Context of use as a factor in determining the usability of in-vehicle devices

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 318-338

  Harvey, Catherine ^a   Stanton, Neville A ^a   Pickering, Carl A ^b   McDonald, Michael ^a   Zheng, Pengjun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b JAGUAR LAND ROVER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Context of use; Definition; Evaluation; In vehicle device; Usability

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960599320     PISSN: 1463922X     EISSN: 1464536X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14639221003717024     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Adler, P.S. and Winograd, T.A., 1992. Usability: turning technologies into tools. 1st ed. Oxford: University Press.
2. Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, 2003. Statement of principles, criteria and verification procedures on driver interactions with advanced in-vehicle information and communication systems: draft version 3.0. Washington, DC: AAM.
3. Amditis, A., et al., 2006. Communication and interaction strategies in automotive adaptive interfaces. Cognition, Technology and Work, 8 (3), 193-199.
4. Baber, C., 2002. Commentary: subjective evaluation of usability. Ergonomics, 45 (14), 1021-1025.
5. Baber, C., 2005. Evaluation in human-computer interaction. In: J.R. Wilson and N. Corlett, eds. Evaluation of human work. 3rd ed. London: Taylor and Francis, 357-387.
6. Baldwin, C.L., 2002. Designing in-vehicle technologies for older drivers: application of sensorycognitive interaction theory. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3 (4), 307-329.
7. Barón, A. and Green, P., 2006. Safety and usability of speech interfaces for in-vehicle tasks while driving: a brief literature review. Ann Arbor, MI: UMTRI.
8. Bevan, N., 1991. What is usability? In: 4th international conference on human-computer interaction, 1-6 September 1991. Stuttgart. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
9. Bevan, N., 1995. Usability is quality of use. 6th international conference on human-computer interaction, 9-14 July 1995 Tokyo. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
10. Bevan, N., 1999. Design for usability. 8th international conference on human-computer interaction, 22-26 August 1999 Munich. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Bevan, N., 2001. International standards for HCI and usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55 (4), 532-552.
12. Butler, K.A., 1996. Usability engineering turns 10. Interactions, 3 (1), 58-75.
13. Cacciabue, P.C. and Martinetto, M., 2006. A user-centred approach for designing driver support systems: the case of collision avoidance. Cognition, Technology and Work, 8 (3), 201-214.
14. Chamorro-Koc, M., Popovic, V., and Emmison, M., 2008. Human experience and product usability: principles to assist the design of user-product interactions. Applied Ergonomics, 40 (4), 648-656.
15. Chestnut, J., et al., 2005. A user-based qualitative usability assessment and design support assessment tool. In: SAE world congress, 11-14 April 2005, Detroit, MI. Washington, DC: Society of Automotive Engineers.
16. Commission of the European Communities, 2006. Commission recommendation 2007/78/EC of 22 December 2006 on safe and efficient in-vehicle information and communication systems: update of the European statement of principles on human machine interface. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
17. Cox, K. and Walker, D., 1993. User-interface design. 2nd ed. London: Prentice Hall.
18. Dehnig, W., Essig, H., and Maass, S., 1981. The adaptation of virtual man-computer interfaces to user requirements in dialogs. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
19. Dowell, J. and Long, J., 1989. Towards a conception for an engineering discipline of human factors. Ergonomics, 32 (11), 1513-1535.
20. Dzida, W., Herda, S., and Itzfeldt, W.D., 1978. User-perceived quality of interactive systems. In: IEEE, ed. 3rd international conference on software engineering, 10-12 May Atlanta, GA. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 188-195.
21. ECMT, 1995. Statement of principles of good practice concerning the ergonomics and safety of in-vehicle information systems. Paris: The European Conference of Ministers of Transport.
22. ECMT, 2003. Statement of principles of good practice concerning the ergonomics and safety of in-vehicle information systems. New information technologies in the road transport sector: policy issues, ergonomics and safety. Paris: The European Conference of Ministers of Transport.
23. Endsley, M.R., 1995. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37 (1), 32-64.
24. Fastrez, P. and Haué, J.-B., 2008. Editorial: designing and evaluating driver support systems with the user in mind. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 66 (3), 125-131.
25. Fuller, R., 2005. Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37 (3), 461-472.
26. Gould, J.D. and Lewis, C., 1985. Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. In: P.J. Denning, ed. Communications of the ACM. Vol. 28, New York: ACM, 300-311.
27. Hammond, N., et al., 1983. Design practice and interface usability: evidence from interviews with designers. In: A. Janda, ed. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 12-15 December 1983 Boston, MA. New York: ACM, 40-44.
28. Heaton, N.O., 1992. Defining usability. Displays, 13 (3), 147-150.
29. Hedlund, J., Simpson, H., and Mayhew, D., 2006. Summary of proceedings and recommendations. International conference on distracted driving, 2-5 October 2005 Toronto. The Traffic Injury Research Foundation and The Canadian Automobile Association.
30. Herriotts, P., 2005. Identification of vehicle design requirements for older drivers. Applied Ergonomics, 36 (3), 255-262.
31. Herzberg, F., 1996. Work and the nature of man. 1st ed. London: Staples Press.
32. Hix, D. and Hartson, H.R., 1993. Developing user interfaces: ensuring usability through product and process. 1st ed. Chichester: John Wiley.
33. International Organization for Standardization, 1996. DD 235. Guide to in-vehicle information systems.
34. International Organization for Standardization, 1998. ISO 9241. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-part 11: guidance on usability.
35. International Organization for Standardization, 1999. ISO 13407. Human-centred design processes for interactive systems.
