An MDE approach to software process tailoring

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 43-52

  Hurtado Alegría, Julio A ^a,b   Bastarrica, María Cecilia ^a   Quispe, Alcides ^a   Ochoa, Sergio F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DEL CAUCA   (Colombia)

Author keywords

model driven engineering; software process lines; tailoring

Indexed keywords

ERROR PRONES; MEDIUM SIZE; MODEL BASED APPROACH; MODEL-DRIVEN ENGINEERING; ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESS; PROCESS ENGINEER; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING PROCESS; SOFTWARE PROCESS LINES; SOFTWARE PROCESS TAILORING; TAILORING;

ENGINEERS; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 79960579049     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1987875.1987885     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, ER'08, pages 455-468. Springer-Verlag, 2008.
2. O. Armbrust, M. Katahira, Y. Miyamoto, J. Münch, H. Nakao, and A. Ocampo. Scoping software process models: initial concepts and experience from defining space standards. In ICSP'08: Proceedings International Conference on Software Process: Making globally distributed software development a success story, pages 160-172, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer-Verlag.
3. O. Armbrust, M. Katahira, Y. Miyamoto, J. Münch, H. Nakao, and A. Ocampo. Scoping software process lines. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 14(3):181-197, 2009.
4. X. Bai, L. Huang, and H. Zhang. On scoping stakeholders and artifacts in software process. In Münch et al. [23], pages 39-51.
5. N. Belkhatir and J. Estublier. Supporting reuse and configuration for large scale software process models. In Software Process Workshop, 1996. Process Support of Software Product Lines., Proceedings of the 10th International, pages 35-39, 1996.
6. B. W. Boehm, B. Clark, E. Horowitz, J. C. Westland, R. J. Madachy, and R. W. Selby. Cost Models for Future Software Life Cycle Processes: COCOMO 2.0. Annals of Software Engineering, 1:57-94, 1995.
7. E. Breton and J. Bézivin. Model driven process engineering. In Computer Software and Applications Conf., 2001. COMPSAC 2001, pages 225-230, 2001.
8. D. W. Bustard and F. Keenan. Strategies for systems analysis: Groundwork for process tailoring. In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems (ECBS'05), pages 357-362, Washington DC, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society.
9. M. A. Cusumano, A. MacCormack, C. F. Kemerer, and W. B. Crandall. Critical Decisions in Software Development: Updating the State of the Practice. IEEE Software, 26(5):84-87, 2009.
10. K. Czarnecki and S. Helsen. Feature-based Survey of Model Transformation Approaches. IBM Systems Journal, 45(3):621-645, 2006. (Pubitemid 44323030)
11. K. Czarnecki, S. Helsen, and U. W. Eisenecker. Formalizing cardinality-based feature models and their specialization. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 10(1):7-29, 2005.
12. th ACIS Int. Conf. on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, 2007., volume 2, pages 782-787, 2007.
13. J. Dörr, S. Adam, M. Eisenbarth, and M. Ehresmann. Implementing Requirements Engineering Processes: Using Cooperative Self-Assessment and Improvement. IEEE Software, 25(3):71-77, 2008. (Pubitemid 351715620)
14. D. Firesmith. Creating a Project-Specific Requirements Engineering Process. Journal of Object Technology, 3(5):31-44, 2004. (Pubitemid 38790340)
15. S. Henninger and K. Baumgarten. A Case-Based Approach to Tailoring Software Processes. In 4th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, ICCBR 2001, volume 2080 of LNCS, pages 249-262. Springer, 2001.
16. J. A. Hurtado and C. Bastarrica. Process Model Tailoring as a Mean for Process Knowledge Reuse. In 2nd Workshop on Knowledge Reuse, KREUSE, Falls Church, Virginia, USA., September 2009.
17. J. A. Hurtado, A. Lagos, A. Bergel, and M. C. Bastarrica. Software Process Model Blueprints. In Münch et al. [23], pages 273-284.
18. th Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conf. on OOPSLA'2006, pages 719-720. ACM, 2006.
19. P. Killisperger, M. Stumptner, G. Peters, G. Grossmann, and T. Stückl. Meta Model Based Architecture for Software Process Instantiation. In Trustworthy Software Development Processes, International Conference on Software Process, ICSP 2009, LNCS 5543, pages 63-74, 2009.
20. S. Koolmanojwong and B. W. Boehm. The Incremental Commitment Model Process Patterns for Rapid-Fielding Projects. In Münch et al. [23], pages 150-162.
21. P. A. Laplante and C. J. Neill. Opinion: The Demise of the Waterfall Model Is Imminent. ACM Queue, 1(10):10-15, 2004.
22. I. Mirbel and J. Ralyté. Situational method engineering: combining assembly-based and roadmap-driven approaches. Requirements Engineering, 11(1):58-78, 2006. (Pubitemid 43118935)
23. J. Münch, Y. Yang, and W. Schäfer, editors. New Modeling Concepts for Today's Software Processes, International Conference on Software Process, ICSP 2010, Paderborn, Germany, July 8-9, 2010. Proceedings, volume 6195 of LNCS. Springer, 2010.
24. A. Ocampo, F. Bella, and J. Münch. Software process commonality analysis. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 10(3):273-285, 2005. (Pubitemid 41360217)
25. OMG. Software Process Engineering Metamodel SPEM 2.0 OMG Beta Specification. Technical Report ptc/07-11-01, OMG, 2007.
26. L. J. Osterweil. Software Processes Are Software Too. In 9th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE'1987, pages 2-13, 1987.
27. S. Park, H. Na, and V. Sugumaran. A semi-automated filtering technique for software process tailoring using neural network. Expert Systems with Applications, 30:179-189, 2006. (Pubitemid 41745041)
28. O. Pedreira, M. Piattini, M. R. Luaces, and N. R. Brisaboa. A systematic review of software process tailoring. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 32(3):1-6, 2007.
29. J. Ralyté, R. Deneckére, and C. Roll. Towards a generic model for situational method engineering. In CAiSE 2003, LNCS 2681, pages 95-110. Springer-Verlag, 2003.
30. C. Rolland. Method engineering: State-of-the-art survey and research proposal. In Proceeding of the 2009 conference on New Trends in Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques, pages 3-21, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009. IOS Press.
31. D. C. Schmidt. Model-Driven Engineering. IEEE Computer, 39(2):25-31, 2006.
32. B. I. Simidchieva, L. A. Clarke, and L. J. Osterweil. Representing process variation with a process family. In Q. Wang, D. Pfahl, and D. M. Raffo, editors, International Conference on Software Process, ICSP'2007, volume 4470 of LNCS, pages 109-120. Springer, 2007.
33. S. M. Sutton and L. J. Osterweil. Product families and process families. In ISPW '96: Proceedings of the 10th International Software Process Workshop, page 109, Washington, DC, USA, 1996. IEEE Computer Society.
34. G. Valdés, H. Astudillo, M. Visconti, and C. López. The Tutelkán SPI Framework for Small Settings: A Methodology Transfer Vehicle. In Proceedings of the 17th EuroSPI, volume 99, pages 142-152, Grenoble, France, September 2010. Communications in Computer and Information Science.
35. H. Washizaki. Building software process line architectures from bottom up. In J. Münch and M. Vierimaa, editors, Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, LNCS, pages 415-421. Springer, 2006.
36. P. Xu. Knowledge support in software process tailoring. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS '05, 2005.