Changes in stimulus salience as a result of stimulus preexposure: Evidence from aversive and appetitive testing procedures

Learning and Behavior

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 185-191

  Blair, C A J ^a   Hall, Geoffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; APPETITE; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; FLAVOR; FOOD INTAKE; LEARNING; MALE; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION; RAT; STIMULUS; TASTE AVERSION; ANIMAL; ATTENTION; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); PERCEPTION DISORDER; RAT STRAIN; REINFORCEMENT; TASTE ACUITY; TIME;

ANIMALS; APPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ATTENTION; AVOIDANCE LEARNING; GENERALIZATION, STIMULUS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); RATS; RATS, INBRED STRAINS; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); TASTE THRESHOLD; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0042736225     PISSN: 15434494     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/bf03195981     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. BAKEMAN, R., & MCARTHUR, D. (1996). Picturing repeated measures: Comments on Loftus, Morrison, and others. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 584-589.
2. BLAIR, C. A. J., & HALL, G. (2003). Perceptual learning in flavor aversion: Evidence for learned changes in stimulus effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 39-48.
3. CRUZ, C. E., PERELLE, I. B., & WOLF, G. (1977). Methodological aspects of sodium appetite: An addendum. Behavioural Biology, 20, 96-103.
4. GIBSON, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
5. HALL, G. (1996). Learning about associatively activated stimulus representations: Implications for acquired equivalence and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 233-255.
6. HALL, G. (2001). Perceptual learning: Association and differentiation. In R. R. Mowrer & S. B. Klein (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary learning theories (pp. 367-407). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. HALL, G. (2003). Learned changes in the sensitivity of stimulus representations: Associative and nonassociative mechanisms. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 43-55.
8. MCLAREN, I. P. L., KAYE, H., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: Applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. In R. G. M. Morris (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology (pp. 102-130). Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
9. MCLAREN, I. P. L., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 211-246.
10. RESCORLA, R. A., & CUNNINGHAM, C. L. (1978). Within-compound flavor associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 267-275.
11. WAGNER, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.