The spatial feature underlying the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude after-effects

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 834-844

  Gheorghiu, Elena ^a   Kingdom, Frederick A A ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Contour shape; Curvature; Shape amplitude after effect; Shape frequency after effect; Tilt after effect

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; DENSITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; NERVE CELL; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PERIODICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHAPE AMPLITUDE AFTER EFFECT; SHAPE FREQUENCY AFTER EFFECT; SPATIAL ORIENTATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; FEMALE; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 33847333835     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.023     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Anderson N.D., Habak C., Wilkinson F., and Wilson H.R. Evaluating curvature aftereffects with radial frequency contours. Journal of Vision 5 7 (2005) 209 Abstract
2. Anderson N.D., and Wilson H.R. The nature of synthetic face adaptation. Vision Research 45 (2005) 1815-1828
3. Blakemore C., and Over R. Curvature detectors in human vision?. Perception 3 1 (1974) 3-7
4. Coltheart M. Visual feature-analyzers and after-effects of tilt and curvature. Psychological Review 78 2 (1971) 112-121
5. DeValois R.L., and DeValois K.K. Spatial Vision (1988), Oxford University Press
6. Dobbins A., Zucker S.W., and Cynader M.S. Endstopping in the visual cortex as a substrate for calculating curvature. Nature, London 329 (1987) 438-441
7. Dobbins A., Zucker S.W., and Cynader M.S. Endstopping and curvature. Vision Research 29 10 (1989) 1371-1387
8. Dragoi V., Rivadulla C., and Sur M. Foci of orientation plasticity in visual cortex. Nature 411 6833 (2001) 80-86
9. Dragoi V., Sharma J., and Sur M. Adaptation-induced plasticity of orientation tuning in adult visual cortex. Neuron 28 1 (2000) 287-298
10. Durgin F.H. Visual aftereffects of texture density contingent on color of frame. Perception & Psychophysics 58 2 (1996) 207-223
11. Durgin F.H. Texture contrast after-effects are monocular; texture density aftereffects are binocular. Vision Research 41 20 (2001) 2619-2630
12. Durgin F.H., and Huk A.C. Texture density aftereffects in the perception of artificial and natural textures. Vision Research 37 23 (1997) 3273-3282
13. Durgin F.H., and Proffitt D.R. Visual learning in the perception of texture: simple and contingent aftereffects of texture density. Spatial Vision 9 4 (1996) 423-474
14. Gallant J.L., Braun J., and Van Essen D.C. Selectivity for polar, hyperbolic and Cartesian gratings in macaque visual cortex. Science 259 5091 (1993) 100-103
15. Gallant J.L., Connor C.E., Rakshit S., Lewis J.W., and Van Essen D.C. Neural responses to polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in area V4 of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 76 4 (1996) 2718-2739
16. Ganz L. Mechanisms of figural after-effects. Psychological Review 73 (1966) 128-150
17. Georgeson, M. A. (1979). Spatial Fourier analysis and human vision. In N. S. Sutherland (Ed.), Tutorial essays in psychology (Vol. 2, Chap. 2, pp. 39-88). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
18. Gheorghiu E., and Kingdom F.A.A. Luminance-contrast properties of contour-shape processing revealed through the shape-frequency after-effect. Vision Research 46 21 (2006) 3603-3615
19. Gheorghiu E., and Kingdom F.A.A. Luminance-contrast properties of contour-shape processing revealed through adaptation. Journal of Vision 6 6 (2006) 338
20. Gibson J.J. Adaptation. aftereffect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology 20 (1933) 453-467
21. Gibson J.J., and Radner M. Adaptation, aftereffect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology 20 (1937) 453-467
22. Gross C.G. Representation of visual stimuli in inferior temporal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 29: 335 1273 (1992) 3-10 Review
23. Habak C., Wilkinson F., Zahker B., and Wilson H.R. Curvature population coding for complex shapes in human vision. Vision Research 44 (2004) 2815-2823
24. Hess R.F., Wang Y.Z., and Dakin S.C. Are judgments of circularity local or global?. Vision Research 39 26 (1999) 4354-4360
25. Hubel D.H., and Wiesel T.N. RFs and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology 195 (1968) 215-243
26. Ito M., Fujita I., Tamura H., and Tanaka K. Processing of contrast polarity of visual images in inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. Cerebral cortex 4 5 (1994) 499-508
27. Keeble D.R.T., and Hess R.F. Discriminating local continuity in curved figures. Vision Research 39 (1999) 3287-3299
28. Kingdom F.A.A., and Gheorghiu E. On the mechanisms for contour-shape after-effects. Journal of Vision 6 6 (2006) 339
