A new data envelopment analysis method for priority determination and group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 195, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 239-250

  Wang, Ying Ming ^a,b   Chin, Kwai Sang ^b  

^a FUZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Data envelopment analysis; DEAHP; Group decision making; Multiple criteria decision making

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC SURFACE WAVE DEVICES; ACOUSTIC SURFACE WAVE FILTERS; AGGLOMERATION; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHIES; DEA MODELS; DEAHP; DECISION MAKERS; GROUP AHP; GROUP DECISION MAKING; GROUP DECISION MAKINGS; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES; MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; NUMERICAL EXAMPLES; PAIR-WISE COMPARISONS; PAIRWISE COMPARISON MATRIXES; POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS; PRIORITY VECTORS; SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING; SUBJECTIVE JUDGMENTS;

DECISION THEORY;

EID: 55949083151     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.049     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Belton V., and Gear T. On a shortcoming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchies. Omega 11 3 (1983) 228-230
2. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., and Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 (1978) 429-444
3. Chu A.T.W., Kalaba R.E., and Spingarn K. A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 27 4 (1979) 531-538
4. Cogger K.O., and Yu P.L. Eigenweight vectors and least-distance approximation for revealed preference in pairwise weight ratios. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 46 (1985) 483-491
5. Crawford G.B. The geometric mean procedure for estimating the scale of a judgment matrix. Mathematical Modelling 9 (1987) 327-334
6. Hwang C.L., and Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications (1981), Springer-Verlag, Berlin
7. Islei G., and Lockett A.G. Judgemental modelling based on geometric least square. European Journal of Operational Research 36 (1988) 27-35
8. Mikhailov L. A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of the Operational Research Society 51 (2000) 341-349
9. Ramanathan R. Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process. Computers and Operations Research 33 (2006) 1289-1307
10. Saaty T.L. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (2000), RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
11. Saaty T.L., and Vargas L.G. The legitimacy of rank reversal. Omega 12 5 (1984) 513-516
12. Sevkli M., Koh S.C.L., Zaim S., Demirbag M., and Tatoglu E. An application of data envelopment analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection: a case study of BEKO in Turkey. International Journal of Production Research 45 9 (2007) 1973-2003
13. Wang Y.M., Parkan C., and Luo Y. A linear programming method for generating the most favorable weights from a pairwise comparison matrix. Computers and Operations Research (2007) 10.1016/j.cor.2007.05.002