Plants have a chance: Outdoor educational programmes alter students' knowledge and attitudes towards plants

Environmental Education Research

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 537-551

  Fančovičová, Jana ^a   Prokop, Pavol ^a,b  

^a TRNAVA UNIVERSITY   (Slovakia)

^b Institute of Zoology   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Knowledge; Non formal learning; Outdoor programme; Plants

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960582165     PISSN: 13504622     EISSN: 14695871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2010.545874     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Baumert, K., T. Herzog, and J. Pershing. 2006. Navigating the numbers: Greenhouse gas data and international climate policy. Washington, DC: World Resource Institute.
2. Bebbington, A. 2005. The ability of A-level student to name plants. Journal of Biological Education 32, no. 2: 62-7.
3. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. DiEnno, C., and S. Hilton. 2005. High school students' knowledge, attitudes, and levels of enjoyment of an environmental education unit on non-native plants. Journal of Environmental Education 37, no. 1: 13-25.
5. Dudley, N. 2005. Impact of forest loss and degradation on biodiversity. In Forest restoration in landscapes, ed. S. Mansourian and D. Vallauri, vol. XXVIII, 17-21. New York: Springer.
6. Eshach, H. 2007. Bringing in-school and out of school learning: Formal, non-formal and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology 16, no. 2: 171-190.
7. Fančovičová, J., and P. Prokop. 2010. Development and initial psychometric assessment of the Plant Attitude Questionnaire. Journal of Science Education and Technology 19, no. 5: 415-421.
8. Fančovičová, J., and P. Prokop. 2011. Children's ability to recognise toxic and non-toxic fruits: A preliminary study. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies 3, no. 3: 497-504.
9. Fernández-Manzanal, R., L.M.R. Barreiro, and M.C. Jimenez. 1999. Relationship between ecology fieldwork and student attitudes toward environmental protection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36, no. 4: 431-453.
10. Gatt, S., S. Tunnicliffe, K. Borg, and K. Lautier. 2007. Young Maltese children's ideas about plants. Journal of Biological Education 41, no. 3: 117-121.
11. Gorsuch, R. 1983. Factor analysis. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Grime, J. 1998. Essay review: Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems - Immediate filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology 86, no. 6: 902-910.
13. Gruenewald, D.A. 2003. Foundations of place: A multidisciplinary framework for placeconscious education. American Educational Research Journal 40, no. 3: 619-654.
14. Hamilton-Ekeke, J. 2007. Relative effectiveness of expository and field trip methods of teaching on students' achievement in ecology. International Journal of Science Education 29, no. 15: 1869-1889.
15. Harvey, M.R. 1989. Children's experiences with vegetation. Children's Environment Quarterly 6, no. 1: 36-43.
16. Heerwagen, J., and G. Orians. 1993. Humans, habitats, and aesthetics. In The biophilia hypothesis, ed. S.R. Kellert and E.O. Wilson, 138-172. Washington, DC: Island Press.
17. Heimlich, J.E., and N.M. Ardoin. 2008. Understanding behavior to understand behavior change: A literature review. Environmental Education Research 14, no. 3: 215-237.
18. Hong, J., K. Shim, and N. Chang. 1998. A study of Korean middle school students' interests in biology and their implications for biology education. International Journal of Science Education 20, no. 8: 989-999.
19. Isaac, S., and W.B. Michael. 1972. Handbook in research and evaluation. San Diego, CA: Robert Knapp.
20. Kaiser, F., S. Wolfing, and U. Fuhrer. 1999. Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19, no. 1: 1-19.
21. Kaplan, H. 1996. A theory of fertility and parental investment in traditional and modern human societies. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 39: 91-135.
22. Kareiva, P., and M. Marvier. 2003. Conserving biodiversity coldspots. American Scientist 91, no. 4: 344-351.
23. Kinchin, I. 1999. Investigating secondary-school girls' preferences for animals or plants: A simple 'head-to-head' comparison using two unfamiliar organisms. Journal of Biological Education 33, no. 2: 95-99.
24. Kinzig, A., S. Pacal, and D. Tilman. 2002. The functional consequences of biodiversity: Empirical progress and theoretical expectations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25. Kollmuss, A., and J. Agyeman. 2002. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research 8, no. 3: 239-260.
26. Kuhlemeier, H., H. Van Den Bergh, and N. Lagerweij. 1999. Environmental knowledge, attitudes and behavior in Dutch secondary education. Journal of Environmental Education 30, no. 2: 4-15.
27. Lindemann-Matthies, P. 2005. 'Loveable' mammals and 'lifeless' plants: How children's interest in common local organisms can be enhanced through observation of nature. International Journal of Science Education 27, no. 6: 655-677.
28. Lippa, R. 2002. Gender, nature, and nurture. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Lohr, V., and C. Pearson-Mims. 2005. Children's active and passive interactions with plants influence their attitudes and action toward trees and gardening as adults. Hort Technology 15, no. 3: 472-476
