Building Credibility for Non-Profit Organizations through Webpage Interface Design

Journal of Visual Literacy

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 140-162

  Jean Kensicki, Linda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960534298     PISSN: 1051144X     EISSN: 23796529     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/23796529.2003.11674598     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Austin, E. W. & Dong, Q. (1994). Source v. content effects on judgments of news believability. Journalism Quarterly, 71. 973–983.
2. Barker-Plummer. B. (1995). News as a Political resource: Media Strategies and Political Identity in the U.S. Women's Movement, 1966–1975. Critical Studies in Mass Communication. 12. 306.
3. Berlo, D. K., Lernen, J. B. & Mertz, R. J. (1970). Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33, 563–576.
4. Birdsell, D., Muzzio, D., Taylor. H. & Krane. D. (1996). A new political marketplace: The web snares voters. The Public Perspective. June/July, 33.
5. Brady, D. J. (1996). Cyberdemocracy and perceptions of politics: An experimental analysis of political communication on the World Wide Web. Paper presented at the annua! meeting of the Midwest Association for Public Opinion Research. Chicago, IL:
6. Buller, D. B. & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory. 6, (3), 203–242.
7. Carter. R. & Greenberg, B. (1965). Newspapers or television: Which do you believe? Journalism Quarterly, 42. 29–34.
8. Chaiken, S. (1979). Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 37. 1387–1397.
9. Chartprasert, D. (1993). How bureaucratic writing style affects source credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 150–159.
10. Dollarhide, M. (1999). Survey: Journalists find nonprofit Web sites more credible. Freedom Forum Online, (March), http://www.freedomforum.org/technology/1999/3/2msc.asp.Retrieved March 2002.
11. Dyson, E. (1997). Release 2.0: A design for living in the digital age. New York, NY: Broadway Books.
12. Fetveit, A. (1999). Reality TV in the digital era: A paradox in visual culture? Media, Culture & Society, 21, 787–804.
13. Flanagin, A. J. & Metzger, M J. (2000). Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 515–540.
14. Fogg, B. J., Kameda, T., Boyd, J., Marshall, J. Sethi, R., Sockol, M. & Trowbridge, T. (2002). Stanford-Makovsky web credibility study 2002: Investigating what makes web sties credible today. A Research Report by the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab & Makovsky & Company. Stanford University. [Online: http://www.webcredibility.org]
15. Fogg, B. J., Marshall, J., Laraki, O., Osipovich, A., Varma. C, Fang, N. Paul. J. Rangnekar, A., Shon, J., Swani. P. & Treinen, M. (2001). What makes a web site credible? A report on a large quantitative study. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1,61–68. New York, NY: ACM Press. [Online http://captology.stanford.edu/pdf/p61-fogg.pdf]
16. Fogg, B. J. & Tseng, H. (1999). The elements of computer credibility. Proceedings of the CH199 Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems, 80–87. New York, NY: ACM Press.
17. Foss, K. (1992). Digital dilemma: Enhancement or manipulation? Photo Electronic Imaging, April, 21–23.
18. rd edition. Englewood Cliffs, CA: Prentice-Hall.
19. Gatignon, H & Robertson, T. S. (1991). Innovative decision processes. In T. S. Robertson & h. H. Kassarjian (Eds.), Handbook of Consumer Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice-Hall.
20. Gattegno. C. (1969). Towards a visual culture: Educating through television. New York, NY: Outerbridge & Dienstfrey.
21. Gitlin, T. (1980). The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
22. Goldman, R. & Beeker, G. (1985). Decoding newsphotos: An analysis of embedded ideological values. Humanity and Society, 9, 351–361.
23. Gorham, Joan, Cohen, Stanley H., and Morris, Tracy L. (1999). Fashion in the classroom III: Effects of instructor attire and immediacy in natural classroom interactions. Communication Quarterly, 47, 281–299.
24. Gotlieb, J. B. & Sarel, D. (1991). Comparative advertising effectiveness: The role of involvement and source credibility. Journal of Advertising, 20, (1), 38–45.
25. Hall, S. (1973). The determinations of news photographs, in S. Cohen & J. Young (Eds.), The manufacture of news: Deviance, social problems and the mass media, pp. 176–190. London, United Kingdom: Constable.
26. Homer. P. M. & Kahle, L. R. (1990). Source expertise, time of source identification, and involvement in persuasion: An elaborative processing perspective. Journal of Advertising, 19, (1), 30–39.
27. Hovland. C. I. & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 633.650.
28. Huang. E. (2001). Readers' perception of digital alteration in photojournalism. Journalism & Communication Monographs, i, (3), 147–182.
29. Hunderlmark. J. (1991). When enhancement is deception: The ethics of photo manipulation. Publish, October, 51–55.
30. Huxford. J. (2001). Beyond the referential: Uses of visual symbolism in the press. Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism, 2. 45–71.
