. Addict Behav 35:593-598.
20. Hursh SR (1980). Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav 34:219-238.
21. Hursh SR (1991). Behavioral economics of drug self-administration and drug abuse policy. J Exp Anal Behav 56:377-393.
22. Hursh SR (1993). Behavioral economics of drug self-administration: an introduction. Drug Alcohol Depend 33:165-172. (Pubitemid 23286635)
23. Hursh SR (2000). Behavioral economic concepts and methods for studying health behavior. In: Bickel WK, Vuchinich, RE, editors. Reframing health behavior change with behavioral economics. Mahwah, NJ US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; pp. 27-60.
24. Hursh SR, Winger G (1995). Normalized demand for drugs and other reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav 64:373-384.
25. Hursh SR, Silberberg A (2008). Economic demand and essential value. Psychol Rev 115:186-198.
26. Hursh SR, Galuska CM, Winger G, Woods JH (2005). The economics of drug abuse: a quantitative assessment of drug demand. Mol Interv 5:20-28. (Pubitemid 40467772)
27. Kippin TE, Fuchs RA, See RE (2006). Contributions of prolonged contingent and noncontingent cocaine exposure to enhanced reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats. Psychopharmacology 187:60-67. (Pubitemid 43876917)
28. Kitamura O, Wee S, Specio SE, Koob GF, Pulvirenti L (2006). Escalation of methamphetamine self-administration in rats: a dose-effect function. Psycho-pharmacology 186:48-53. (Pubitemid 43668310)
29. Lenoir M, Serre F, Cantin L, Ahmed SH (2007). Intense sweetness surpasses cocaine reward. Plos One 2:e698.
30. Martin-Fardon R, Maurice T, Aujla H, Bowen WD, Weiss F (2007). Differential effects of sigma1 receptor blockade on self-administration and conditioned reinstatement motivated by cocaine vs. natural reward. Neuropsychophar-macology 32:1967-1973. (Pubitemid 47258516)
31. Maxwell JC (2005). Emerging research on methamphetamine. Curr Opin Psychiatry 18:235-232.
32. Meredith CW, Jaffe C, Ang-Lee K, Saxon AJ (2005). Implications of chronic methamphetamine use: a literature review. Harv Rev Psychiatry 13:141-154. (Pubitemid 40967247)
33. Murphy JG, Corriea CJ, Vuchinich RE (2009). Behavioral economics of substance abuse. In: Cohen LM, Collins FL, Young AM, McChargue DE, Leffingwell TR, Kook KL, editors. Pharmacology and treatment of substance abuse: evidence-and outcome-based perspectives. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; pp. 505-528.
34. Nair SG, Adams-Deutsch T, Epstein DH, Shaham Y (2009). The neuropharma-cology of relapse to food seeking: methodology, main findings, and comparison with relapse to drug seeking. Prog Neurobiol 89:18-45.
35. Nevin JA (1974). Response strength in multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav 21:389-408.
36. Orio L, Wee S, Newman AH, Pulvirenti L, Koob GF (2010). The dopamine D3 receptor partial agonist CJB090 and antagonist PG01037 decrease progressive ratio responding for methamphetamine in rats with extended-access. Addict Biol 15:312-323.
37. Parsegian A, Lavin A, Glen WB, See RE (2011). Methamphetamine self-administration produces attentional set-shifting deficits and alters prefrontal cortical neurophysiology in rats. Biologic Psychiatry 69:253-259.
38. Pearce DW, editor (1992). The MIT dictionary of modern economics. 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Reichel CM, See RE (2010). Modafinil effects on reinstatement of methamphe-tamine-seeking in an animal model of relapse. Psychopharmacology 210:337-346.
40. Reichel CM, Schwendt M, McGinty JF, Olive MF, See RE (2011). Extended access to methamphetamine self-administration blocks object recognition memory: relationship with metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 expression in rat cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology 36:782-792.
41. Rogers JL, De Santis S, See RE (2008). Extended methamphetamine self-administration enhances reinstatement of drug seeking and impairs novel object recognition in rats. Psychopharmacology 199:615-624.
42. Roth ME, Carroll ME (2004). Sex differences in the acquisition of IV methamphetamine self-administration and subsequent maintenance under a progressive ratio schedule in rats. Psychopharmacology 172:443-449. (Pubitemid 38650981)
43. Schwendt M, Rocha A, See RE, Pacchioni A, McGinty JF, Kalivas PW (2009). Extended methamphetamine self-administration in rats results in a selective reduction of dopamine transporter levels in the prefrontal cortex and dorsal striatum not accompanied by marked monoaminergic depletion. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 31: 555-562.
44. Shaham Y, Shalev U, Lu L, De Wit H, Stewart J (2003). The reinstatement model of drug relapse: history, methodology and major findings. Psychopharmacol-ogy 168:3-20. (Pubitemid 36851158)
45. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2009). Results from the 2008 national survey on drug use and health: National findings. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
46. Taylor TG, Galuska CM, Banna K, Yahyavi-Firouz-Abadi N, See RE (2010). Response acquisition and fixed-ratio escalation based on interresponse times in rats. J Exp Anal Behav 93:261-267.
47. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2009). World drug report. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
48. Xi J, Kruzich PJ (2007). Black agouti (ACI) rats show greater drug-and cue-induced reinstatement of methamphetamine-seeking behavior than Fischer 344 and Lewis rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 87:90-97. (Pubitemid 46855823)