A confidence-credibility model of expert witness persuasion: Mediating effects and implications for trial consultation

Consulting Psychology Journal

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 129-137

  Cramer, Robert J ^a   DeCoster, Jamie ^b   Harris, Paige B ^a   Fletcher, Lisa M ^a   Brodsky, Stanley L ^c  

^a SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Confidence; Credibility; Expert witness; Testimony delivery skills; Witness preparation

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960629716     PISSN: 10659293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024591     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alcaniz E.B., Caceres R.C., Perez R.C. Alliances between brands and social causes: The influence of company credibility on social responsibility image. Journal of Business Ethics 2010, 96:169-186.
2. Applegate J.S. Witness preparation. Texas Law Review 1989, 68:277-352.
3. Arnold J.A. Mediator insight: Disputants' perceptions of third parties' knowledge and its effect on mediated negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management 2000, 11:318-336.
4. Aron R., Rosner J.L. How to prepare witnesses for trial 1998, West, Danvers, MA.
5. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51:1173-1182.
6. Boccaccini M.T. What do we really know about witness preparation?. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 2002, 20:161-189.
7. Boccaccini M.T., Brodsky S.L., Gordon T. Witness preparation training with real and simulated criminal defendants. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 2005, 23:659-687.
8. Boccaccini M.T., Gordon T., Brodsky Effect of witness preparation on witness confidence and nervousness. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice 2004, 3:39-51.
9. Bornstein B.H. The impact of different types of scientific testimony on mock jurors' liability verdicts. Psychology, Crime, & Law 2004, 10:429-446.
10. Brodsky S.L. Testifying in court: Guidelines and maxims for the expert witness 1991, Washington, DC, American Psychological Association.
11. Brodsky S.L. Principles and practice of trial consultation 2009, Guilford Press, New York.
12. Brodsky S.L., Griffin M.P., Cramer R.J. The Witness Credibility Scale: An outcome measure for expert witness research. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 2010, 28:892-907.
13. Champagne A., Shuman D., Whitaker E. An empirical examination of the use of expert witnesses in American courts. Jurimetrics Journal 1992, 31:375-392.
14. Cooke P., Laczny A., Brown D.J., Francik J. The virtual courtroom: A view of justice. Project to prepare witnesses or victims with learning disabilities to give evidence. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002, 24:634-642.
15. Cramer R.J., Brodsky S.L., DeCoster J. Expert witness confidence and juror personality: Their impact on credibility and persuasion in the courtroom. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 2009, 37:63-74.
16. Cramer R.J., Neal T.M.S., Brodsky S.L. Self-efficacy and confidence: Theoretical distinctions and implications for trial consultation. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 2009, 61:319-334.
17. Cramer R.J., Neal T.M.S., DeCoster J., Brodsky S.L. Witness self efficacy: Development and validation of the construct. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 2010, 28:784-800.
18. Ferrara M.L. The psychology of the voir dire. The Jury Expert 2010, 22:32-41.
19. Finkelman J.M. Juror perception of employment litigation. The Psychologist Manager Journal 2005, 8:45-54.
20. Finkelman J.M. Litigation consulting: Expanding beyond jury selection to trial strategy and tactics. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 2010, 62:12-20.
21. Han P.K.J., Klein W.M.P., Lehman T.C., Massett H., Lee S.C., Freedman A.N. Laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates. Medical Decision Making 2009, 29:391-403.
22. Hosman L.A., Wright J.W. The effects of hedges and hesitations on impression formation in a simulated courtroom context. Western Journal of Speech Communication 1987, 51:173-188.
23. Ivkovic S.K., Hans V.P. Jurors' evaluations of expert testimony: Judging the messenger and the message. Law & Social Inquiry 2003, 28:441-482.
24. Jiang J.J., Klein G., Vedder R.G. Persuasive expert systems: The influence of confidence and discrepancy. Computers in Human Behavior 2000, 16:99-109.
25. Kerrigan P.J. Witness preparation. Texas Tech Law Review 1999, 30:1367-1382.
26. Kovera M.B., Gresham A.W., Borgida E., Gray E., Regan P.C. Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 1997, 82:178-191.
27. Krauss D.A., Lee D.H. Deliberating on dangerousness and death: Jurors' ability to differentiate between expert actuarial and clinical predictions of dangerousness. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry 2003, 26:113-137.
28. Krauss D.A., Sales B.D. The effects of clinical and scientific expert testimony on juror decision making in capital sentencing. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2001, 7:267-310.
29. Li Y., Wang X., Yang Z. The effects of corporate-brand credibility, perceived corporate-brand origin, and self-image congruence on purchase intention: Evidence from China's auto industry. Journal of Global Marketing 2011, 24:58-59.
30. Lindsay R.C., Wells G.L., O' Connor F.J. Mock-juror belief of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses: A replication and extension. Law and Human Behavior 1989, 13:333-339.
31. London H., McSeveney D., Tropper R. Confidence, overconfidence, and persuasion. Human Relations 1971, 24:359-369.
32. Luus C.A., Wells G.L. The malleability of eyewitness confidence: Co-witness and perseverance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology 1994, 79:714-723.
33. Myers B., Arena M.P. Trial consultation: A new direction in applied psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 2001, 32:386-391.
34. Neal T.M.S., Brodsky S.L. Expert witness credibility as a function of eye contact behavior and gender. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2008, 35:1515-1526.
35. O'Barr W.M. Linguistic evidence: Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom 1982, Academic Press, New York.
36. Perloff R.M. The dynamics of persuasion 1993, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
37. Price P.C., Stone E.R. Intuitive evaluation of likelihood judgment producers: Evidence for a confidence heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2004, 17:39-57.
38. Pulford, B., & Colman, A. M. (2005, April). Testing the confidence heuristic: Are confidence communicators more persuasive? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the British Psychological Society, Manchester, United Kingdom.
39. Rifon N.J., Choi S.M., Trimble C.S., Li H. Congruence effects in sponsorship: The mediating role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive. Journal of Advertising 2004, 33:29-42.
40. Rogers R., Bagby R.M., Crouch M., Cutler B. Effects of ultimate opinions on juror perceptions of insanity. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 1990, 13:225-232.
41. Ruva C.L., Bryant J.B. The impact of age, speech style, and question form on perceptions of witness credibility and trial outcome. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2004, 34:1919-1944.
42. Sobel M.E. Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. Sociological methodology 1982, 290-312. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. S. Leinhart (Ed.).
43. Thomas J.P., McFayden R.G. The confidence heuristic: A game theoretic analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology 1995, 16:97-113.
44. Whitley B.E., Greenberg M.S. The role of eyewitness confidence in perceptions of credibility. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1986, 16:387-409.
45. Williams F.P., McShane M.D. Psychological testimony and the decisions of prospective death-qualified jurors. Death penalty in America: Current research 1991, 71-88. American Publishing Company, Cincinnati, OH. R.M. Bohm (Ed.).
46. Yates J.F. Judgment and decision making 1990, Prentice Hall, New York.