31. Johnson, T. J. & Kaye, B. K. (1998). Cruising is believing?: Comparing internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75. 325–340.
32. Kaplowitz, S., Fink, E., Mulcrone, J., Atkin, D. & Dabil, S. (1991). Disentangling the effects of discrepant and disconfirming information. Social Psychology Quarterly. 54, 191–207.
33. Kim, J. & Moon, J. Y. (1997). Designing towards emotional usability in customer interfaces: Trustworthiness of cyber-banking system interfaces. Interacting with Computers. 10. 1–29.
34. Kiousis, S. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication & Society, 4, 381–403.
35. Lashbrook, W. B., Snavely, W. B., & Sullivan, S. L. (1977). The effects of source credibility and message information quantity on the attitude change of apathetics. Communication Monographs, 44, 252–262.
36. Lauer, D. & Pentak, S. (2002). Design Basics, 5"' Edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
37. rd edition. Belmont. CA: Wadsorth/Thomson Learning.
38. Luchok, J. A. & McCroskey, J. C. (1978). The effect of quality of evidence on attitude change and source credibility. Southern Speech Communication Journal. 43. 371–383.
39. Messaris, P. (1994). Visual "literacy": Image, mind and reality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
40. McCroskey, J. & Mehrley, R. S. (1969). The effects of disorganization and nonfluency on attitude change and source credibility. Speech Monographs, 36, 13–21.
41. Mokhoff, N. (1999). Computers must be credible by design. Electronic Engineering Times, June 7, 61.
42. Molotch, H. (1979). Media and Movements. In M. Zald & J.M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Dynamics of Social Movements. 54–72.Cambridge, MA: Wintrop.
43. Mulac. A. & Sherman. A. R. (1975). Relationships among four parameters of speaker evaluation: Speech skill, source credibility, subjective speech anxiety, and behavioral speech anxiety. Speech Monographs, 42, 302–310.
44. O’Keefe. D. J. (1990). Persuasion theory and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45. Poynter Organization (2002). Color, Contrast & Dimension in News Design. http://www.poynter.org/special/colorproject/colorproject/color.html. Retrieved March of 2002.
46. Petty, R. & Cacioppo. J. (1981). Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque. IA: Brown.
47. Rimmer. T. & Weaver. D. (1987). Different questions, different answers? Media use and media credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 64, 28–36, 44.
48. Schweiger. Wolfgang. (2000). Media credibility - experience or image?: A survey on the credibility of the World Wide Web in Germany in comparison to other media. European Journal of Communication. 15, 37–59.
49. Self, C. S. (1996). Credibility. In M. Salwen & D. Stacks (Eds.). An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Slater, M. D. & Rouner,D. (1996). How message evaluation and source attributes may influence credibility assessment and belief change. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,. 73 (4, Winter), 974–991.
51. Sheldon, K. & Kasser, T. (2001). Getting older, getting better? Personal strivings and psychological maturity across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 37. (4), 491.
52. SPSS Base 9.0 Applications Guide (1999). Chicago, IL: SPSS.
53. Stempel III. G. & Hargrove, T. (1996). Mass media audiences in a changing media environment. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73. 549–558.
54. Sturken. M. & Cartwright. L. (2001). Practices of looking: An introduction to visual culture. Oxford. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
55. Srull. T. Liechtenstein, M. & Rothbart, M. (1985). Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, II, 316–345.
56. Stiff. J. (1994). Persuasive Communication. New York, NY: Guilford.
57. Wanta, W. & Hu, Yu-Wei (1994). The effects of credibility, reliance, and exposure on media agenda-setting: A path analysis model. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 90–98.
58. Ward, D. C. & McGinnies, E. (1974). Persuasive effects of early and late mention of credible and noncredible sources. Journal of Psychology, 86, (1), 17–23.
59. Westley, B. & Severin, W. (1964). Some correlates of media and credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 41, 325–335.
60. Whitehead, J. L. (1968). Factors of source credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 54, 59–63.
61. Williams, R. (1994). The non-designer's design book. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.
62. Woodall, W., Burgoon, J. & Markel, N. (1980). The effects of facial-head cue combinations on interpersonal evaluations. Communication Quarterly, 28, 47–55.
63. Yoon, K., Kim, C. H. & Kim, M. (1998). A cross-cultural comparison of the effects of source credibility on attitudes and behavioral intentions. Mass Communication & Society, 1, 153–173.
64. van Zoonen, E. A. (1992). The Women's Movement and the Media: Constructing a Public Identity. European Journal of Communication. 7, 453–476.