Scoping software process lines

Software Process Improvement and Practice

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 181-197

  Armbrust, Ove ^a   Katahira, Masafumi ^b   Miyamoto, Yuko ^b   Münch, Jürgen ^a   Nakao, Haruka ^c   Ocampo, Alexis ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER IESE   (Germany)

^b JAPAN AEROSPACE EXPLORATION AGENCY   (Japan)

^c Japan Manned Space Systems Corporation   (Japan)

Author keywords

Process analysis; Process selection; Scoping; software process line; Software product line

Indexed keywords

PROCESS ANALYSIS; PROCESS SELECTION; SCOPING; SOFTWARE PROCESS LINE; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; STANDARDIZATION;

PROCESS DESIGN;

EID: 67049159404     PISSN: 10774866     EISSN: 10991670     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/spip.412     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Armbrust O, Katahira M, Miyamoto Y, Münch J, Nakao H, Ocampo A. 2008. Scoping software process models - initial concepts and experience from defining space standards. Proceedings of the International Conference in Software Process (ICSP2008), Leipzig, Germany, pp 160-172.
2. Avison DE,Wood-Harper AT. 1991. Information systems development research: an exploration of ideas in practice. The Computer Journal 34(2): 98-112.
3. Basili VR, Rombach HD. 1991. Support for comprehensive reuse. IEEE Software Engineering Journal 6(5): 303-316.
4. Baudoin C, Hollowell G. 1996. Realizing the Object-Oriented Lifecycle. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
5. Bayer J, Flege O, Knauber P, Laqua R, Muthig D, Schmid K, Widen T, DeBaud J. 1999. PuLSE: A Methodology to Develop Software Product Lines. Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Reusability (SSR99), Los Angeles, California, United States, pp 122-131.
6. Bayer J, Kose M, Ocampo A. 2006. Improving the development of e-business systems by introducing process-based software product lines. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES'2006), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 348-361.
7. Becker U, Hamann D, Verlage M. 1997. Descriptive Modeling of Software Processes. ISERN Report 97-10, Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering (IESE), Kaiserslautern, Germany.
8. Belady LA. Leonardo: theMCC software research project. 1989. In: Ng, PA, Yeh, RT (eds): Modern Software Engineering, Foundations and Current Perspectives. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.: New York, NY.
9. Bella F, Münch J, Ocampo A. Observation-based development of software process baselines: an experience report. 2004. Proceedings of the Conference on Quality Engineering in Software Technology (CONQUEST), September 22-24 2004, Nuremberg, Germany.
10. Biffl S, Halling M. 2003. Managing software inspection knowledge for decision support of inspection planning. In: Aurum, A, Jeffery, R, Wohlin, C, Handzic, M (eds): Managing Software Engineering Knowledge. Springer Verlag: Berlin.
11. Bittner K, Spence I. 2002. Use Case Modeling. Addison- Wesley Longman: Amsterdam. BöckleG, ClementsP, McGregor JD, MuthigD, Schmid K. 2004. Calculating ROI for software product lines. IEEE Software 21(3): 23-31.
12. Capability Maturity Model Integration, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/, last visited 19 January 2009.
13. Clements P, Northrop L. 2002. Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley Boston,MA, USA.
14. Cohen L. 1995. Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You. Addison Wesley Longman Reading, MA, USA. Das V-Modell XT 1.2.1.1, http://www.vmodellxt.de/, last visited 15 January 2009.
15. David HA. 1988. The Method of Paired Comparisons. Lubrecht & Cramer, Limited London, UK.
16. Denger C, Elberzhager F. 2006. A comprehensive framework for customizing quality assurance techniques. IESE-Report No. 118.06/E, Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering (IESE), Kaiserslautern, Germany.
17. Fitzgerald B, Russo NL, O'Kane T. 2003. Software development method tailoring at Motorola. Communications of the ACM 46(4): 65-70.
18. Form feeds function: The role of storyboards in requirements elicitation, http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/dec05/krebs/index.html, last visited 12 December 2008.
19. Formal Methods Europe, http://www.fmeurope.org/, last visited 12 December 2008.
20. Ganesa D, Muthig D, Yoshimura K. 2006. Predicting return-on-investment for product line generations. Proceedings of the 10th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC'06), 21-24 August 2006, Baltimore, Maryland, pp 13-24.
21. International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 61508. IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
22. International Organization for Standardization. 1995. ISO/IEC 12207 : 1995. ISO/IEC: Geneva, Switzerland.
23. International Organization for Standardization. 2006. ISO/IEC 15504. ISO/IEC: Geneva, Switzerland.
24. John I, Knodel J, Lehner T, Muthig D. 2006. A practical guide to product line scoping. Proceedings of the 10th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC 2006), 21-24 August 2006, Baltimore, Maryland.
25. Linstone HA, Turoff M. 1975. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Addison-Wesley Reading, MA, USA.
26. Mills HD, Dyer M, Linger RC. 1987. Cleanroom software engineering. IEEE Software 4(5): 19-25.
27. Osborn AF. 1957. Applied Imagination. Charles Scribner's Sons: New York.
28. Osterweil LJ. 1987. Software processes are software too. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 1987), Monterey, California, 1987, pp 2-13.
29. Parnas DL. 1976. On the design and development of program families. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE-2(1): 1-9.
30. Rombach HD. 2005. Integrated software process and product lines. Proceedings of the International Software Process Workshop (SPW 2005), Beijing, China, pp 83-90.
31. Schmid K. 2002. A comprehensive product line scoping approach and its validation. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2002), May 19-25, 2002, Orlando, Florida, pp 593-603.
32. Schmid K. 2003. Planning software reuse - a disciplined scoping approach for software product lines. PhD Thesis, Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Kaiserslautern.
33. Schweikhard T. 2006. Identification of inspectionvariation-factors for a decision-support-tool. Diplomarbeit, Fachbereich Informatik, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern.
34. Simidchieva BI, Clarke LA,Osterweil LJ. 2007. Representing process variation with a process family. Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Process (ICSP 2007), May 19-20, 2007, Minneapolis, Minnesota, pp 109-120.
35. SPEARMINT, http://www.iese.fhg.de/fhg/iese/research/quality/pam/index.jsp last visited 7 April 2009.
36. Vegas S, Basili VR. 2005. A characterization schema for software testing techniques. Empirical Software Engineering 10(4): 437-466.
37. Yourdon E, Constantine LL. 1979. Structured Design: Fundamentals of a Discipline of Computer Program and Systems Design. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.