Subjective evaluation of usability

Ergonomics

Volumn 45, Issue 14, 2002, Pages 1021-1025

  Baber, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ERGONOMICS; EVALUATION; NOMENCLATURE; NOTE; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; RATING SCALE; STANDARDIZATION;

ENVIRONMENT DESIGN; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELF EFFICACY; WORKLOAD;

EID: 0037113314     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140130210166807     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. Dowell, J. and Long, J. 1989, Towards a conception for an engineering discipline of human factors, Ergonomics, 32, 1513-1535.
2. ISO, 1994, DIS 9241-11: Ergonomics Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs): Part 11: Framework for Describing Usability in Terms of User-based Measures (Geneva: International Standards Organization).
3. Kemp, J. A. M. and Van Gelderen, T. 1996, Co-discovery exploration: An informal method for iterative design of consummer products, in P. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester and I. L. McClelland (eds), Usability Evaluation in Industry (London: Taylor & Francis), 139-146.
4. Navon, D. 1984, Resources: A theoretical soupstone, Psychological Review, 91, 216-334.
5. Nielsen, J. 1993, Usability Engineering (London: Academic Press).
6. Shackel, B. 1981, The concept of usability, in Proceedings of the IBM Software and Information Usability Symposium (Poughkeepsie: IBM), 1-30.
7. Stanton, N. A. and Baber, C. 1992, Usability and EC 90/270, Displays, 13, 151-160.
8. Whiteside, J., Bennett, J. and Holtzblatt, K. 1988, Usability engineering: Our experience and evolution, in M. Helander (ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (Amsterdam: North-Holland), 791-817.