On scoping stakeholders and artifacts in software process

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6195 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 39-51

  Bai, Xu ^a   Huang, LiGuo ^a   Zhang, He ^b  

^a Southern Methodist University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MODELING SYSTEMS; SCOPING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING PROCESS; SOFTWARE PROCESS; SOFTWARE PROCESS MODELING; SOFTWARE PROCESS MODELING AND SIMULATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; WEB SURVEYS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENGINEERING; WORLD WIDE WEB;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 77955454062     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14347-2_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Osterweil, L.: Software processes are software too. In: ICSE 1987: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Software Engineering, pp. 2-13. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1987)
2. Kotonya, G., Sommerville, I.: Requirements engineering. Wiley, Chichester (1998)
3. Freeman, R.: Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Advances in strategic management 1, 31-60 (1983)
4. Thiel, S.: On the definition of a framework for an architecting process supporting product family development. Lecture notes in computer science, pp. 125-142. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
5. Madachy, R., Koolmanojwong, S., Osterweil, L., Huang, L., Phongpaibul, M.: Presentations on the workshop of modeling systems and software engineering processes (2008), http://csse.usc.edu/events/2008/ARR/pages/program.html#mon
6. Bai, X., Huang, L., Zhang, H., Koolmanojwong, S.: Hybrid Modeling and Simulation for Trustworthy Software Process Management: A Stakeholder-Oriented Approach. SPIP submission (2009)
7. Aranda, G., Vizcaino, A., Cechich, A., Piattini, M.: How to choose groupware tools considering stakeholders' preferences during requirements elicitation? In: Haake, J.M., Ochoa, S.F., Cechich, A. (eds.) CRIWG 2007. LNCS, vol. 4715, p. 319. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
8. Kiraka, R., Manning, K.: Managing organisations through a process-based perspective: its challenges and benefits. Business Change and Re-engineering 12, 288-298 (2005)
9. Curtis, B., Kellner, M.I., Over, J.: Process modeling. Commun. ACM 35, 75-90 (1992)
10. Fenton, N., Pfleeger, S.: Software metrics: a rigorous and practical approach. PWS Publishing Co., Boston (1997)
11. Li, M.: Triso-model: A new approach to integrated software process assessment and improvement: Research sections. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 12, 387-398 (2007)
12. Cohn, M.L., Sim, S.E., Lee, C.P.: What counts as software process? negotiating the boundary of software work through artifacts and conversation. Comput. Supported Coop. Work 18, 401-443 (2009)
13. Bai, X., Huang, L.: A stakeholder perspective in evaluating process modeling languages and hybrid process simulation (2008) Technocal Report
14. Biffl, S., Aurum, A., Boehm, B., Erdogmus, H., Grnbacher, P.: Value-Based Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
15. Kitchenham, B., Charters, S.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Version 2, 2007-01 (2007)
16. Bai, X., Huang, L., Zhang, H.: Software Process Stakeholders and Artifacts: A Systematic Review. Technical Report (2009)
17. Cotterell, M., Hughes, B.: Software project management (1995)