The hybrid modeling approach to conditioning

Computational Models of Conditioning

Volumn 9780521113649, Issue , 2010, Pages 71-107

  Le Pelley, M E ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS;

ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING; HYBRID MODEL; LEARNING PROCESS; MODELS OF LEARNING; NEGATIVE TRANSFERS; PRIOR EXPERIENCE;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 79960570453     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511760402.004     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. Baker, A. G. & Mackintosh, N. J. (1977). Excitatory and inhibitory conditioning following uncorrelated presentations of CS and UCS. Animal Learning and Behavior, 5, 315-319.
2. Baker, A. G. & Mackintosh, N. J. (1979). Preexposure to the CS alone, or CS and US uncorrelated: latent inhibition, blocking by context or learned irrelevance?Learning and Motivation, 10, 278-294.
3. Baxter, M. G., Gallagher, M. & Holland, P. C. (1999). Blocking can occur without losses in attention in rats with selective removal of hippocampal cholinergic input. Behavioral Neuroscience, 113, 881-890.
4. Beesley, T. & Le Pelley, M. E. (2010). The effect of predictive history on the learning of sub-sequence contingencies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 108-135.
5. Bennett, C. H., Wills, S. J., Oakeshott, S. M. & Mackintosh, N. J. (2000). Is the context specificity of latent inhibition a sufficient explanation of learned irrelevance?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53B, 239-253.
6. Bonardi, C. & Hall, G. (1996). Learned irrelevance: no more than the sum of CS and US preexposure effects? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 183-191.
7. Bonardi, C. & Ong, S. Y. (2003). Learned irrelevance: a contemporary overview. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 80-89.
8. Bonardi, C., Graham, S., Hall, G. & Mitchell, C. J. (2005). Acquired distinctiveness and equivalence in human discrimination learning: evidence for an attentional process. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 88-92.
9. Brandon, S. E., Vogel, E. H. & Wagner, A. R. (2003). Stimulus representation in SOP i: theoretical rationalization and some implications. Behavioral Processes, 62, 5-25.
10. Bush, R. R. & Mosteller, F. (1951). A mathematical model for simple learning. Psychological Review, 58, 313-323.
11. Dias, R., Robbins, T. W. & Roberts, A. C. (1996). Dissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts. Nature, 380, 69-72.
12. Dickinson, A. (2001). Causal learning: an associative analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 54, 3-25.
13. Dickinson, A., Shanks, D. R. & Evenden, J. L. (1984). Judgement of act-outcome contingency: the role of selective attribution. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 29-50.
14. Dopson, J., Esber, G. R. & Pearce, J. M. (2010). Differences between the associability of relevant and irrelevant stimuli are not due to acquired equivalence and distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 36, 258-267.
15. Estes, W. K. (1950). Toward a statistical theory of learning. Psychological Review, 57, 94-107.
16. George, D. N. & Pearce, J. M. (1999). Acquired distinctiveness is controlled by stimulus relevance not correlation with reward. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 363-373.
17. Graham, S. & McLaren, I. P. L. (1998). Retardation in human discrimination learning as a consequence of preexposure: latent inhibition or negative priming?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51B, 155-172.
18. Hall, G. (1991). Perceptual and Associative Learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19. Hall, G. & Pearce, J. M. (1979). Latent inhibition of a CS during CS-US pairings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 31-42.
20. Hall, G. & Pearce, J. M. (1982). Restoring the associability of a preexposed CS by a surprising event. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34B, 127-140.
21. Harris, J. A. (2006). Elemental representations of stimuli in associative learning. Psychological Review, 113, 584-605.
22. Harris, J. A. (2010). The arguments of associations. In N. A. Schmajuk, ed., Computational Models of Conditioning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Haselgrove, M., Esber, G. R., Pearce, J. M. & Jones, P. M. (in press). Differences in stimulus associability following continuous and partial reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes.
24. Holland, P. C. & Fox, G. D. (2003). Effects of hippocampal lesions in overshadowing and blocking procedures. Behavioral Neuroscience, 117, 650-656.
25. Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell and R. M. Church, eds., Punishment and Aversive Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 279-296.
26. Kaye, H. & Pearce, J. M. (1984). The strength of the orienting response during Pavlovian conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 90-109.
27. Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative Activity of the Brain. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.
28. Kruschke, J. K. (1996). Dimensional relevance shifts in category learning. Connection Science, 8, 225-247.
29. Kruschke, J. K. (2001). Towards a unified model of attention in associative learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 45, 812-863.
30. Lawrence, D. H. (1952). The transfer of a discrimination along a continuum. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 45, 511-516.
31. Le Pelley, M. E. (2004). The role of associative history in models of associative learning: a selective review and a hybrid model. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 193-243.
32. Le Pelley, M. E. & McLaren, I. P. L. (2003). Learned associability and associative change in human causal learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 68-79.