29. Kingdom F.A.A., and Prins N. Different mechanisms encode the shapes of contours and contour-textures. Journal of Vision 5 8 (2005) 463
30. Kingdom F.A.A., and Prins N. Separate after-effects for the shapes of contours and textures made from contours. Perception 34 Suppl. (2005) 92 Abstract
31. Koehler W., and Wallach H. Figural after-effects: an investigation of visual responses. Proceedings of the American Philosophycal Society 88 (1944) 306-335
32. Koenderink J.J., and Richards W. Two-dimensional curvature operators. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 5 (1988) 1136-1141
33. Kramer D., and Fahle M. A simple mechanism for detecting low curvatures. Vision Research 36 10 (1996) 1411-1419
34. Levi D.M., and Klein S.A. Seeing circles: what limits shape perception?. Vision Research 40 17 (2000) 2329-2339
35. Loffler G., Wilson H.R., and Wilkinson F. Local and global contributions to shape discrimination. Vision Research 43 (2003) 519-530
36. Magnussen S., and Johnsen T. Temporal aspects of spatial adaptation. A study of the tilt after-effect. Vision Research 26 4 (1986) 661-672
37. Magnussen S., and Kurtenbach W. A test for contrast-polarity selectivity in the tilt aftereffect. Perception 8 5 (1979) 523-528
38. Magnussen S., and Kurtenbach W. Adapting to two orientations: disinhibition in a visual aftereffect. Science 207 4433 (1980) 908-909
39. Magnussen S., and Kurtenbach W. Linear summation of tilt illusion and tilt aftereffect. Vision Research 20 1 (1980) 39-42
40. Meese T.S., and Georgeson M.A. The tilt aftereffect in plaids and gratings: channel codes, local signs and 'patchwise' transforms. Vision Research 36 10 (1996) 1421-1437
41. Mitchell D.E., and Muir D.W. Does the tilt after-effect occur in the oblique meridian?. Vision Research 16 6 (1976) 609-613
42. Paradiso M.A., Shimojo S., and Nakayama K. Subjective contours, tilt aftereffect, and visual cortical organization. Vision Research 29 9 (1989) 1205-1213
43. Pasupathy A., and Connor C.E. Responses to contour features in macaque area V4. Journal of Neurophysiology 82 5 (1999) 2490-2502
44. Pasupathy A., and Connor C.E. Shape representation in area V4: position-specific tuning for boundary conformation. Journal of Neurophysiology 86 5 (2001) 2505-2519
45. Pasupathy A., and Connor C.E. Population coding of shape in area V4. Nature Neuroscience 5 12 (2002) 1332-1338
46. Poirier F.J., and Wilson H.R. A biological plausible model of human radial frequency perception. Vision Research 46 15 (2006) 2443-2455
47. Regan D., and Hamstra S.J. Shape discrimination and the judgment of perfect symmetry: dissociation of shape from size. Vision Research 32 10 (1992) 1845-1864
48. Riggs L.A. Curvature as a feature of pattern vision. Science 181 104 (1973) 1070-1072
49. Rosness R., Magnussen S., and Nordby K. Spatial vision of the achromat: the tilt after-effect. Vision Research 34 15 (1994) 2021-2022
50. Stromeyer III C.F., and Riggs L.A. Curvature detectors in human vision?. Science 14:184 142 (1974) 1199-1201
51. Suzuki S. Attention-dependent brief adaptation to contour orientation: a high-level aftereffect for convexity?. Vision Research 41 (2001) 3883-3902
52. Suzuki S. Attentional selection of overlapped shapes: a study using brief shape aftereffects. Vision Research 43 (2003) 549-561
53. Suzuki S., and Cavanagh P. A shape-contrast effect for briely presented stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 5 (1998) 1315-1341
54. Tanaka K. Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience 19 (1996) 109-139
55. Tyler C.W. Periodic vernier acuity. Journal of Physiology 228 3 (1973) 637-647
56. Watt R.J., and Andrews D.P. Contour curvature analysis: hyperacuities in the discrimination of detailed shape. Vision Research 22 4 (1982) 449-460
57. Wenderoth P., and Johnstone S. The different mechanisms of the direct and indirect tilt illusions. Vision Research 28 2 (1988) 301-312
58. Wilkinson F., Wilson H.R., and Habak C. Detection and recognition of radial-frequency patterns. Vision Research 38 (1998) 3555-3568
59. Wilson H.R. Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain hyperacuities. Vision Research 26 3 (1986) 453-469
60. Wilson, H. R. (1991). Pattern discrimination, visual filters and spatial sampling irregularity. In J. A. Movshon, M. S. Landy (Eds.): Computational models of visual processing.
61. Wilson H.R., and Richards W.A. Mechanisms of contour curvature discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 6 (1989) 106-115
62. Wilson H.R., and Richards W.A. Curvature and separation discrimination at texture boundaries. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 9 10 (1992) 1653-1662
63. Zetzsche C., and Barth E. Fundamental limits of linear filters in the visual processing of two-dimensional signals. Vision Research 30 7 (1990) 1111-1117