Identification of cavities on protein surface using multiple computational approaches for drug binding site prediction

Bioinformatics

Volumn 27, Issue 15, 2011, Pages 2083-2088

  Zhang, Zengming ^a   Li, Yu ^a   Lin, Biaoyang ^a   Schroeder, Michael ^b   Huang, Bingding ^a,b  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DRUG DESIGN; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DRUG DESIGN; INTERNET; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOFTWARE;

EID: 79960395595     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr331     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Binkowski,T.A. et al. (2003) CASTp: Computed Atlas of Surface Topography of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 3352-3355.
2. Brady,G.P. Jr and Stouten,P.F. (2000) Fast prediction and visualization of protein binding pockets with PASS. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 14, 383-401.
3. Capra,J.A. et al. (2009) Predicting protein ligand binding sites by combining evolutionary sequence conservation and 3D structure. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000585.
4. Cheng,A.C. et al. (2007) Structure-based maximal affinity model predicts smallmolecule druggability. Nat. Biotechnol., 25, 71-75.
5. Dundas,J. et al. (2006) CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins with structural and topographical mapping of functionally annotated residues. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, W116-W118.
6. Edelsbrunner,H. and Mucke,E. (1994) Three-dimensional alpha shapes. ACM Trans. Graph., 13, 43-72.
7. Ghersi,D. and Sanchez,R. (2009) EasyMIFS and SiteHound: a toolkit for the identification of ligand-binding sites in protein structures. Bioinformatics, 25, 3185-3186.
8. Hajduk,P.J. et al. (2005a) Druggability indices for protein targets derived from NMRbased screening data. J. Med. Chem., 48, 2518-2525.
9. Hajduk,P.J. et al. (2005b) Predicting protein druggability. Drug Discov. Today, 10, 1675-1682.
10. Hendlich,M. et al. (1997) LIGSITE: automatic and efficient detection of potential small molecule-binding sites in proteins. J. Mol. Graph. Model., 15, 359-363.
11. Hernandez,M. et al. (2009) SITEHOUND-web: a server for ligand binding site identification in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, W413-W416.
12. Huang,B. (2009) MetaPocket: a meta approach to improve protein ligand binding site prediction. OMICS, 13, 325-330.
13. Huang,B. and Schroeder,M. (2006) LIGSITEcsc: predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation. BMC Struct. Biol., 6, 19.
14. Huang,Y. et al. (2010) CD-HIT Suite: a web server for clustering and comparing biological sequences. Bioinformatics, 26, 680-682.
15. Kawabata,T. (2010) Detection of multiscale pockets on protein surfaces using mathematical morphology. Proteins, 78, 1195-1211.
16. Kawabata,T. and Go,N. (2007) Detection of pockets on protein surfaces using small and large probe spheres to find putative ligand binding sites. Proteins, 68, 516-529.
17. Laskowski,R.A. (1995) SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions. J. Mol. Graph., 13, 323-330, 307-308.
18. Laurie,A.T. and Jackson,R.M. (2005) Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites. Bioinformatics, 21, 1908-1916.
19. Le Guilloux,V. et al. (2009) Fpocket: an open source platform for ligand pocket detection. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 168.
20. Li,W. and Godzik,A. (2006) Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics, 22, 1658-1659.
21. Nayal,M. and Honig,B. (2006) On the nature of cavities on protein surfaces: application to the identification of drug-binding sites. Proteins, 63, 892-906.
22. Schmidtke,P. and Barril,X. (2010) Understanding and predicting druggability. A highthroughput method for detection of drug binding sites. J. Med. Chem., 53, 5858-5867.
23. Sugaya,N. and Ikeda,K. (2009) Assessing the druggability of protein-protein interactions by a supervised machine-learning method. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 263.
24. Weisel,M. et al. (2007) PocketPicker: analysis of ligand binding-sites with shape descriptors. Chem. Cent. J., 1, 7.
25. Wishart,D.S. et al. (2006) DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, D668-D672.
26. Wishart,D.S. et al. (2008) DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, D901-D906.
27. Yu,J. et al. (2010) Roll: a new algorithm for the detection of protein pockets and cavities with a rolling probe sphere. Bioinformatics, 26, 46-52.