Degradation kinetics and safety evaluation of tetraconazole and difenoconazole residues in grape

Pest Management Science

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 283-289

  Banerjee, Kaushik ^a   Oulkar, Dasharath P ^a   Patil, Sangram H ^a   Dasgupta, Soma ^a   Adsule, Pandurang G ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GRAPES   (India)

Author keywords

Difenoconazole; Dissipation; Grapes; LC MS MS; Preharvest interval; Residues; Tetraconazole; Validation

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL CONTROL; DISEASE CONTROL; FOOD SAFETY; FRUIT; FUNGAL DISEASE; FUNGICIDE; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; HARVESTING; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PESTICIDE APPLICATION; PESTICIDE RESIDUE; REACTION KINETICS; VITICULTURE;

ASIA; EURASIA; INDIA; SOUTH ASIA;

ERYSIPHALES; VITACEAE; VITIS;

EID: 39749105874     PISSN: 1526498X     EISSN: 15264998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ps.1524     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. 1 Khan MFR and Smith LJ, Evaluating fungicides for controlling Cercospora leaf spot on sugar beet. Crop Prot 24: 79–86 (2005).
2. 2 Shukla BN, Bhargava PK, Gupta M and Patel RP, Epidemiology and management of soybean rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi). Indian J Agric Sci 75: 150–153 (2005).
3. 3 Reuveni M and Sheglov D, Effects of azoxystrobin, difenoconazole, polyoxin B (polar) and trifloxystrobin on germination and growth of Alternaria alternata and decay in Red Delicious apple fruit. Crop Prot 21: 951–955 (2002).
4. 4 Sharmila AS, Kachapur MR and Patil MS, Field evaluation of fungicides against powdery mildew (Leveillula taurica (Lev.) Arn) of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). J Mycol Pl Pathol 34: 98–99 (2004).
5. 5 Agrochemicals: News. [Online]. The Australian Wine Research Institute. Available: http://www.awri.com.au/agrochemicals/news/?news=25 [20 July 2007].
6. 6 Insecticides Registered Under Section 9 (3) of the Insecticide Act, 1968. [Online]. Available: http://www.cibrc.nic.in/reg_products.htm [28 December 2006].
7. 7 European Commission Decision 2002/657/EC implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. Off J Eur Commun L 221 (17August2002): 8–36 (2002).
8. 8 Horwitz W and Albert R, The Horwitz ratio (HorRat): a useful index of method performance with respect to precision. J AOAC Internat 89: 1095–1109 (2006).
9. 9 Degradation and Sorption Parameters. Chapter 8, PLAP—Monitoring Results May 1999–June 2002. [Online]. Danish Pesticide Leaching Assessment Programme. Available: http://pesticidvarsling.dk/monitor_uk/2002_uk/vap‐results‐99‐02‐8‐uk.html [20 July 2007].
10. 10 OriginPro, Version 7.0. OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA (2002).
11. 11 Australian Wine Research Institute MRL Database. [Online]. Available: http://www.awri.com.au/agrochemicals/mrls [20 July 2007].
12. 12 http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/protection/resources/mrl_pend‐ing_group.xls [20 July 2007].
13. 13 Maximum Residue Limits of Pesticides in the Netherlands. [Online]. Available: http://www.rikilt.wageningen‐ur.nl/vws/index.html [20 July 2007].
14. 14 Commonwealth of Australia Gazette No. 8; 5 August 2003. [Online]. Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Act 1994. Available: http://www.apvma.gov.au/gazette/archive/gazette0308p15.pdf [20 July 2007].
15. 15 Tomlin CDS (ed.), The Pesticides Manual, 13th edition. British Crop Protection Council, Alton, Hants, UK, pp. 304–946 (2003).
16. 16 Chadha KL and Shikhamany SD, The Grape—Improvement, Production and Post‐harvest Management. Malhotra Publishing House, New Delhi, India, pp. 419–421 (1999).
17. 17 Guidance Document on Residue Analytical Methods, SANCO/ 825/00 rev. 6, 20 June 2000. European Union Commission Directorate of General Health and Consumer Protection. www.ec.europa.eu/food/plant/protection/resources/guide_doc_825‐00_rev7_en.pdf [28 December 2007] (2000).
18. 18 Hoskins WM, Mathematical treatment of the rate of loss of pesticide residue. FAO Plant Prot Bull 9: 163–168 (1961).