33. Le Pelley, M. E. & Schmidt-Hansen, M. (2010). Latent inhibition and learned irrelevance in human contingency learning. In R. E. Lubow and I. Weiner, eds., Latent Inhibition: Cognition, Neuroscience, and Applications to Schizophrenia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 94-113.
34. Le Pelley, M. E., Turnbull, M. N., Reimers, S. J. & Knipe, R. L. (2010). Learned predictiveness effects following single-cue training in humans. Learning and Behavior, 38, 126-144.
35. Leung, H. T. & Westbrook, R. F. (2008). Spontaneous recovery of extinguished fear responses deepens their extinction: a role for error-correction mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 461-474.
36. Livesey, E. J. & McLaren, I. P. L. (2007). Elemental associability changes in human discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 148-159.
37. Lovejoy, E. (1968). Attention in Discrimination Learning. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.
38. Lubow, R. E. (1973). Latent inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 398-407.
39. Lubow, R. E. (1989). Latent Inhibition and Conditioned Attention Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Lubow, R. E. & Gewirtz, J. C. (1995). Latent inhibition in humans: data, theory, and implications for schizophrenia. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 87-103.
41. Mackintosh, N. J. (1969). Further analysis of the overtraining reversal effect. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 67.
42. Mackintosh, N. J. (1973). Stimulus selection: learning to ignore stimuli that predict no change in reinforcement. In R. A. Hinde and J. S. Hinde, eds., Constraints on Learning. London: Academic Press, pp. 75-96.
43. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
44. Mackintosh, N. J. (1978). Cognitive or associative theories of conditioning: implications of an analysis of blocking. In H. Fowler, W. K. Honig and S. H. Pulse, eds., Cognitive Processes in Animal Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 155-175.
45. Mackintosh, N. J. & Turner, C. (1971). Blocking as a function of novelty of CS and predictability of UCS. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 359-366.
46. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned Reflexes. London: Oxford University Press.
47. Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.
48. Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587-607.
49. Pearce, J. M. & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532-552.
50. Pearce, J. M., George, D. N. & Redhead, E. S. (1998). The role of attention in the solution of conditional discriminations. In N. A. Schmajuk and P. C. Holland, eds., Occasion Setting: Associative Learning and Cognition in Animals. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
51. Pearce, J. M. Kaye, H. & Hall, G. (1982). Predictive accuracy and stimulus associability: development of a model for Pavlovian conditioning. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein and A. R. Wagner, eds., Quantitative Analyses of Behavior: Acquisition (Vol. 3). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
52. Pearce, J. M., Nicholas, D. J. & Dickinson, A. (1982). Loss of associability by a conditioned inhibitor. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34B, 149-162.
53. Reid, L. S. (1953). The development of noncontinuity behavior through continuity learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 107-112.
54. Rescorla, R. A. (1969). Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 77-94.
55. Rescorla, R. A. (2000). Associative changes in excitors and inhibitors differ when they are conditioned in compound. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 428-438.
56. Rescorla, R. A. (2001). Unequal associative changes when excitors and neutral stimuli are conditioned in compound. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 53-68.
57. Rescorla, R. A. (2002). Effect of following an excitatory-inhibitory compound with an intermediate reinforcer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 163-174.
58. Rescorla, R. A. & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black and W. F. Prokasy, eds., Classical Conditioning n: Current Research and Theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 64-69.
59. Schmajuk, N. A. (2009). Attentional and error-correcting associative mechanisms in classical conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 407-418.
60. Schmajuk, N. A. & Moore, J. W. (1985). Real-time attentional models for classical conditioning and the hippocampus. Physiological Psychology, 13, 278-290.
61. Schmajuk, N. A., Lam, Y. W. & Gray, J. A. (1996). Latent inhibition: a neural network approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 321-349.
62. Shepp, B. E. & Eimas, P. D. (1964). Intradimensional and extradimensional shifts in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 57, 357-361.
63. Shepp, B. E. & Schrier, A. M. (1969). Consecutive intradimensional and extradimensional shifts in monkeys. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 67, 199-203.
64. Sutherland, N. S. & Mackintosh, N. J. (1971). Mechanisms of Animal Discrimination Learning. New York: Academic Press.
65. Swan, J. A. & Pearce, J. M. (1988). The orienting response as an index of stimulus associability in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 292-301.
66. Whitney, L. & White, K. G. (1993). Dimensional shift and the transfer of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46B, 225-252.
67. Wilson, P. N., Boumphrey, P. & Pearce, J. M. (1992). Restoration of the orienting response to a light by a change in its predictive accuracy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44B, 17-36.
68. Zeaman, D. & House, B. J. (1963). The role of attention in retardate discrimination learning. In N. R. Ellis, ed., Handbook of Mental Deficiency: Psychological Theory and Research. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 378-418.