Readers' Perception of Digital Alteration in Photojournalism

Journalism and Communication Monographs

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 147-182

  Huang, Edgar Shaohua ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846860112     PISSN: 15226379     EISSN: 21614342     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/152263790100300302     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anonymous. (1999 June). AP history at http://www.ap.org/anniversary/nhistory/past1970_79.html.
2. Armstrong P. B., (1990). Conflicting readings: Variety and validity in interpretation. Chapel Hill; University of North Carolina Press.
3. Becker H., (1978, February). Do photographs tell the truth? Afterimage, pp. 9–13.
4. Brugioni D. A., (1999). Photo fakery: The history and techniques of photographic deception and manipulation. Dulles, Virginia: Brassey's.
5. Cala M., (1977, September). Photographs Don't Lie (But Photographers Sometimes Do!). Camera, 35, pp. 50–51 +.
6. Curtis James, (1989) Mind's eye, mind's truth—FSA photography reconsidered. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
7. Davis N., (1992, February). Electronic photo manipulation. Presstime, 22–23.
8. Fish S., (1980). Literature in the reader: Affective stylistics. In Fish S., (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
9. Fiske J., Hartley J., (1978). Reading television. London: Methuen.
10. Gladney G. A., Ehrlich M. C., (1996, Fall). Cross-media response to digital manipulation of still and moving images. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, (4), 428–439.
11. Goldberg V., (1991). The power of photography—How photographs changed our lives. New York: Abbeville Publishing Group.
12. Holub R. C., (1992). Crossing borders: Reception theory, poststructuralism, deconstruction. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press.
13. Kelly J. D., (1996). Going digital at college newspapers: The impact of photo credibility and work routines. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (79th, Anaheim, CA, August 10–13, 1996).
14. Martin E., (1991). On photographic manipulation. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, (3), 156–163.
15. McCracken G. D., (1988). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
16. Pavlik J. V., (1998, Spring). Journalism ethics and new media. Media Ethics, 9 (2), 1 +.
17. Radway J. A., (1991). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
18. nd, Washington, DC, August 10–13, 1989).
19. Reaves S., (1993, Fall-Winter). What's wrong with this picture? Daily newspaper photo editors' attitudes and their tolerance toward digital manipulation. Newspaper Research Journal, 13 (4), 131.
20. Reaves S., (1995). The vulnerable image - Categories of photos as predictor of digital manipulation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72 (3), 706–715.
21. Russial J., Wanta W., (1998, Autumn). Digital imaging skills and the hiring and training of photojournalists. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75 (3), 593–605.
22. Shedden D., (Compiled) (1999, June). New media time line. At http://www.poynter.org/research/nm/timeline/nt73.htm.
23. Singletary M. W., (1994). Mass communication research: Contemporary methods and applications. New York: Longman.
24. Steffens B., (1992, May). Ethics is a matter of head and heart, not of technology. Quill, 2.
25. nd, Washington, DC, August 10–13, 1989).