36. International Organization for Standardization, 2001. ISO/IEC 9126. Information technologysoftware product quality-part 1: quality model.
37. International Organization for Standardization, 2003. ISO 17287. Road vehicles-ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems-procedure for assessing suitability of use while driving.
38. International Organization for Standardization, 2006. ISO 202082-1. Ease of operation of everyday products-part 1: design requirements for context of use and user characteristics.
39. Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, 2004. Guideline for in-vehicle display systems, version 3.0. Tokyo: JAMA.
40. Jokela, T., et al., 2003. The standard of user-centered design and the standard definition of usability: analyzing ISO 13407 against ISO 9241-11. In: C.S. de Souza, A. Sànchez, S. Barbosa, and C. Gonzalez, eds. Proceedings of the 1st Latin American conference on human-computer interaction, 17-20 August 2003 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. New York: ACM, 53-60.
41. Jordan, P.W., 1998. An introduction to usability. 1st ed. London: Taylor and Francis.
42. Khalid, H.M. and Helander, M.G., 2004. A framework for affective customer needs in product design. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5 (1), 27-42.
43. Kurosu, M., 2007. Concept of usability revisited. In: J. Jacko, ed. 12th international conference on human-computer interaction, 22-27 July 2007 Berlin. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 579-586.
44. Landau, K., 2002. Usability criteria for intelligent driver assistance systems. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3 (4), 330-345.
45. Lansdale, M.W. and Ormerod, T.C., 1994. Understanding interfaces: a handbook of human-computer dialogue. 1st ed. London: Academic Press.
46. Lansdown, T.C., 2000. Driver visual allocation and the introduction of intelligent transport systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 214 (6), 645-652.
47. Lansdown, T.C., Brook-Carter, N., and Kersloot, T., 2002. Primary task disruption from multiple in-vehicle systems. Intelligent Transportation Systems Journal, 7 (2), 151-168.
48. Lindgaard, G. and Whitfield, T.W.A., 2004. Integrating aesthetics within an evolutionary and psychological framework. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5 (1), 73-90.
49. Llaneras, R.E. and Singer, J.P., 2002. Inventory of in-vehicle technology human factors design characteristics. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
50. Long, J.B., 1986. People and computers: designing for usability. In: M.D. Harrison and A.F. Monk, eds. 2nd conference of the British computer society human computer interaction specialist group. Cambridge: University Press, 3-23, 23-26 September 1986 University of York.
51. Macdonald, A.S., 1998. Developing a quantitative sense. In: N. Stanton, ed. Human factors in consumer products. 1st ed. London: Taylor and Francis, 175-191.
52. Maguire, M., Kirakowski, J., and Vereker, N., 1998. RESPECT: user centred requirements handbook. Loughborough: ESRI.
53. Marcus, A., 2004. Vehicle user interfaces: the next revolution. Interactions, 11 (1), 40-47.
54. Matthews, M.L., et al., 2001. Model for situation awareness and driving: application to analysis and research for intelligent transportation systems. Transportation Research Record, 1779 (1), 26-32.
55. Miller, R.B., 1971. Human ease of use criteria and their tradeoffs. New York: IBM Corporation.
56. Nielsen, J., 1993. Usability engineering. 1st ed. London: Academic Press.
57. Nielsen, J., 2009. Usability 101: introduction to usability [online]. Available from: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030825.html [Accessed: 22 May 2009].
58. Noel, E., Nonnecke, B., and Trick, L., 2005. A comprehensive learnability evaluation method for in-car navigation devices. Washington, DC: Society of Automotive Engineers.
59. Norman, D.A., 1983. Design principles for human computer interfaces. In: A. Janda, ed. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 12-15 December 1983 Boston, MA. New York: ACM, 1-10.
60. Norman, D.A., 2002. The design of everyday things. 1st ed. New York: Basic Books.
61. Norman, D.A. and Draper, S.W., 1986. User centered system design: new perspectives on humancomputer interaction. 1st ed. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
62. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., and Sharp, H., 2002. Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. 1st ed. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
63. Ravden, S. and Johnson, G., 1989. Evaluating usability of human-computer interfaces: a practical method. 1st ed. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
64. Shackel, B., 1986. Ergonomics in design for usability. In: M.D. Harrison and A.F. Monk, eds. 2nd conference of the British computer society human computer special interest group. Cambridge: University Press, 44-64, 23-26 September 1986 York.
65. Shackel, B., 1997. Human-computer interaction-whence and whither? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48 (11), 970-986.
66. Shneiderman, B., 1992. Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. 2nd ed. New York: Addison-Wesley.
67. Stanton, N.A., 1998. Product design with people in mind. In: N. Stanton, ed. Human factors in consumer products. 1st ed. London: Taylor and Francis, 1-17.
68. Stanton, N.A. and Baber, C., 1992. Usability and EC directive 90/270. Displays, 13 (3), 151-160.
69. Stanton, N.A. and Young, M.S., 1998. Ergonomics methods in consumer product design and evaluation. In: N.A. Stanton, ed. Human factors in consumer products. 1st ed. London: Taylor and Francis, 21-54.
70. Stanton, N.A. and Young, M.S., 2003. Giving ergonomics away? The application of ergonomics methods by novices. Applied Ergonomics, 34 (5), 479-490.
71. Stevens, A., et al., 2002. Design guidelines for safety of in-vehicle information systems. London: Transport Research Laboratory.
72. Sweeney, M., Maguire, M., and Shackel, B., 1993. Evaluating user-computer interaction: a framework. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38 (4), 689-711.
73. Young, K.L., Regan, M.A., and Lee, J.D., 2009. Factors moderating the impact of distraction on driving performance and safety. In: M.A. Regan, J.D. Lee and K.L. Young, eds. Driver distraction: theory, effects and mitigation. 1st ed. Florida: CRC Press, 335-351.