Overshadowing and associability change

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 287-299

  Jones, Peter M ^a   Haselgrove, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Associability; Attention; Cue competition; Overshadowing

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONDITIONED REFLEX; LEARNING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT; REINFORCEMENT;

ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; RATS; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY);

RATTUS;

EID: 79960585054     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0023140     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Beesley T., Le Pelley M.E. The influence of blocking on overt attention and associability in human learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2011, 37:114-120.
2. Blair C.A.J., Hall G. Changes in stimulus salience as a result of stimulus preexposure: Evidence from aversive and appetitive testing procedures. Learning & Behavior 2003, 31:185-191.
3. Blair C.A.J., Hall G. Perceptual learning in flavor aversion: Evidence for learned changes in stimulus effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2003, 29:39-48.
4. Chamizo V.D., Aznar-Casanova J.A., Artigas A.A. Human overshadowing in a virtual pool: Simple guidance is a good competitor against locale learning. Learning and Motivation 2003, 34:262-281.
5. Collins J., Hall N., Paul L.A. Causation and counterfactuals 2004, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Dopson J.C., Esber G.R., Pearce J.M. Differences in associability of relevant and irrelevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2010, 36:258-267.
7. Dopson J.C., Williams N.A., Esber G.R., Pearce J.M. Enhanced attention to stimuli that consistently signal the absence of reinforcement. Learning and Behavior 2010, 38:337-347.
8. Duffaud A., Killcross A.S., George D.N. Optional-shift behaviour in rats: A novel procedure for assessing attentional processes in discrimination learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60:534-542.
9. Dwyer D.M., Haselgrove M., Jones P.M. Cue interactions in flavor preference learning: A configural analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2011, 37:41-57.
10. Dwyer D.M., Honey R.C. The effects of habituation training on compound conditioning are not reversed by an associative activation treatment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2007, 33:185-190.
11. Hall G. Learned changes in the sensitivity of stimulus representations: Associative and nonassociative mechanisms. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2003, 56B:43-55.
12. Hall G., Rodriguez G. Factors determining the effects of associative activation on habituation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2009, 35:266-270.
13. Haselgrove M., Esber G.R., Pearce J.M., Jones P.M. Two kinds of attention in Pavlovian conditioning: Evidence for a hybrid model of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2010, 36:456-470.
14. Holland P.C. Overshadowing and blocking as acquisition deficits: No recovery after extinction of overshadowing or blocking cues. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1999, 52B:307-333.
15. James J.H., Wagner A.R. One-trial overshadowing: Evidence of distributive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1980, 6:188-205.
16. Kamin L.J. " Attention-like" processes in classical conditioning. Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior: Aversive stimulation 1968, 9-31. University of Miami Press, Miami, FL. M.R. Jones (Ed.).
17. Kruschke J.K., Kappenman E.S., Hetrick W.P. Eye gaze and individual differences consistent with learned attention in associative blocking and highlighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:830-845.
18. Le Pelley M.E. The role of associative history in models of associative learning: A selective review and a hybrid model. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2004, 57B:193-243.
19. Le Pelley M.E. The hybrid modelling approach to conditioning. Computational models of conditioning 2010, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. N.A. Schmajuk (Ed.).
20. Le Pelley M.E., Suret M.B., Beesley T. Learned predictiveness effects in humans: A function of learning, performance or both?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2009, 35:312-327.
21. Mackintosh N.J. An analysis of overshadowing and blocking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1971, 23:118-125.
22. Mackintosh N.J. A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review 1975, 82:276-298.
23. Mackintosh N.J. Overshadowing and stimulus intensity. Animal Learning and Behavior 1976, 4:186-192.
24. Mackintosh N.J., Reese B. One-trial overshadowing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1979, 31:519-526.
25. McLaren I.P.L., Mackintosh N.J. An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior 2000, 28:211-246.
26. Pavlov I.P. Conditioned reflexes 1927, Oxford University Press, London.
27. Pearce J.M. A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review 1987, 94:61-73.
28. Pearce J.M., Esber G.R., George D.N., Haselgrove M. The nature of discrimination learning in pigeons. Learning and Behavior 2008, 36:188-199.
29. Pearce J.M., Graham M., Good M.A., Jones P.M., McGregor A. Potentiation, overshadowing, and blocking of spatial learning based on-the shape of the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Behavior Processes 2006, 32:201-214.
30. Pearce J.M., Hall G. A model for Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review 1980, 87:532-552.
31. Pearce J.M., Mackintosh N.J. Two theories of attention: A review and a possible integration. Learning and attention 2010, Oxford University Press, Oxford. M.E. Le Pelley, C.J. Mitchell (Eds.).
32. Rescorla R.A. Unequal associative changes when excitors and neutral stimuli are conditioned in compound. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2001, 54B:53-68.
33. Rescorla R.A., Wagner A.R. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory 1972, 64-99. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York. A.H. Black, W.F. Prokasy (Eds.).
34. Revusky S. The role of interference in association over a delay. Animal memory 1971, 155-213. Academic Press, New York. W.K. Honig, P.H.R. James (Eds.).
35. Speers M.A., Gillan D.J., Rescorla R.A. Within-compound associations in a variety of compound conditioning procedures. Learning and Motivation 1980, 11:135-149.
36. Sutherland N.S., Mackintosh N.J. Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning 1971, Academic Press, New York.
37. Tennant W.A., Bitterman M.E. Blocking and overshadowing in 2 species of fish. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1975, 104:22-29.
38. Wagner A.R. Context-sensitive elemental theory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section 2003, 56B:7-29.
39. Wagner A.R. Expectancies and the priming of STM. Cognitive processes in animal behavior 1978, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. S.H. Hulse, H. Fowler, W.K. Honig (Eds.).
40. Wills A.J., Lavric A., Croft G.S., Hodgson T.L. Predictive learning, prediction errors, and attention: Evidence from event-related potentials and eye tracking. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2007, 19:843-854.