30. Lohr, V., C. Pearson-Mims, J. Tarnai, and D. Dillman. 2004. How urban residents rate and rank the benefits and problems associated with trees in cities. Journal of Arboriculture 30, no. 1: 28-35.
31. Martín-López, B., C. Montes, and J. Benayas. 2007. The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 139, nos. 1-2: 67-82.
32. Mascia, M., J. Brosius, T. Dobson, B. Forbes, L. Horowitz, M. McKean, and N. Turner. 2003. Conservation and the social sciences. Conservation Biology 17, no. 3: 649-650.
33. Naito, T., T. Matsuda, P. Intasuwan, W. Chuawanlee, S. Thanachanan, J. Ounthitiwat, and M. Fukushima. 2010. Gratitude for, and regret toward, nature: Relationships to proenvironmental intent of university students from Japan. Social Behavior and Personality 38, no. 7: 993-1008.
34. Nunnaly, J. 1978. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
35. Passey, R., M. Morris, and F. Reed. 2010. Impact of school gardening on learning: Final report submitted to the Royal Horticultural Society. London: RHS.
36. Price, E.A., J. Vining, and C.D. Saunders. 2009. Intrinsic and extrinsic rewards in a nonformal environmental education program. ZOO Biology 28, no. 5: 361-376.
37. Prokop, P., M. Prokop, and S. Tunnicliffe. 2007. Is biology boring? Student attitudes toward biology. Journal of Biological Education 42, no. 1: 36-39.
38. Prokop, P., G. Tuncer, and J. Chudá. 2007. Slovakian students' attitudes toward biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 3, no. 4: 287-295.
39. Prokop, P., G. Tuncer, and R. Kvasničák. 2007. Short-term effects of field programme on students' knowledge and attitude toward biology: A Slovak experience. Journal of Science Education and Technology 16, no. 3: 247-255.
40. Rice, G. 2006. Pro-environmental behavior in Egypt: Is there a role for Islamic environmental ethics? Journal of Business Ethics 65, no. 4: 373-390.
41. Rickinson, M., J. Dillon, K. Teamey, M. Morris, M. Choi, D. Sanders, and P. Benefield. 2004. A review of research on outdoor learning. Preston Montford: Field Studies Council.
42. Sanders, D. 2007. Making public the private life of plants: The contribution of informal learning environments. International Journal of Science Education 29, no. 10: 1209-1228.
43. Saunders, C.D., A.T. Brook, and O.E. Myers. 2006. Using psychology to save biodiversity and human well-being. Conservation Biology 20, no. 3: 702-705.
44. Schussler, E., and L. Olzak. 2008. It's not easy being green: Student recall of plant and animal images. Journal of Biological Education 42, no. 3: 112-118.
45. Shrigley, R. 1990. Attitude and behavior correlates. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 27, no. 2: 97-113.
46. Smith-Sebasto, N., and L. Cavern. 2006. Effects of pre- and posttrip activities associated with a residential environmental education experience on students' attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Education 37, no. 4: 3-17.
47. Stern, M.J., R.B. Powell, and N.M. Ardoin. 2008. What difference does it make? Assessing outcomes from participation in a residential environmental education program. Journal of Environmental Education 39, no. 4: 31-43.
48. Strgar, J. 2007. Increasing the interest of students in plants. Journal of Biological Education 42, no. 1: 19-23.
49. Tull, D. 1994. Elementary students' responses to questions about plant identification: Response strategies in children. Science Education 78, no. 4: 323-343.
50. Tuncer, G., H. Ertepinar, C. Tekkaya, and S. Sungur. 2005. Environmental attitudes of young people in Turkey: Effects of school type and gender. Environmental Education Research 11, no. 2: 215-233.
51. Tunnicliffe, S. 2001. Talking about plants: Comments of primary school groups looking at plant exhibits in a botanical garden. Journal of Biological Education 36, no. 1: 27-34.
52. Tunnicliffe, S., and M. Reiss. 2000. Building a model of the environment: How do children see plants? Journal of Biological Education 34, no. 4: 172-177.
53. Vaske, J., and K. Kobrin. 2001. Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Education 32, no. 4: 16-21.
54. Wandersee, J. 1986. Plants or animals - Which do junior high school students prefer to study? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 23, no. 5: 415-426.
55. Wandersee, J., and E. Schussler. 1999. Preventing plant blindness. The American Biology Teacher 61: 82-86.
56. Wandersee, J., and E. Schussler. 2001a. Plants that draw a crowd: An analysis of the visual characteristics of six unusual plants featured at botanic gardens. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Botanical Society of America, August, in Albuquerque, NM.
57. Wandersee, J., and E. Schussler. 2001b. Toward a theory of plant blindness. Plant Science Bulletin 47, no. 1: 2-9.
58. Wood-Robinson, C. 1991. Young people's ideas about plants. Studies in Science Education 19, no. 1: 119-135.
59. Zelezny, L. 1999. Educational interventions that improve environmental behaviors: A metaanalysis. Journal of Environmental Education 31, no. 1: 5-14.
60. Žoldošová, K., and P. Prokop. 2006. Education in the field influences children's ideas and interest toward Science. Journal of Science Education and Technology 15, no. 3: 304-313.