Dissipation and distribution behavior of azoxystrobin, carbendazim, and difenoconazole in pomegranate fruits

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Volumn 59, Issue 14, 2011, Pages 7866-7873

  Utture, Sagar C ^a,b   Banerjee, Kaushik ^a   Dasgupta, Soma ^a   Patil, Sangram H ^a,b   Jadhav, Manjusha R ^a   Wagh, Sameer S ^a   Kolekar, Sanjay S ^b   Anuse, Mansing A ^b   Adsule, Pandurang G ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GRAPES   (India)

^b SHIVAJI UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

azoxystrobin; carbendazim; difenoconazole; dissipation; Fungicides; method validation; pomegranate; preharvest interval (PHI); residues

Indexed keywords

AZOXYSTROBIN; DIFENOCONAZOLE; METHOD VALIDATIONS; POMEGRANATE; PREHARVEST INTERVAL (PHI); RESIDUES;

DEGRADATION; EXTRACTION; FRUITS; FUNGICIDES; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; SODIUM;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

1,3 DIOXOLANE DERIVATIVE; AZOXYSTROBIN; BENZIMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVE; CARBAMIC ACID DERIVATIVE; CARBENDAZIM; DIFENOCONAZOLE; FUNGICIDE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PESTICIDE RESIDUE; PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVE; TRIAZOLE DERIVATIVE;

CHEMISTRY; CONFERENCE PAPER; FOOD CONTAMINATION; FRUIT; KINETICS; POMEGRANATE;

BENZIMIDAZOLES; CARBAMATES; DIOXOLANES; FOOD CONTAMINATION; FRUIT; FUNGICIDES, INDUSTRIAL; KINETICS; METHACRYLATES; PESTICIDE RESIDUES; PUNICACEAE; PYRIMIDINES; TRIAZOLES;

LYTHRACEAE;

EID: 79960608932     PISSN: 00218561     EISSN: 15205118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jf200525d     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Maharashtra Pomegranate Growers Research Association, Pune, Maharashtra, India; http://www.pomegranateindia.org/ (accessed on 10th November 2010).
2. National Research Centre on Pomegranate; http://www.nrcpomegranate.org/ research.htm; Indian Council of Agricultural Research: Solapur, Maharashtra, India; (accessed on 10th November 2010).
3. Package of Practices for Diseases and Insect Pests of Pomegranate; http://www.nrcpomegranate.org/Package%20of%20Practices.pdf; Indian Council of Agricultural Research: Solapur, Maharashtra, India; (accessed on 10th November 2010).
4. European Union Pesticide Database, Regulation (EC) No 396/2005; http://ec.europa.eu/sanco-pesticides/public/index.cfm, MRLs updated on 02/09/2010; (accessed on 21st January, 2011).
5. Banerjee, K. Residue dynamics of carbendazim and mancozeb in grape (Vitis vinifera L.) berries Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2005, 87 (1) 77-81 (Pubitemid 41673846)
6. Banerjee, K.; Oulkar, D. P.; Patil, S. H.; Dasgupta, S.; Adsule, P. G. Degradation kinetics and safety evaluation of tetraconazole and difenoconazole residues in grapes Pest Manage. Sci. 2008, 64, 283-289 (Pubitemid 351311144)
7. Kruve, A.; Andrea, L.; Kirillova, J.; Herodes, K. Pesticide residues in commercially available oranges and evaluation of potential washing methods Proc. Est. Acad. Sci. Chem. 2007, 56 (3) 134-141
8. Teixeira, M. J.; Aguiar, A.; Afonso, C. M. M.; Alves, A.; Bastos, M. M. S. M. Comparison of pesticides levels in grape skin and in the whole grape by a new liquid chromatographic multiresidue methodology Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 513 (1) 333-340 (Pubitemid 38624501)
9. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, EPA 712-C-96-183: Residue Chemistry Test Guidelines, Crop Field Trials, 1996.
10. European Commission Decision 2002/657/EC implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. Off. J. Eur. Commun. 2002, L221, 8-36.
11. Thompson, M.; Ellison, S. L.; Wood, R. Harmonized guidelines for single laboratory validation of methods of analysis. IUPAC Technical Report Pure Appl. Chem. 2002, 74, 835-855
12. Horwitz, W.; Albert, R. The Horwitz ratio (HorRat): a useful index of method performance with respect to precision J. AOAC Int. 2006, 89, 1095-1109 (Pubitemid 44972059)
13. Horwitz, W.; Kamps, L. R.; Boyer, K. W. Quality assurance in the analysis of foods and trace constituents J. AOAC Int. 1980, 63, 1344-1354
14. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG 4, EURACHEM CITAC Guide, Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, 2nd ed.; 2000; http://www.measurementuncertainty.org/ .
15. Banerjee, K.; Oulkar, D. P.; Dasgupta, S.; Patil, S. B.; Patil, S. H.; Savant, R. Validation and uncertainty analysis of a multiresidue method for pesticides in grapes using ethyl acetate extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry J. Chromatogr., A 2007, 1173, 98-109 (Pubitemid 350054941)
16. Sarmah, A. K.; Close, M. E. Modelling the dissipation kinetics of six commonly used pesticides in two contrasting soils of New Zealand J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part B 2009, 44, 507-517
17. Gustafson, D. I.; Holden, L. R. Nonlinear pesticide dissipation in soil: a new model based on spatial variability Environ. Sci. Technol. 1990, 24, 1032-1038 (Pubitemid 20381844)
18. Banerjee, K.; Oulkar, D. P.; Patil, S. B.; Patil, S. H.; Dasgupta, S.; Savant, R.; Adsule, P. G. Single-laboratory validation and uncertainty analysis of 82 pesticides determined in pomegranate, apple, and orange by ethyl acetate extraction and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry J. AOAC Int. 2008, 91 (6) 1435-1445
19. Borges, G.; Mullen, W.; Crozier, A. Comparison of the polyphenolic composition and antioxidant activity of European commercial fruit juices Food Funct. 2010, 1, 73-83